Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in a select North American population

Dermatitis

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 23-28

  Belsito, Donald V ^a   Fowler Jr , Joseph F ^a   Sasseville, Denis ^a   Marks Jr , James G ^a   De Leo, Vincent A ^a   Storrs, Frances J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3 (4 HYDROXY 4 METHYLPENTYL)CYCLOHEXENE 1 CARBOXALDEHYDE; 4 (4 HYDROXY 4 METHYLPENTYL)CYCLOHEXENE 1 CARBOXALDEHYDE; ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; BALSAM PERU; CINNAMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; JASMINE ABSOLUTE; KOVANOL; LYRAL; PETROLATUM; PLANT EXTRACT; TEA TREE OIL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; YLANG YLANG OIL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CANADA; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; ECZEMA; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; JASMINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STUDENT T TEST; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLERGENS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY, DELAYED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH AMERICA; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PREVALENCE; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 33645905116     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2006.05027     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch-Test Results, 1998-2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14:59-62.
2. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004;15:1-8.
3. De Groot AC, van der Kely AMJ, Bruynzeel DP, et al. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:139-40.
4. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M, et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (part 1). Am J Contact Dermat 1996;7:77-83.
5. Fenn RS. Aroma chemical usage trends in modern perfumery. Perfumer Flavorist 1989;14:1-10.
6. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menné T, et al. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999;141:1076-83.
7. Heydorn S, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, et al. Fragrance allergy in patients with hand eczema-a clinical study. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:317-23.
8. Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menné T, et al. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:78-85.
9. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, et al. Lyral has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:295-7.
10. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Andersen KE, et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:333-42.
11. Baxter KF, Wilkinson SM, Kirk SJ. Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene- carboxaldehyde (Lyral) as a fragrance allergen in the UK. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:117-8.
12. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Svedman C, et al. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde-known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen. Contact Dermatitis 2003:48:310-6.
13. Shaffer MP, Belsito DV. Allergic contact dermatitis to glutaraldehyde in health-care workers. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:150-6.
14. Suneja T, Belsito DV. Thimerosal in the detection of clinically relevant allergic contact reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:23-7.
15. Heydorn S, Menné T, Andersen KE, et al. The fragrance hand immersion study-an experimental model simulating real-life exposure for allergic contact dermatitis on the hands. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:324-30.
16. Velen NK, Rosner K, Skovgaard GL. Is tea tree oil an important contact allergen? Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:378-9.
17. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, et al. Association between occupational and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med 2001;58:392-8.
18. Handley J, Burrows D. Allergic contact dermatitis from the synthetic fragrances Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:288-90.
19. Hendriks SA, Bousema MT, van Ginkel CJW. Allergic contact dermatitis from the fragrance ingredient Lyral in underarm deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:119.
20. Rastogi SC, Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, et al. Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:29-35.
21. Skold M, Borje A, Matura M, Karlberg AT. Studies on the autoxidation and sensitizing capacity of the fragrance chemical linalool, identifying a linalool hydroperoxide. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:267-72.
22. Matura M, Goossens A, Bordalo O, et al. Patch testing with oxidized R-(+)-limonene and its hydroperoxide fraction. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:15-21.
23. Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Felter SP, et al. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:333-40.
24. Griem P, Goebel C, Scheffler H. Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization potency data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003;38:269-90.
25. Felter SP, Robinson MK, Basketter DA, Gerberkick GF. A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:257-66.