Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10-mm hybrid electrodes

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 181-189

  Dorman, Michael F ^a,f   Gifford, Rene ^c   Lewis, Kristen ^d   McKarns, Sharon ^a   Ratigan, Jennifer ^a   Spahr, Anthony ^a   Shallop, Jon K ^c   Driscoll, Colin L W ^c   Luetje, Charles ^d   Thedinger, Bradley S ^d   Beatty, Charles W ^c   Syms, Mark ^a   Novak, Mike ^e   Barrs, David ^b   Cowdrey, Lisa ^d   Black, Jennifer ^e   Loiselle, Louise ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona Ear Center   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^e Midwest Ear Institute   (United States)

^f Carle Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hybrid electrodes; Low frequency hearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTROSURGERY; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 63449134164     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000171480     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P: Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 1997; 18:S140-S141.
2. Ching T, Incerti P, Hill M: Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 9-21.
3. Dorman M, Gifford R, Spahr A, McKarns S: The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurootol 2008; 13: 105-112.
4. Dunn C, Tyler R, Witt S: Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 668-680.
5. Gantz B, Turner C: Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 344-347.
6. Gantz B, Turner C, Gfeller K, Lowder M: Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 796-802.
7. Gifford R, Dorman M, McKarns S, Spahr A: Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence intelligibility with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50: 835-843.
8. Gifford R, Shallop J, Peterson A: Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol 2008; 13: 193-205.
9. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O: Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124: 348-352.
10. Hamzavi J, Pok S, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD: Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 61-65.
11. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Sturzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, Tillein J, Ye Q, Gstoettner W: Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 134-144.
12. Kong Y-L, Stickney G, Zeng F-G: Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1351-1361.
13. Luetje C, Thedinger B, Buckler L, Dawson K, Lisbona K: Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 473-478.
14. Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell R, Lawrence D: Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 338-351.
15. Perneger T: What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 1998; 316: 1236-1238.
16. Peterson G, Lehiste I: Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 17: 62-70.
17. Rothman KJ: No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990; 1: 43-46.
18. Shallop J, Arndt P, Turnacliff K: Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1992; 16: 141-148.
19. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A: Preservation of low-frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1273: 239-242.
20. Tyler R, Parkinson A, Wilson B, Witt S, Preece J, Noble W: Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 98-105.
21. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Pfenningdorff T, Hartmann R, Sturzebecker E, Klinke R: Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61: 334-340.
22. Wilson B, Wolford R, Lawson D, Schatzer R: Third Quarterly Progress Report on NIH project N01-DC-2-1002: Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Research Triangle Park, Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, 2002, pp 1-25.