Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 357-372

  Reiss, Lina A J ^a   Perreau, Ann E ^b   Turner, Christopher W ^c  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hybrid cochlear implant; Pitch; Plasticity; Short electrode cochlear implant; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AGED; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 84865058171     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000341165     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P: Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 1997; 18(suppl):S140-S141. (Pubitemid 27512659)
2. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM: Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res 1996; 99: 139-150. (Pubitemid 26422860)
3. Boex C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kos MI, Pelizzone M: Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006; 7: 110-124. (Pubitemid 43800621)
4. Byrne D, Dillon H, Ching T, Katsch R, Keidser G: NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 37-51. (Pubitemid 33040892)
5. Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijans JH, Axon PR, Kalkmann RK, Boyle P, Baguley DM, Briggs J, Deeks JM, Briaire JJ, Barreau X, Dauman R: Pitch comparisons between electric stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2010; 11: 625-640.
6. Carney E, Schlauch RS: Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007;50:1203-1209. (Pubitemid 350064090)
7. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M: Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 9-21. (Pubitemid 38182601)
8. Dorman MF, Gifford RH, Lewis K, et al.: Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10 mm hybrid electrodes. Int J Audiol 2009; 14: 181-189.
9. Dorman MF, Gifford RH: Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 912-919.
10. Dorman MF, Smith M, Smith L, Parkin JL: The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1677-1679. (Pubitemid 24085773)
11. Dorman MF, Spahr AJ, Loizou PC, et al.: Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS). Ear Hear 2005; 26: 371-380. (Pubitemid 41765191)
12. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA: Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 668-680. (Pubitemid 41330652)
13. Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL: Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 87: 1-39.
14. Efron B, Tibshirani R: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, Chapman and Hall, 1993.
15. Flynn MC, Schmidtke T: Benefits of bimodal stimulation for adults with a cochlear implant. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1273: 227-230.
16. Franklin B: The effect of combining low- and high-frequency passbands on consonant recognition in the hearing impaired. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1975; 18: 719-727.
17. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, et al.: Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1150-1163. (Pubitemid 32734748)
18. Fu QJ, Nogaki G, Galvin JJ 3rd: Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: Implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J Assoc Res Otolarnygol 2005; 6: 180-189. (Pubitemid 40884716)
19. Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, et al.: Hybrid 10 clinical trial: Preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol 2009; 14(suppl):32-38.
20. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electric hearing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 726-1730.
21. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 24: 344-347. (Pubitemid 38797581)
22. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Turner CW, Gantz B: Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11(suppl 1):12-15. (Pubitemid 44629837)
23. Greenwood D: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592-2605. (Pubitemid 20289735)
24. Gstoettner W, Helbig S, Maier N, Kiefer J, Radeloff A, Adunka OF: Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11(suppl 1):49-56. (Pubitemid 44629843)
25. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O: Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electro acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 348-352. (Pubitemid 38797582)
26. Gstoettner WK, van de Heyning P, O'Connor AF, Morera C, Sainz M, Vermeire K, et al.: Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008; 128: 968-975.
27. Helbig S, Baumann U, Helbig M, von Malsen- Waldkirch N, Gstoettner W: A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation - eight months experience. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2008; 70: 359-365.
28. Held R: Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Sci Am 1965; 213: 84-94.
29. Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A: Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 1111-1121. (Pubitemid 41129243)
30. James C, Fraysse B, Deguine O, et al.: Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 2006; 11(suppl 1):57-62. (Pubitemid 44629844)
31. Kiefer J, Gtoettner W, Baumgartner W, Pok SM, Tillein J, et al.: Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 272-280. (Pubitemid 38580856)
32. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Sturzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, et al.: Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 134-144. (Pubitemid 40663391)
33. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG: Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1351-1361. (Pubitemid 40358004)
34. Loizou PC, Mani A, Dorman MF: Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 475-483. (Pubitemid 36835517)
35. Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowtska A, Skarzynski H: Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: A DUET study. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 288-294. (Pubitemid 351640204)
36. McDermott HJ, Sucher C, Simpson A: Electroacoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric comparisons. Audiol Neurootol 2009; 14(suppl 1):2-7.
37. Miller GA, Nicely PE: An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338-352.
38. Nelson PB, Jin SH, Carney AE, Nelson DA: Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normalhearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 961-968. (Pubitemid 36240723)
39. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA: Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
40. Rand TC: Letter: Dichotic release from masking for speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 678- 680.
41. Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurootol 2008; 29: 160-167. (Pubitemid 351170467)
42. Reiss LA, Lowder ML, Karsten SA, Turner CW, Gantz BJ: Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception: A case study. Ear Hear 2011; 32: 536-540.
43. Reiss LAJ, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ: Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007; 8: 241-257. (Pubitemid 46659325)
44. Thornton AR, Raffin MJM: Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 507-518. (Pubitemid 9028176)
45. Tillman WT, Carhart R: An Expanded Test for Speech Discrimination Utilizing CNC Monosyllabic Words: Northwestern University Auditory Test No 6 (Technical Report SAM-TR-66-55). Wright-Patterson AFB, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, 1966.
46. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A: Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 1729- 1735. (Pubitemid 38451327)
47. Turner CW, Souza PE, Forget LN: Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 2568-2576.
48. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W: Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 98-105. (Pubitemid 34280094)
49. Vermeire K, Anderson I, Flynn M, Van de Heyning P: The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear Hear 2008; 29: 76-86.
50. von Helmholtz HEF: Treatise on Physiological Optics (Southall, J.P.C., ed./transl.). Dover, Thoemmes, 1962 (original published in 1909).
51. Von Ilberg C, Keifer J, Tillein J, Pfenningdorff T, Hartmann R, Stuzebecher E, Klinke R: Electro- acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61: 334-340.
52. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ: The psychometric function. 2. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 2001; 63: 1314-1329. (Pubitemid 33610258)
53. Wilson B, Wolford R, Lawson D, Schatzer R: Additional perspectives on speech reception with combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. Third Quarterly Progress Report N01-DC-2-1002. www.rti.org/abstract.cfm? pubid-1168. 2002.
54. Xu L, Thompson CS, Pfingst BE: Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues to speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 3255-3267. (Pubitemid 40675185)