Fragrance

Dermatitis

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-7

  Storrs, Frances J ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; CINNAMALDEHYDE; CINNAMYL ALCOHOL; COUMARIN; ETHYLENEDIAMINE; EUGENOL; FRAGRANCE; GERANIOL; HYDROXYCITRONELLAL; ISOEUGENOL; MYCOLOG;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVERNIA PRUNASTRI; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORBIDITY; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN ALLERGY;

ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 34047192986     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2007.06053     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Johansen JD. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:789-98.
2. Simpson EL, Law SV, Storrs FJ. Prevalence of botanical extract allergy in patients with contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 2004;15:67-72.
3. Larsen WG. Allergic contact dermatitis to the perfume in Mycolog® cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979;1:131-3.
4. Larsen WG. Perfume dermatitis, a study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:623-6.
5. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Burrows D, et al. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:266-72.
6. deGroot AC, Frosch PJ. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:57-86.
7. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004;15:176-83.
8. Buckley DA, Wakelin SH, Seed PT, et al. The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:203-4.
9. Johnke H, Norberg LA, Vach W, et al. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 51:141-7.
10. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14:59-62.
11. Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menne T. Exposure to selected fragrance materials. A case study of fragrance-mix-positive eczema patients. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:106-10.
12. Frosch PJ, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52: 216-25.
13. Basketter DA, McFadden J. Current perspectives on fragrance allergy. J Environ Dermatol 2005;12:178-83.
14. Belsito DV, Fowler JF Jr, Sasseville D, et al. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in a select North American population. Dermatitis 2006;17:23-8.
15. European Union cosmetics directive 76/768/EEC-7th amendment (Council Directive 2003/15/EC). Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels, Belgium. 2003.
16. Gottschalck TE, Mcewen GN, editors. International cosmetic ingredient dictionary and handbook; 11th edition. Washington DC: Cosmetic Toiletry and Fragrance Association; 2006.
17. Corea NV, Basketter DA, Clapp C, et al. Fragrance allergy: assessing the risk from washed fabrics. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:48-53.
18. Smith L, Middleton J, Bickers D, Vey M. Roles in the safe use of fragrance materials: RIFM and IFRA's process and guidelines for fragrance standards. Perfumer Flavorist 2005;30:46-51.