Patch tests with fragrance mix II and its components

Dermatitis

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 71-74

  Pónyai, Györgyi ^a   Németh, Ilona ^a   Altmayer, Anita ^b   Nagy, Gabriella ^c   Irinyi, Beatrix ^d   Battyáni, Zita ^e,f   Temesvári, Erzsébet ^a  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^c Centre of Dermatology Semmelweis Medical Centre of Miskolc   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^f Kaposi Mor Teaching Hospital   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALLERGEN; CINNAMALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; CITRAL; CITRONELLOL; COUMARIN; FARNESOL; FRAGRANCE; HYDROXYISOHEXYL 3 CYCLOHEXENE CARBOXALDEHYDE; PROPOLIS; ROSIN; SESQUITERPENE LACTONE; TAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; CONTACT ALLERGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUNGARY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYROXYLON; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPTOM; WOOD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865017830     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31824a6104     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Frosch P, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivitiy to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:216-225.
2. Frosch P, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:207-215.
3. Firooz A, Nassiri-Kashani M, Khatami A, et al. Fragrance contact allergy in Iran. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24:1437-1441.
4. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Andersen KE, et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:333-342.
5. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003; 14:59-62.
6. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004; 15:176-183.
7. Uter W, Rämsch C, Aberer W, et al. The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 - results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis 2009;61:31-38.
8. Uter W, Geier J, Frosch P, et al. Contact allergy to fragrances: current patch test results (2005-2008) from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63:254-261.
9. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, et al. Contact allergy to hairdressing allergens in female hairdressers and clients - current data from the IVDK, 2003-2006. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007;5:993-1001.
10. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menné T, et al. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:78-85.
11. Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, et al. Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK): experiences with fragrance mix II - the German perspective. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(Suppl 1):12.
12. Johansen JD. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:789-798.
13. Wetter DA, Yiannias JA, Prakash AV, et al. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:789-798.
14. Nardelli A, Carbonez A, Ottoy W, et al. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:134-144.
15. van Oosten EJ, Schuttelaar M-LA, Coenraads PJ. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2009;61:217-223.
16. Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT, et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-test population over a 17-year period. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142:279-283.
17. Baxter KF, Wilkinson SM, Kirk SJ. Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene- carboxyaldehyde (Lyral®) as a fragrance allergen in the UK. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:117-118.
18. Belsito DV, Fower JF Jr, Sassevillie D, et al. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in select North American population. Dermatitis 2006;17:23-28.
19. Bruze M, Andersen KE, Goossens A. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58: 129-133.
20. Buckley DA. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the UK. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:295-300.
21. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, et al. Lyral® has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:295-297.
22. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current European regulation. Results of the IVDK and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:1-10.
23. Storrs FJ. Fragrance. Dermatitis 2007;18:78-81.
24. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 2003;149: 986-989.
25. Devos SA, Constandt L, Tupker RA, et al. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to Fragrance mix. Dermatitis 2008;19:43-47.