Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Krishnan, Chandramouli ^a,b,c   Ranganathan, Rajiv ^a   Kantak, Shailesh S ^a   Dhaher, Yasin Y ^a,b   Rymer, William Z ^a,b  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait training; Gait velocity; Hemiparesis; Muscle modes; Muscle Synergies; PCA; Skill acquisition; TMS; Variability; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; PARESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; ANKLE; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PARESIS; PHYSICAL EXERTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84865053220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-57     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 20 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 19531254
2. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC, Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004 6 497 525 10.1146/annurev.bioeng. 6.040803.140223 15255778
3. Role of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation. Hidler J, Sainburg R, Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2011 17 42 49 10.1310/sci1701-42 21857778
4. Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm/hand function. Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C, Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008 105 330 336 19629252
5. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 5 13 19109447
6. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR, Stroke 2008 39 1786 1792 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779 18467648
7. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 D006185
8. Improved walking ability and reduced therapeutic stress with an electromechanical gait device. Freivogel S, Schmalohr D, Mehrholz J, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 734 739 10.2340/16501977-0422 19774307
9. Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke. Peurala SH, Airaksinen O, Huuskonen P, Jakala P, Juhakoski M, Sandell K, Tarkka IM, Sivenius J, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 166 173 10.2340/16501977-0304 19229450
10. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG, Phys Ther 2006 86 1466 1478 10.2522/ptj.20050266 17079746
11. Slacking by the human motor system: computational models and implications for robotic orthoses. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Akoner O, Ferris DP, Gordon KE, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009 2009 2129 2132 19964581
12. Allowing intralimb kinematic variability during locomotor training poststroke improves kinematic consistency: a subgroup analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Lewek MD, Cruz TH, Moore JL, Roth HR, Dhaher YY, Hornby TG, Phys Ther 2009 89 829 839 10.2522/ptj.20080180 19520734
13. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR, J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 189 198 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 1202204
14. Reduction of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease by repetitive robot-assisted treadmill training: a pilot study. Lo AC, Chang VC, Gianfrancesco MA, Friedman JH, Patterson TS, Benedicto DF, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010 7 51 10.1186/1743-0003-7-51 20946640
15. Enhancing robotic gait training via augmented feedback. Patritti B, Sicari M, Deming L, Romaguera F, Pelliccio M, Benedetti MG, Nimec D, Bonato P, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010 2010 2271 2274 21097013
16. Robotic gait training in an adult with cerebral palsy: a case report. Patritti BL, Straudi S, Deming LC, Benedetti MG, Nimec DL, Bonato P, PM R 2010 2 71 75 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.10.012 20129516
17. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke. Westlake KP, Patten C, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 18 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18 19523207
18. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Wirz M, Zemon DH, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G, Dietz V, Hornby TG, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 672 680 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004 15827916
19. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 693 700 11321005
20. Path control: a method for patient-cooperative robot-aided gait rehabilitation. Duschau-Wicke A, von Zitzewitz J, Caprez A, Lunenburger L, Riener R, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010 18 38 48 20194054
21. Generalized Elasticities Improve Patient-Cooperative Control of Rehabilitation Robots. Vallery H, Duschau-Wicke A, Riener R, In Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Japan 2009
22. Lee TD, Carnahan H, Bandwidth knowledge of results and motor learning: More than just a relative frequency effect Q J Exp Psychol A 1990 42A 777 789
23. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB, Psychol Bull 1984 95 355 386 6399752
24. Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Sherwood DE, Percept Mot Skills 1988 66 535 542 10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.535 3399331
25. Virtual reality-based approaches to enable walking for people poststroke. Deutsch JE, Mirelman A, Top Stroke Rehabil 2007 14 45 53 18174115
26. Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE, Stroke 2009 40 169 174 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516328 18988916
27. Gait training after stroke: a pilot study combining a gravity-balanced orthosis, functional electrical stimulation, and visual feedback. Krishnamoorthy V, Hsu WL, Kesar TM, Benoit DL, Banala SK, Perumal R, Sangwan V, Binder-Macleod SA, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP, J Neurol Phys Ther 2008 32 192 202 19265761
28. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX). Banala SK, Kim SH, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009 17 2 8 19211317
29. Computerized visual feedback: an adjunct to robotic-assisted gait training. Banz R, Bolliger M, Colombo G, Dietz V, Lunenburger L, Phys Ther 2008 88 1135 1145 10.2522/ptj.20070203 18772279
30. Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals. Kim SH, Banala SK, Brackbill EA, Agrawal SK, Krishnamoorthy V, Scholz JP, Exp Brain Res 2010 202 809 824 10.1007/s00221-010-2187-5 20186402
31. Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM, Exp Brain Res 2003 152 281 292 10.1007/s00221-003-1574-6 12904934
32. Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. Clark DJ, Ting LH, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, J Neurophysiol 2010 103 844 857 10.1152/jn.00825.2009 20007501
33. Extracting synergies in gait: Using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies. Ranganathan R, Krishnan C, J Neurophysiol 2012 108 1537 1544 10.1152/jn.01112.2011 22723678
34. Corticospinal responses of quadriceps are abnormally coupled with hip adductors in chronic stroke survivors. Krishnan C, Dhaher Y, Exp Neurol 2012 233 400 407 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.007 22116042
35. Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors. Madhavan S, Krishnan C, Jayaraman A, Rymer WZ, Stinear JW, Clin Neurophysiol 2011 122 1588 1594 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.01.011 21333591
36. Metabolic and mechanical energy costs of reducing vertical center of mass movement during gait. Gordon KE, Ferris DP, Kuo AD, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 136 144 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.014 19154840
37. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J, J Rehabil Med 2005 37 75 82 10.1080/16501970410017215 15788341
38. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E, Stroke 2007 38 349 354 10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb 17204680
39. Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: a pilot study. Plummer P, Behrman AL, Duncan PW, Spigel P, Saracino D, Martin J, Fox E, Thigpen M, Kautz SA, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007 21 137 151 10.1177/1545968306295559 17312089
40. Identification of healthy elderly fallers and non-fallers by gait analysis under dual-task conditions. Toulotte C, Thevenon A, Watelain E, Fabre C, Clin Rehabil 2006 20 269 276 10.1191/0269215506cr929oa 16634347
41. Validity of motor tasks for predicting running ability in acquired brain injury. Williams G, Goldie P, Brain Inj 2001 15 831 841 10.1080/ 02699050110048546 11516351
42. Mechanical and metabolic requirements for active lateral stabilization in human walking. Donelan JM, Shipman DW, Kram R, Kuo AD, J Biomech 2004 37 827 835 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.06.002 15111070
43. Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Balasubramanian CK, Bowden MG, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 43 49 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.004 17207674
44. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Stroke 2006 37 872 876 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d 16456121
45. Minimal detectable change for gait variables collected during treadmill walking in individuals post-stroke. Kesar TM, Binder-Macleod SA, Hicks GE, Reisman DS, Gait Posture 2011 33 314 317 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.024 21183350
46. The effect of strength training on the force of twitches evoked by corticospinal stimulation in humans. Carroll TJ, Barton J, Hsu M, Lee M, Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2009 197 161 173 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01992.x
47. The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans. Carroll TJ, Riek S, Carson RG, J Physiol 2002 544 641 652 10.1113/jphysiol.2002. 024463 12381833
48. Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. Jensen JL, Marstrand PC, Nielsen JB, J Appl Physiol 2005 99 1558 1568 10.1152/japplphysiol.01408.2004 15890749
49. Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R, Res Q Exerc Sport 1994 65 316 323 7886280
50. Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam. Domingo A, Ferris DP, Gait Posture 2009 30 464 468 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.114 19674900
51. Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: when a dual task becomes a single task. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Swinnen SS, Walter C, J Mot Behav 2001 33 103 112 10.1080/00222890109601906 11265060
52. Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 2001 414 69 73
53. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA, J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990 16 677 691
54. Influence of augmented feedback on coordination strategies. Ranganathan R, Newell KM, J Mot Behav 2009 41 317 330 10.3200/JMBR.41.4.317-330 19508958
55. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995 76 406 412 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0 7741609