Erratum: Accurate prediction of noncovalent interaction energies with the effective fragment potential method: Comparison of energy components to symmetry-adapted perturbation theory for the S22 test set (Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2014) 10:10 (4759-4760) DOI:10.1021/ct200673a);Accurate prediction of noncovalent interaction energies with the effective fragment potential method: Comparison of energy components to symmetry-adapted perturbation theory for the S22 test set

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2835-2843

  Flick, Joanna C ^a   Kosenkov, Dmytro ^a   Hohenstein, Edward G ^b   Sherrill, C David ^b   Slipchenko, Lyudmila V ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865074490     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct500658b     Document Type: Erratum

References (73)

1. Hunter, C. A.; Singh, J.; Thornton, J. M. Pi-pi interactions: the geometry and energetics of phenylalanine-phenylalanine interactions in proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 837-846
2. Privalov, P. L.; Makhatadze, G. I. Contribution of hydration and non-covalent interactions to the heat capacity effect on protein unfolding J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 224, 715-723
3. Hunter, C. A. Meldola lecture. The role of aromatic interactions in molecular recognition Chem. Soc. Rev. 1994, 23, 101-109
4. Anbarasu, A.; Anand, S.; Babu, M. M.; Sethumadhavan, R. Investigations on C-H...pi interactions in RNA binding proteins Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 41, 251-259
5. Gazit, E. Self-assembled peptide nanostructures: the design of molecular building blocks and their technological utilization Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1263-1269
6. Černý, J.i.; Kabeláč, M.; Hobza, P. Double-helical → ladder structural transition in the B-DNA is induced by a loss of dispersion energy J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16055-16059
7. Thanthiriwatte, K. S.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Burns, L. A.; Sherrill, C. D. Assessment of the performance of DFT and DFT-D methods for describing distance dependence of hydrogen-bonded interactions J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 7, 88-96
8. Fedorov, D. G.; Kitaura, K. Extending the power of quantum chemistry to large systems with the fragment molecular orbital method J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 6904-6914
9. Fedorov, D. G.; Kitaura, K. The Fragment Molecular Orbital Method: Practical Applications to Large Molecular Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
10. Deev, V.; Collins, M. A. Approximate ab initio energies by systematic molecular fragmentation J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154102-154112
11. Yang, W. Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 1438
12. Zhang, D. W.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, J. Z. H. New advance in computational chemistry: Full quantum mechanical ab initio computation of streptavidin-biotin interaction energy J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12039-12041
13. Tschumper, G. S. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B.; Cundari, T. A., Eds.; Jon Wiley & Sons: NJ, 2009; p 39.
14. Xie, W.; Gao, J. Design of a next generation force field: The X-POL potential J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 1890-1900
15. Gao, J. A molecular-orbital derived polarization potential for liquid water J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 2346-2354
16. Gao, J. Toward a molecular orbital derived empirical potential for liquid simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 657-663
17. Gordon, M. S.; Fedorov, D. G.; Pruitt, S. R.; Slipchenko, L. V. Fragmentation methods: A route to accurate calculations on large systems Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 632-672
18. Gordon, M. S.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Li, H.; Jensen, J. H. The effective fragment potential: A general method for predicting intermolecular forces Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 2007, 3, 177-193
19. Ghosh, D.; Kosenkov, D.; Vanovschi, V.; Williams, C. F.; Herbert, J. M.; Gordon, M. S.; Schmidt, M. W.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Krylov, A. I. Noncovalent interactions in extended systems described by the effective fragment potential method: Theory and application to nucleobase oligomers J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 12739-12754
20. Slipchenko, L. V.; Gordon, M. S. Electrostatic energy in the effective fragment potential method: Theory and application to benzene dimer J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 276-291
21. Smith, T.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Gordon, M. S. Modeling π-π interactions with the effective fragment potential method: The benzene dimer and substituents J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 5286-5294
22. Smith, Q. A.; Gordon, M. S.; Slipchenko, L. V. Benzene-pyridine interactions predicted by the effective fragment potential method J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 4598-4609
23. Adamovic, I.; Li, H.; Lamm, M. H.; Gordon, M. S. Modeling styrene-styrene interactions J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 519-525
24. Smith, Q. A.; Gordon, M. S.; Slipchenko, L. V. Effective fragment potential study of the interaction of DNA bases J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 11269-11276
25. Slipchenko, L. V.; Gordon, M. S. Water-benzene interactions: An effective fragment potential and correlated quantum chemistry study J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 2092-2102
26. Adamovic, I.; Gordon, M. S. Methanol-water mixtures: A microsolvation study using the effective fragment potential method J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 10267-10273
27. Mullin, J. M.; Gordon, M. S. Alanine: Then there was water J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 8657-8669
28. Mullin, J. M.; Gordon, M. S. Water and alanine: From puddles(32) to ponds(49) J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 14413-14420
29. Jurečka, P.; Šponer, J.; Černý, J.; Hobza, P. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 1985-1993
30. Raghavachari, K.; Trucks, G. W.; Pople, J. A.; Head-Gordon, M. A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 479-483
31. Takatani, T.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Malagoli, M.; Marshall, M. S.; Sherrill, C. D. Basis set consistent revision of the S22 test set of noncovalent interaction energies J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 144104
32. Podeszwa, R.; Patkowski, K.; Szalewicz, K. Improved interaction energy benchmarks for dimers of biological relevance Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 5974-5979
33. Řezáč, J.; Riley, K. E.; Hobza, P. S66: A well-balanced database of benchmark interaction energies relevant to biomolecular structures J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2427-2438
34. Jeziorski, B.; Moszynski, R.; Szalewicz, K. Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waals complexes Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1887-1930
35. Hohenstein, E. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Density fitting of intramonomer correlation effects in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 014101
36. Adamovic, I.; Freitag, M. A.; Gordon, M. S. Density functional theory based effective fragment potential method J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 6725-6732
37. Gordon, M. S.; Freitag, M. A.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Jensen, J. H.; Kairys, V.; Stevens, W. J. The effective fragment potential method: A QM-based MM approach to modeling environmental effects in chemistry J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 293-307
38. Day, P. N.; Jensen, J. H.; Gordon, M. S.; Webb, S. P.; Stevens, W. J.; Krauss, M.; Garmer, D.; Basch, H.; Cohen, D. An effective fragment method for modeling solvent effects in quantum mechanical calculations J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 1968-1986
39. Gordon, M. S.; Mullin, J. M.; Pruitt, S. R.; Roskop, L. B.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Boatz, J. A. Accurate methods for large molecular systems J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 9646-9663
40. Stone, A. J. Distributed multipole analysis, or how to describe a molecular charge-distribution Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 83, 233-239
41. Stone, A. J. The Theory of Intermolecular Forces; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996.
42. Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 12. Further extensions of Gaussian-type basis sets for use in molecular-orbital studies of organic-molecules J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257
43. Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Influence of polarization functions on molecular-orbital hydrogenation energies Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213-222
44. Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Spitznagel, G. W.; Schleyer, P. V. Efficient diffuse function-augmented basis-sets for anion calculations. 3. The 3-21+G basis set for 1st-row elements, Li-F J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 294-301
45. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 20. Basis set for correlated wave-functions J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650-654
46. Frisch, M. J.; Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian-basis sets J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3265-3269
47. Slipchenko, L. V.; Gordon, M. S. Damping functions in the effective fragment potential method Mol. Phys. 2009, 107, 999-1016
48. Hohenstein, E. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Wavefunction methods for noncovalent interactions WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 304-326
49. Turney, J. M.; Simmonett, A. C.; Parrish, R. M.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Evangelista, F.; Fermann, J. T.; Mintz, B. J.; Burns, L. A.; Wilke, J. J.; Abrams, M. L.; Russ, N. J.; Leininger, M. L.; Janssen, C. L.; Seidl, E. T.; Allen, W. D.; Schaefer, H. F.; King, R. A.; Valeev, E. F.; Sherrill, C. D.; Crawford, T. D. PSI4: An open-source ab initio electronic structure program WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 556-565
50. Gráfová, L.; Pitoňák, M.; Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Comparative study of selected wave function and density functional methods for noncovalent interaction energy calculations using the extended S22 data set J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 2365-2376
51. Mòller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron Systems Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618-622
52. Dunning, T. H. Gaussian-basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. 1. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007-1023
53. Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H. Gaussian-basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. 5. Core-valence basis-sets for boron through neon J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 4572-4585
54. Schmidt, M. W.; Baldridge, K. K.; Boatz, J. A.; Elbert, S. T.; Gordon, M. S.; Jensen, J. H.; Koseki, S.; Matsunaga, N.; Nguyen, K. A.; Su, S. J.; Windus, T. L.; Dupuis, M.; Montgomery, J. A. General atomic and molecular electronic-structure system J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347-1363
55. Gordon, M. S.; Schmidt, M. W. Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry; Dykstra, C. E.; Frenking, G.; Kim, K. S.; Scuseria, G. E., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 2005; Chapter 41.
56. Kong, J.; White, C. A.; Krylov, A. I.; Sherrill, D.; Adamson, R. D.; Furlani, T. R.; Lee, M. S.; Lee, A. M.; Gwaltney, S. R.; Adams, T. R.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Gilbert, A. T. B.; Kedziora, G. S.; Rassolov, V. A.; Maurice, D. R.; Nair, N.; Shao, Y. H.; Besley, N. A.; Maslen, P. E.; Dombroski, J. P.; Daschel, H.; Zhang, W. M.; Korambath, P. P.; Baker, J.; Byrd, E. F. C.; Van Voorhis, T.; Oumi, M.; Hirata, S.; Hsu, C. P.; Ishikawa, N.; Florian, J.; Warshel, A.; Johnson, B. G.; Gill, P. M. W.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. Q-chem 2.0: A high-performance ab initio electronic structure program package J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 1532-1548
57. Shao, Y.; Molnar, L. F.; Jung, Y.; Kussmann, J.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Brown, S. T.; Gilbert, A. T. B.; Slipchenko, L. V.; Levchenko, S. V.; O'Neill, D. P.; DiStasio, R. A.; Lochan, R. C.; Wang, T.; Beran, G. J. O.; Besley, N. A.; Herbert, J. M.; Lin, C. Y.; Van Voorhis, T.; Chien, S. H.; Sodt, A.; Steele, R. P.; Rassolov, V. A.; Maslen, P. E.; Korambath, P. P.; Adamson, R. D.; Austin, B.; Baker, J.; Byrd, E. F. C.; Dachsel, H.; Doerksen, R. J.; Dreuw, A.; Dunietz, B. D.; Dutoi, A. D.; Furlani, T. R.; Gwaltney, S. R.; Heyden, A.; Hirata, S.; Hsu, C. P.; Kedziora, G.; Khalliulin, R. Z.; Klunzinger, P.; Lee, A. M.; Lee, M. S.; Liang, W.; Lotan, I.; Nair, N.; Peters, B.; Proynov, E. I.; Pieniazek, P. A.; Rhee, Y. M.; Ritchie, J.; Rosta, E.; Sherrill, C. D.; Simmonett, A. C.; Subotnik, J. E.; Woodcock, H. L.; Zhang, W.; Bell, A. T.; Chakraborty, A. K.; Chipman, D. M.; Keil, F. J.; Warshel, A.; Hehre, W. J.; Schaefer, H. F.; Kong, J.; Krylov, A. I.; Gill, P. M. W.; Head-Gordon, M. Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3172-3191
58. DiStasio, R. A., Jr.; von Helden, G.; Steele, R. P.; Head-Gordon, M. On the T-shaped structures of the benzene dimer Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 437, 277-283
59. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104
60. Chai, J.-D.; Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615-6620
61. Burns, L. A.; Vazquez-Mayagoitia, A.; Sumpter, B. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: A comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 084107
62. Goerigk, L.; Kruse, H.; Grimme, S. Benchmarking density functional methods against the S66 and S66 8 datasets for non-covalent interactions ChemPhysChem 2011, 12, 3421-3433
63. Yang, Yu, H.; York, D.; Cui, Q.; Elstner, M. Extension of the self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method: Third-order expansion of the density functional theory total energy and introduction of a modified effective Coulomb interaction J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 10861-10873
64. Korth, M. Third-generation hydrogen-bonding corrections for Ssemiempirical QM methods and force fields J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 3808-3816
65. Řezáč, J.; Hobza, P. Advanced corrections of hydrogen bonding and dispersion for semiempirical quantum mechanical methods J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 8, 141-151
66. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06 functionals and twelve other functionals Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215-241
67. Sherrill, C. D.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Chill, S. T. Assessment of the performance of the M05-2X and M06-2X exchange-correlation functionals for noncovalent interactions in biomolecules J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 1996-2000
68. Takatani, T.; Hohenstein, E. G.; Sherrill, C. D. Improvement of the coupled-cluster singles and doubles method via scaling same- and opposite-spin components of the double excitation correlation energy J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 124111
69. Grimme, S. Improved second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory by separate scaling of parallel- and antiparallel-spin pair correlation energies J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 9095-9102
70. Paton, R. S.; Goodman, J. M. Hydrogen bonding and π-stacking: How reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 944-955
71. Hands, M. D.; Slipchenko, L. V. Intermolecular interactions in complex liquids: Effective fragment potential investigation of water-tert-butanol mixtures J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 2775-2786
72. Stone, A. J.; Misquitta, A. J. Charge-transfer in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 473, 201-205
73. Hohenstein, E. G.; Duan, J.; Sherrill, C. D. Origin of the surprising enhancement of electrostatic energies by electron-donating substituents in substituted sandwich benzene dimers J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13244-13247