Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: A prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 428, Issue , 2004, Pages 221-227

  Pagnano, Mark W ^a,b   Trousdale, Robert T ^a   Stuart, Michael J ^a   Hanssen, Arlen D ^a   Jacofsky, David J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Department of Orthopedic Surgery ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; CLIMBING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE INSTABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATELLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 8644232535     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148892.31464.81     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, et al: Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 366:155-163, 1999.
2. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT: The effects of axial rotation alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty as demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop 287:170-177, 1993.
3. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, et al: Femoral rotation alignment based on the anteroposterior axis in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1331-1334, 1995.
4. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, et al: Determining the rotation alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop 286:40-47, 1993.
5. Bindelglass DF, Cohen JL, Dorr LD: Patellar tilt and subluxation in total knee arthroplasty: Relationship to pain, fixation and design. Clin Orthop 286:103-109, 1993.
6. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al: Mobile-bearing knee replacement: Concepts and results. J Bone Joint Surg 82A:1020-1139, 2000.
7. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC: Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 82A:705-711, 2000.
8. Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR: The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1713-1720, 1995.
9. Gomes LS, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB: Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: A roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop 236:72-81, 1988.
10. Jordan LR, Siegel JL, Olivo JL: Early flexion routine. An alternative method of continuous passive motion. Clin Orthop 315:231-233, 1995.
11. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1989.
12. Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, et al: Surgery of the Knee. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1993.
13. Laskin RS: Lateral release rates after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:88-93, 2001.
14. Nelisse RG, Weidenheim L, Mikhail WE: The influence of the position of the patellar component on tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 19:224-228, 1995.
15. Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD: Varus tibial joint line obliquity: A potential cause of femoral component malrotation. Clin Orthop 392:68-74, 2001.
16. Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, et al: Patellofemoral tracking in posterior stabilized mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty [abstract]. Eastern Orthopaedic Association Poster P6. Available at http://www.jbjs.org/abstracts/ eoa01_posters.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2004.
17. Sorrells RB: The rotating platform mobile bearing TKA. Orthopedics 19:793-796, 1996.
18. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Anouchi YS: The effect of patellar button placement and femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 275:211-219, 1992.