The john insall award

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-44

  Mahoney, Ormonde M ^a,b   Kinsey, Tracy L ^a,c   D'Errico, Theresa J ^d   Shen, Jianhua ^d  

^a Athens Orthopedic Clinic PA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

^d STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; ARTHROSCOPY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEBRIDEMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FIXED BEARING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE BEARING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPEN REDUCTION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS INSTABILITY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SHORT FORM 12; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVOR; SYNOVECTOMY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WOUND IRRIGATION; YOUNG ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84865083068     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2114-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:145-153.
2. Argenson JN, O'Connor JJ. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:228-232.
3. Bach CM, Steingruber IE, Peer S, Nogler M, Wimmer C, Ogon M. Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:144-150.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
5. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2290-2296.
6. Blackwelder WC. 'Proving the null hypothesis' in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982;3:345-353.
7. Bottlang M, Erne OK, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB, Kessler O. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:105-111.
8. Bryant D, Havey TC, Roberts R, Guyatt G. How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:41-45.
9. Buechel FF Sr. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:40-50.
10. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, D'Alessio J. Twentyyear evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:41-50.
11. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, Dalessio J. Twentyyear evaluation of the New Jersey LCS Rotating Platform Knee Replacement. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:84-89.
12. Carr AJ, Morris RW, Murray DW, Pynsent PB. Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:178-182.
13. Chowdhury EAH, Porter ML. A study of the effect of tibial tray rotation on a specific mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:793-797.
14. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1306-1314.
15. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Ginn SD, Engh GA. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: Influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2702-2708.
16. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J. A kinematic comparison of fixed-and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1016-1021.
17. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2635-2641.
18. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12.
19. Garling EH, Valstar ER, Nelissen RGHH. Comparison of micromotion in mobile bearing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: A randomized RSA study of 40 knees followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:353-361.
20. Gioe TJ, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos ERG, Singh J. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2104-2112.
21. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, Zikria BA, Zikria JF, Ranawat CS. The PFC Sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: A matched-pair study. Orthopedics. 2006;29:S49-S52.
22. Henricson A, Dalén T, Nilsson KG. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:114-121.
23. Ho F-Y, Ma H-M, Liau J-J, Yeh C-R, Huang C-H. Mobilebearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:143-149.
24. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R1), June 10, 1996. Available at: Http://www. ich.org/products/guidelines/ efficacy/article/efficacy-guidelines.html. Accessed June 20, 2011.
25. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248: 13-14.
26. Kim YH, Kim DY, Kim JS. Simultaneous mobile-and fixedbearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:904-910.
27. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:101-115.
28. Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D. Fixedbearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years. Knee. 2008;15:206-210.
29. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax Outcomes G. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1856-1864.
30. Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL. 5-to 9-year survivorship of singleradius, posterior-stabilized TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:436-442.
31. Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analysing Survival Data From Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1995.
32. McEwen HM, Fisher J, Goldsmith AA, Auger DD, Hardaker C, Stone MH. Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:1049-1052.
33. McEwen HMJ, Barnett PI, Bell CJ, Farrar R, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech. 2005;38:357-365.
34. Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posteriorcruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:398-403.
35. Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN, Kinemax Outcomes G. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: How important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:286-294.
36. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: A prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:221-227.
37. Park MS, Kim SJ, Chung CY, Choi IH, Lee SH, Lee KM. Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1732-1737.
38. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT Statement. JAMA. 2006;295:1152-1160.
39. Post ZD, Matar WY, van de Leur T, Grossman EL, Austin MS. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Better than a fixed-bearing? J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:998-1003.
40. Pradhan NR, Gambhir A, Porter ML. Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: A study of eight different implant designs. Knee. 2006;13: 7-11.
41. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, de Steiger R, Dodd CAF, Gibbons M, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85: 62-67.
42. Ries MD, Weaver K, Rose RM, Gunther J, Sauer W, Beals N. Fatigue strength of polyethylene after sterilization by gamma irradiation or ethylene oxide. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333: 87-95.
43. Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;4:1.
44. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: 'to whom do the results of this trial apply?' Lancet. 2005;365:82-93.
45. Ryd L, Egund N. Subsidence of tibial components in knee arthroplasty. A comparison between conventional radiography and roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Invest Radiol. 1995;30:396-400.
46. Silva M, Kabbash CA, Tiberi JV 3rd, Park SH, Reilly DT, Mahoney OM, Schmalzried TP. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:135-144.
47. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D, Dougados M. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: The minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:29-33.
48. Vyskocil P, Gerber C, Bamert P. Radiolucent lines and component stability in knee arthroplasty. Standard versus fluoroscopicallyassisted radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:24-26.
49. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.
50. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Biorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B, Maruish ME. User's Manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2007.
51. Ware JE Jr, Kolinski M, Keller SD. How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summaries: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Centre; 1995.
52. Woolson ST, Northrop GD. Mobile-vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:135-140.
53. Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E. Patientreported outcomes after fixed-versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90:1172-1179.