Fragrance contact allergy in Iran

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1437-1441

  Firooz, A ^a   Nassiri Kashani, M ^a   Khatami, A ^a   Gorouhi, F ^a   Babakoohi, S ^a   Montaser Kouhsari, L ^a   Davari, P ^a   Dowlati, Y ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; fragrances; Iran; patch test

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; FRAGRANCE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRAGRANCE CONTACT ALLERGY; HUMAN; IRAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; IRAN; MALE; ODORS;

EID: 78449292706     PISSN: 09269959     EISSN: 14683083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03665.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 911-918.
2. Tomar J, Jain VK, Aggarwal K, et al. Contact allergies to cosmetics: testing with 52 cosmetic ingredients and personal products. J Dermatol 2005; 32: 951-955.
3. De Groot AC, Frosch PJ,. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 57-86.
4. Johansen JD,. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4: 789-798.
5. Buckley DA, Rycroft RJ, White IR, et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in patch-tested patients increases with their age. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 986-989.
6. Larsen WG, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis - a worldwide multicenter investigation (part III). Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 141-146.
7. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, et al. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50: 65-76.
8. Castanedo-Tardan MP, Zug KA,. Patterns of cosmetic contact allergy. Dermatol Clin 2009; 27: 265-280, vi.
9. Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 207-215.
10. Bruze M, Andersen KE, Goossens A,. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 129-133.
11. Buckley DA,. Fragrance ingredient labelling in products on sale in the U.K. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 295-300.
12. Williams HC, Burney PG, Hay RJ, et al. The U.K. Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. I. Derivation of a minimum set of discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1994; 131: 383-396.
13. Bruze M, Goossens A, Gruvberger B,. Recommendation to include methyldibromo glutaronitrile in the European standard patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 24-28.
14. Wahlberg JE,. Patch testing. In:, Rycroft RJGMT, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2001: 435-468.
15. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, et al. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 200-209.
16. Kashani MN, Gorouhi F, Behnia F, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 154-158.
17. Firooz A, Gorouhi F, Davari P, et al. Frequency of contact sentization to European Standard Series (ESS) in contact and/or atopic dermatitis patients in Rasht, Ahwaz,Kerman and Hamedan. Iranian Journal of Dermatology 2007; 10: 187-196.
18. Nardelli A, Carbonez A, Ottoy W, et al. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 134-141.
19. Van Oosten EJ, Schuttelaar ML, Coenraads PJ,. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 61: 217-223.
20. Heydorn S, Menne T, Johansen JD,. Fragrance allergy and hand eczema - a review. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 59-66.
21. Li LF, Liu G, Wang J,. Patch test in Chinese patients with cosmetic allergic contact dermatitis to common cosmetic allergens from a European cosmetic series. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 50-54.
22. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part I). Am J Contact Dermat 1996; 7: 77-83.
23. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part II). Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44: 344-346.
24. Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1969; 55: 17-35.
25. Johansen JD, Andersen TF, Veien N, et al. Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Do clinical tests correspond to patients' self-reported problems?. Acta Derm Venereol 1997; 77: 149-153.
26. Zirwas MJ, Bechtel M,. Allergic contact dermatitis to a perfume containing lyral. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: S97-S98.
27. Buckley DA, Basketter DA, Kan-King-Yu D, et al. Atopy and contact allergy to fragrance: allergic reactions to the fragrance mix I (the Larsen mix). Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59: 220-225.
28. Hussain I, Rani Z, Rashid T, et al. Suitability of the European standard series of patch test allergens in Pakistani patients. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 50-51.
29. Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Ozkaya-Bayazit E,. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 46: 17-23.