Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances: I. Reactivity to 14 frequently used chemicals

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 78-85

  Frosch, P J ^a   Johansen, J D ^b   Menne T ^b   Pirker, C ^a   Rastogi, S C ^c   Andersen, K E ^d   Bruze, M ^e   Goossens, A ^f   Lepoittevin, J P ^g   White, I R ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^d ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^h ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contact allergy; Fragrance mix; Fragrances; History of fragrance sensitivity; Lyral ; Patch testing

Indexed keywords

4 (4 HYDROXY 4 METHYLPENTYL) 3 CYCLOHEXENECARBOXALDEHYDE; CINNAMALDEHYDE; CITRAL; CITRONELLOL; COUMARIN; FARNESOL; FRAGRANCE; GALAXOLIDE; LINALOOL; MYRISTIC ACID ISOPROPYL ESTER; SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLERGENICITY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONTACT ALLERGY; CROSS REACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATCH TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INCIDENCE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS;

EID: 0036702504     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. De Groot A C, Frosch P J. Adverse reactions to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 57-86.
2. Johansen J D, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: A 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 18-23.
3. De Groot A C, van der Kley A M J, Bruynzeel D P et al. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 139-140.
4. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menné T et al. Lyral® is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances. Br J Dermatol 1999: 141: 1076-1083.
5. De Groot A C, Weyland J W, Nater J P. Unwanted Effects of Cosmetics and Drugs Used in Dermatology, 3rd Edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
6. Wahlberg J E. Patch testing. In: Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J, Lepoittevin J P, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd Edn. Heidelberg: Springer, 2001: 435-468.
7. Larsen W G. Perfume dermatitis. A study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol 1977: 113: 623-626.
8. Somogyi L. The flavour and fragrance industry serving a global market. Chem Ind 1996: 170-173.
9. Geier J, Brasch J, Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Pirker C, Frosch P J. Lyral® is included in the patch test standard series in Germany. Contact Dermatitis, in press.
10. Basketter D A, Blaikie L, Dearman R J et al. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 344-348.
11. Malten K E, van Ketel W G, Nater J P, Liem D H. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 1-10.
12. Basketter D. Quenching: Fact or fiction? Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 253-258.
13. Rastogi S C, Lepoittevin J P, Johansen J D et al. Fragrances and other materials in deodorants: Search for potentially sensitizing molecules using combined GC-MS and structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 293-303.
14. Rastogi S C, Heydorn S, Johansen J D, Basketter D A. Fragrance chemicals in domestic and occupational products. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 221-225.
15. Hemmer W, Focke M, Leitner B, Götz M, Jarisch R. Axillary dermatitis from farnesol in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 168-169.
16. Goossens A, Merckx L. Allergic contact dermatitis from farnesol in a deodorant. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 179-180.
17. De Groot A C. Contact allergy to cosmetics: Causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 17: 26-34.
18. Sugai T. Group study IV - Farnesol and lily aldehyde. Environ Dermatol 1994: 1: 213-214.
19. Haustein U F, Herrmann J, Hoppe U, Engel W, Sauermann G. Wachstums- hemmung coryneformer Bakterien durch ein naturidentisches Dreistoff- gemisch (Farnesol, Glycerinmonolaurat, Phenoxyethanol: HGQ). Akt Dermatol 1991: 17: 359-361.
20. Hausen B M, Evers P, Stüwe H T, König W A, Wollenweber E. Propolis allergy (IV). Studies with further sensitizers from propolis and constituents common to propolis, poplar buds and balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 34-44.
21. Kunkeler A C M, Wejland J W, Bruynzeel D P. The role of coumarin in patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 327-328.
22. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: A worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 7: 77-83.
23. Mutterer V, Giménez Arnau E, Lepoittevin J P et al. Identification of coumarin as the sensitizer in a patient sensitive to her own perfume but negative to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 196-199.
24. Hausen M B, Berger M. The sensitizing capacity of coumarins (III). Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 141-147.
25. Kaidbey K H, Kligman A M. Photomaximization test for identifying photoallergic contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis 1980: 6: 161-169.
26. Basketter D, Selbie E, Scholes E W et al. Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization. Buehler and local lymph node assays. Food Chem Toxicol 1993: 31: 63-67.
27. De Groot A C, Bruynzeel D P, Bos J D et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988: 124: 1525-1529.
28. Keil H. Contact dermatitis due to oil of citronellal. J Invest Dermatol 1947: 8: 327.
29. De Groot A C. Adverse Reactions to Cosmetics. Thesis, University of Groningen, 1988.
30. Larsen W G, Nakayama H, Fisher T et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: A worldwide multicenter investigation (Part II). Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 344-346.
31. Arnau Giménez E, Andersen K E, Bruze M et al. Identification of Lilial® as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 351-358.
32. Larsen W G. Allergic contact dermatitis to the fragrance material lilial. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 158-1959.
33. Johansen J D, Andersen T V, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen K E, Menné T. Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1997: 77: 149-153.
34. Nielsen N H, Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study. Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol 1992: 72: 456-460.
35. Nielsen N H, Linneberg A, Menné T et al. Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population. Two cross-sectional survey eight years apart (The Copenhagen Allergy Study). Acta Derm Venereol 2001: 81: 31-34.
36. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O for the IVDK study group. Epidemiology of contact allergy: An estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug utilisation research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis, in press.
37. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Burrows D et al. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 266-272.
38. Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghoj P et al. Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 21: 291-299.
39. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O. Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: A multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med 2001: 58: 392-398.
40. Andersen K E, Johansen J D, Bruze M et al. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001: 170: 166-171.
41. Johansen J D, Bruze M, Andersen K E et al. The repeated open application test. Suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 39: 95-96.
42. Menné T, Johansen J D et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in man - Experimental and quantitative aspects. In: Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J, Lepoittevin J P, eds. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd Edn. Heidelberg: Springer, 2001: 237-248.