Validation of an assessment rubric via controlled modification of a classroom activity

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1104-1108

  Bauer, Christopher F ^a   Cole, Renée ^b  

^a University of New Hampshire   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865076239     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ed2003324     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, R. D. Study of Curriculum Reform; U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement: Washington, DC, 1996.
2. Anderson, T. R.; Rogan, J. M. Bridging the Educational Research-Teaching Practice Gap: Curriculum Development, Part 1: Components of the Curriculum and Influence on the Process of Curriculum Design Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2011, 39, 68-76
3. Hargreaves, A., Ed. Extending Educational Change: International Handbook of Educational Change; Springer: New York, 2005.
4. Ferrini-Mundy, J.; Floden, R. E. Educational Policy Research and Mathematics Education. In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Lester, F. K., Jr., Ed.; Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, 2007.
5. Clements, D. H. Linking Research and Curriculum Development. In Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education; English, L. D., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2002.
6. Jones, M. G.; Carter, G. Science Teacher Attitudes and Beliefs. In Handbook of Research on Science Education; Abell, S. K.; Lederman, N. G., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2007.
7. Dancy, M.; Henderson, C. Pedagogical Practices and Instructional Change of Physics Faculty Am. J. Phys. 2010, 78, 1056-1063
8. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Home Page. http://www.pogil.org/ (accessed Jun 2012).
9. Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL); Moog, R.; Spencer, J., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 994; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2008.
10. ANA-POGIL Project. http://pogil.org/post-secondary/ana-pogil (accessed Jun 2012).
11. Henderson, C.; Finkelstein, N.; Beach, A. Beyond Dissemination in College Science Teaching: An Introduction to Four Core Change Strategies J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 2010, 39 (5) 18-25
12. Stevens, D. D.; Levi, A. J. Introduction to Rubrics; Stylus Publishing: Sterling, VA, 2005.
13. Allen, M. J. Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education. Anker/Jossey-Bass Publishing: San Francisco, CA, 2004.
14. Moskal, B. M. Scoring Rubrics Part I: What and When. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, ED446110: College Park, MD, 2000; http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED446110.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
15. Moskal, B. M. Scoring Rubrics Part II: How? ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, ED446111: College Park, MD, 2000; http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED446111.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
16. Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. Designing a Written Assignment To Promote the Use of Critical Thinking Skills in an Introductory Chemistry Course J. Chem. Educ. 2003, 80, 899-903
17. Diefes-Dux, H. A.; Zawojewski, J. S.; Hjalmarson, M. A. Using Educational Research in the Design of Evaluation Tools for Open-Ended Problems Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2010, 26, 807-819
18. Adamchik, C. F., Jr. The Design and Assessment of Chemistry Portfolios J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 528-531
19. Hafner, O. C.; Hafner, P. Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer-Group Rating Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2003, 25, 1509-1528
20. Moni, R. W.; Beswick, E.; Moni, K. B. Using Student Feedback To Construct an Assessment Rubric for a Concept Map in Physiology Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2005, 29, 197-203
21. Stoddart, T.; Abrams, R.; Gasper, E.; Canaday, D. Concept Maps as Assessment in Science Inquiry Learning-A Report of Methodology Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2000, 22, 1221-1246
22. Moskal, B. M. Developing Classroom Performance Assessments and Scoring Rubrics-Part I.; ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, ED481714: College Park, MD, 2003; http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED481714.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
23. Moskal, B. M. Developing Classroom Performance Assessments and Scoring Rubrics-Part II.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, ED481715: College Park, MD, 2003; http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED481715.pdf (accessed Jun 2012).
24. Reddy, Y. M.; Andrade, H. A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2010, 35, 435-448
25. Fay, M. E.; Grove, N. P.; Towns, M. H.; Bretz, S. L. A Rubric To Characterize Inquiry in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2007, 8, 212-219
26. Buck, L. B.; Bretz, S. L.; Towns, M. H. Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate Laboratory J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 2008, 38, 52-58
27. Docktor, J.; Heller, K. Assessment of Student Problem Solving Processes Phys. Educ. Res. Conf. 2009, 133-136
28. Nicholson, P.; Gillis, S.; Dunning, A. M. T. The Use of Scoring Rubrics To Determine Clinical Performance in the Operating Suite Nurse Educ. Today 2009, 29 (1) 73-82
29. Kersting, N. B.; Givvin, K. B.; Sotelo, F. L.; Stigler, J. W. Teachers Analyses of Classroom Video Predict Student Learning of Mathematics: Further Explorations of a Novel Measure of Teacher Knowledge J. Teacher Educ. 2010, 61, 172-181
30. Moog, R. S.; Farrell, J. J. Chemistry: A Guided Inquiry, 3 rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2006.