Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 625-640

  Carlyon, Robert P ^a   MacHerey, Olivier ^a   Frijns, Johan H M ^b   Axon, Patrick R ^e   Kalkman, Randy K ^b   Boyle, Patrick ^d   Baguley, David M ^e   Briggs, John ^e   Deeks, John M ^a   Briaire, Jeroen J ^b   Barreau, Xavier ^c   Dauman, René ^c  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^d Advanced Bionics   (United Kingdom)

^e ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cochlear implants; pitch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; PITCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; TONOTOPY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EAR; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650169526     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. PJ Blamey GJ Dooley ES Parisi GM Clark 1996 Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations Hear Res 99 139 150 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7isFOmsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0378-5955(96)00095-0 8970822 (Pubitemid 26422860)
2. C Boëx L Baud G Cosendai A Sigrist M-I Kós M Pelizzone 2006 Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing JARO 7 110 124 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2 16450213 (Pubitemid 43800621)
3. JJ Briaire JHM Frijns 2005 Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential Hear Res 205 143 156 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.020 15953524 (Pubitemid 40813279)
4. JJ Briaire JHM Frijns 2006 The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach Hear Res 214 17 27 10.1016/j.heares.2006.01.015 16520009
5. EM Burns NF Viemeister 1981 Played again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise J Acoust Soc Am 70 1655 1660 10.1121/1.387220
6. RP Carlyon 1997 The effects of two temporal cues on pitch judgements J Acoust Soc Am 102 1097 1105 10.1121/1.419861 (Pubitemid 27332832)
7. RP Carlyon A van Wieringen CJ Long JM Deeks J Wouters 2002 Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing J Acoust Soc Am 112 621 633 10.1121/1.1488660 12186042 (Pubitemid 34855918)
8. R Dauman D Baguley RP Carlyon, et al. 2009 The Bordeaux-Cambridge Programme for unilateral sudden deafness with disabling tinnitus Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abs 32 154
9. MF Dorman T Spahr R Gifford L Loiselle S McKarns T Holden M Skinner C Finley 2007 An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear Jaro J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8 234 240 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1 (Pubitemid 46661565)
10. JHM Frijns JJ Briaire JJ Grote 2001 The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants Otol Neurotol 22 340 349 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrks1yqsQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00129492-200105000- 00012 11347637 (Pubitemid 32422734)
11. DD Greenwood 1990 A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later J Acoust Soc Am 87 2592 2605 1:STN:280: DyaK3czisVCgtA%3D%3D 10.1121/1.399052 2373794 (Pubitemid 20289735)
12. WM Hartmann S McAdams BK Smith 1990 Hearing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex tone J Acoust Soc Am 88 1712 1724 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2Fos1Kisg%3D%3D 10.1121/1.400246 2262628
13. W Jesteadt 1980 An adaptive procedure for subjective judgements Percept Psychophys 28 85 88 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2Fhtlalsg%3D%3D 7413416
14. K Krumbholz RD Patterson D Pressnitzer 2000 The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination J Acoust Soc Am 108 1170 1180 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvlt1CgtQ%3D%3D 10.1121/1.1287843 11008818
15. J Laneau B Boets M Moonen A van Wieringen J Wouters 2005 A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children J Neurosci Meth 142 131 136 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.08.015 (Pubitemid 40138037)
16. MC Liberman 1984 Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift Hear Res 16 33 41 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FnvFOrsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90023-6 6096345 (Pubitemid 15207510)
17. CJ Long I Nimmo-Smith DM Baguley M O'Driscoll R Ramsden SR Otto PR Axon RP Carlyon 2005 Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants Ear Hear 26 251 262 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00002 15937407 (Pubitemid 40917423)
18. HJ McDermott C Sucher A Simpson 2009 Electro-Acoustic stimulation: acoustic and electric pitch comparisons Audiol Neurotol 14 suppl. 1 2 7 10.1159/000206489
19. HJ McDermott CM Sucher 2006 Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli Hear Res 218 81 88 10.1016/j.heares. 2006.05.002 16777362 (Pubitemid 44107667)
20. McFadden D (1986) The curious half octave shift: evidence for a basalward migration of the travelling-wave envelope with increasing intensity. In: Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Colletti V (eds) Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss. Plenum, New York
21. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Carlyon RP (2000) Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent? Acoustics Research Letters Online, http://scitationaiporg/arlo/ 1: 25-30. Last viewed 14 October 2009
22. R Meddis M Hewitt 1991 Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity studied using a computer model of the auditory periphery: pitch identification J Acoust Soc Am 89 2866 2882 10.1121/1.400725
23. C Micheyl BCJ Moore RP Carlyon 1998 The role of excitation-pattern cues and temporal cues in the frequency and modulation-rate discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones J Acoust Soc Am 104 1039 1050 1:STN:280: DyaK1czotVKmtw%3D%3D 10.1121/1.423322 9714923 (Pubitemid 28373190)
24. BCJ Moore 1973 Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones J Acoust Soc Am 54 610 619 1:STN:280:DyaE2c%2FjtlymsQ%3D%3D 10.1121/1.1913640 4754385
25. BCJ Moore BR Glasberg 1996 A revision of Zwicker's loudness model Acustica United with Acta Acustica 82 335 345 (Pubitemid 126513309)
26. RD Patterson 1987 A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception J Acoust Soc Am 82 1560 1586 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FovVagtA%3D%3D 10.1121/1.395146 3693696
27. S Pijl DWF Schwarz 1995 Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear Implant electrodes J Acoust Soc Am 98 886 895 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzntVGjsA%3D%3D 10.1121/1.413514 7642827
28. EC Poulton 1979 Models for the biases in judging sensory magnitude Psychol Bull 86 777 803 1:STN:280:DyaL3c%2FhtlKisQ%3D%3D 10.1037/0033-2909.86.4. 777 482484
29. LAJ Reiss CW Turner SR Erenberg BJ Gantz 2007 Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8 241 257 10.1007/s10162-007-0077-8 17347777 (Pubitemid 46659325)
30. TM Shackleton RP Carlyon 1994 The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination J Acoust Soc Am 95 3529 3540 1:STN:280:DyaK2czitFKlug%3D%3D 10.1121/1.409970 8046144 (Pubitemid 24189504)
31. RV Shannon 1983 Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics Hear Res 11 157 189 1:STN:280: DyaL2c%2FgslOlug%3D%3D 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90077-1 6619003 (Pubitemid 13034055)
32. O Stakhovskaya D Sridhar BH Bonham PA Leake 2007 Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants Jaro J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8 220 233 10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9 (Pubitemid 46659324)
33. B Townshend N Cotter D van Compernolle RL White 1987 Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects J Acoust Soc Am 82 106 115 1:STN:280: DyaL2szgvFeisg%3D%3D 10.1121/1.395554 3624633 (Pubitemid 17114943)
34. BM Verbist JHM Frijns J Geleijns MA van Buchem 2005 Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients Am J Neuroradiol 26 424 429 15709150 (Pubitemid 43073328)
35. Verbist B M, Joemai R M S, Briaire J J, Teeuwisse W M, Veldkamp W J H, Frijns J H M (2010) Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: a clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method. Otology & Neurotology (in press)
36. BM Verbist RMS Joemai WM Teeuwisse WJ Veldkamp J Geleijns JHM Frijns 2008 Evaluation of 4 multisection CT systems in postoperative imaging of a cochlear implant: a human cadaver and phantom study Am J Neuroradiol 29 1382 1388 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crhs1CqsA%3D%3D 10.3174/ajnr.A1108 18483188
37. K Vermeire A Nobbe P Schleich P Nopp MH Voormolen PH Van de Heyning 2008 Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus Hear Res 245 98 106 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.003 18817861
38. F-G Zeng 2002 Temporal pitch in electric hearing Hear Res 174 101 106 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00644-5 12433401 (Pubitemid 35305037)