Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Better than a fixed-bearing?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 998-1003

  Post, Zachary D ^a   Matar, Wadih Y ^a   van de Leur, Tim ^a   Grossman, Eric L ^a   Austin, Matthew S ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixed bearing; Functional score; Mobile bearing; Survivorship; TKA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIXATION DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; ROTATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77955922951     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.014     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Meding J.B., et al. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 388:51.
2. Dixon M.C., Brown R.R., Parsch D., et al. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:598.
3. Ranawat C.S., Flynn W.F., Saddler S., et al. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 286:94.
4. Rasquinha V.J., Ranawat C.S., Cervieri C.L., et al. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system with a posterior cruciate-substituting design. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:1006.
5. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., et al. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:89.
6. Pavone V., Boettner F., Fickert S., et al. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 388:18.
7. Berzins A., Jacobs J.J., Berger R., et al. Surface damage in machined ram-extruded and net-shape molded retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:1534.
8. Ho F.Y., Ma H.M., Liau J.J., et al. Mobile-bearing knees reduce rotational asymmetric wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 462:143.
9. Collier M.B., Engh C.A., McAuley J.P., et al. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1306.
10. Szivek J.A., Anderson P.L., Benjamin J.B. Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:952.
11. Bartel D.L., Bicknell V.L., Wright T.M. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68:1041.
12. Casey D., Cottrell J., DiCarlo E., et al. PFC knee replacement: osteolytic failures from extreme polyethylene degradation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:157.
13. Ranawat C.S., Komistek R.D., Rodriguez J.A., et al. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 418:184.
14. D'Lima D.D., Trice M., Urquhart A.G., et al. Comparison between the kinematics of fixed and rotating bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 380:151.
15. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D. Kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2005, 54:207.
16. Ranawat C.S., Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 226:6.
17. Callaghan J.J., O'Rourke M.R., Iossi M.F., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1995.
18. Huang C.H., Ma H.M., Lee Y.M., et al. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:265.
19. Buechel F.F., Buechel F.F., Pappas M.J., et al. Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS Rotating Platform Knee Replacement. J Knee Surg 2002, 15:84.
20. Callaghan J.J., Insall J.N., Greenwald A.S., et al. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 2001, 50:431.
21. Henricson A., Dalen T., Nilsson K.G. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 448:114.
22. Hansson U., Toksvig-Larsen S., Jorn L.P., et al. Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee 2005, 12:414.
23. Delport H.P., Banks S.A., De S.J., et al. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:1016.
24. Feng E.L., Stulberg S.D., Wixson R.L. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:60.
25. Fisher J., McEwen H.M., Tipper J.L., et al. Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:114.
26. Fisher J., McEwen H., Tipper J., et al. Wear-simulation analysis of rotating-platform mobile-bearing knees. Orthopedics 2006, 29(9 Suppl):S36.
27. Haider H., Garvin K. Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2677.
28. Huang C.H., Ma H.M., Liau J.J., et al. Osteolysis in failed total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:2224.
29. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Buzzi R., et al. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:145.
30. Woolson S.T., Northrop G.D. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:135.
31. Ranawat A.S., Rossi R., Loreti I., et al. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:35.
32. Bhan S., Malhotra R., Kiran E.K., et al. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2290.
33. Kim Y.H., Yoon S.H., Kim J.S. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1317.
34. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., et al. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:37.
35. Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Stuart M.J., et al. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:221.