Analyzing high dimensional toxicogenomic data using consensus clustering

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 8413-8421

  Gao, Ce ^a   Weisman, David ^b   Gou, Na ^a   Ilyin, Valentine ^c   Gu, April Z ^a  

^a Northeastern University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARRAY SYSTEMS; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CLUSTERING RESULTS; CONSENSUS CLUSTERING; CRITICAL FACTORS; DATA FEATURE; DATA SETS; E. COLI; ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; HIGH DIMENSIONAL DATA; HIGH THROUGHPUT EXPERIMENTS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; INPUT DATAS; NOISY DATA; REPORTER GENE; RESAMPLING; ROBUST CONSENSUS; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; TIME POINTS; TIME-SERIES DATA; TOXICITY ASSESSMENT; TOXICOGENOMICS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; VALIDATION METHODS; WHOLE CELL;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DATA COMPRESSION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENES; IMPORTANCE SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

THROUGHPUT;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLIFORM BACTERIUM; DATA SET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENOMICS; MODEL VALIDATION; SAMPLING; TIME SERIES; TOXICITY TEST; TOXICOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NONHUMAN; REPORTER GENE; TOXICOGENOMIC; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WHOLE CELL;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; TOXICOGENETICS;

EID: 84864697003     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es3000454     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Krewski, D.; Acosta, J. D.; Andersen, M.; Anderson, H.; Bailar, I. I. I. J. C.; Boekelheide, K.; Brent, R.; Charnley, G.; Cheung, V. G.; Green, J. S.; Kelsey, K. T.; Kerkvliet, N. I.; Li, A. A.; McCray, L.; Meyer, O.; Patterson, R. D.; Pennie, W.; Scala, R. A.; Solomon, G. M.; Stephens, M. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy J. Toxicol. Environ. Health: Part B 2010, 13 (2-4) 51-138
2. Newton, R. K.; Aardema, M.; Aubrecht, J. The utility of DNA microarrays for characterizing genotoxicity Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112 (4) 420-2
3. Elad, T.; Lee, J. H.; Belkin, S.; Gu, M. B. Microbial whole-cell arrays Microb. Biotechnol. 2008, 1 (2) 137-48
4. Dix, D. J.; Houck, K. A.; Martin, M. T.; Richard, A. M.; Setzer, R. W.; Kavlock, R. J. The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 95 (1) 5-12
5. Simmons, S. O.; Fan, C.-Y.; Ramabhadran, R. Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 111 (2) 202-225
6. Van Dyk, T. K.; Wei, Y.; Hanafey, M. K.; Dolan, M.; Reeve, M. J. G.; Rafalski, J. A.; Rothman-Denes, L. B.; LaRossa, R. A. A genomic approach to gene fusion technology Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98 (5) 2555-2560
7. Sedykh, A.; Zhu, H.; Tang, H.; Zhang, L.; Richard, A.; Rusyn, I.; Tropsha, A. Use of in vitro HTS-derived concentration-response data as biological descriptors improves the accuracy of QSAR models of in vivo toxicity Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 119, 3
8. Huang, R.; Southall, N.; Cho, M.-H.; Xia, M.; Inglese, J.; Austin, C. P. Characterization of diversity in toxicity mechanism using in vitro cytotoxicity assays in quantitative high throughput screening Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21 (3) 659-667
9. Rallo, R.; France, B.; Liu, R.; Nair, S.; George, S.; Damoiseaux, R.; Giralt, F.; Nel, A.; Bradley, K.; Cohen, Y. Self-organizing map analysis of toxicity-related cell signaling pathways for metal and metal oxide nanoparticles Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (4) 1695-1702
10. George, S.; Xia, T.; Rallo, R.; Zhao, Y.; Ji, Z.; Lin, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; France, B.; Schoenfeld, D.; Damoiseaux, R.; Liu, R.; Lin, S.; Bradley, K. A.; Cohen, Y.; Nel, A. E. Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials ACS Nano 2011, 5 (3) 1805-1817
11. Gou, N.; Onnis-Hayden, A.; Gu, A. Z. Mechanistic toxicity assessment of nanomaterials by whole-cell-array stress genes expression analysis Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (15) 5964-5970
12. Gou, N.; Gu, A. Z. A new transcriptional effect level index (TELI) for toxicogenomics-based toxicity assessment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (12) 5410-5417
13. Gu, M. B.; Mitchell, R. J.; Kim, B. C. Whole-cell-based biosensors for environmental biomonitoring and application Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 2004, 87, 269-305
14. Lee, J. H.; Youn, C. H.; Kim, B. C.; Gu, M. B. An oxidative stress-specific bacterial cell array chip for toxicity analysis Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22 (9-10) 2223-2229
15. Cheng Vollmer, A.; Van Dyk, T. K., Stress responsive bacteria: Biosensors as environmental monitors. In Advances in Microbial Physiology; Poole, Ed.; Academic Press, 2004; Vol. 49, pp 131-174.
16. Jiang, D.; Pei, J.; Ramanathan, M.; Tang, C.; Zhang, A. Mining coherent gene clusters from gene-sample-time microarray data. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; ACM: Seattle, WA, 2004; pp 430-439.
17. Ioannidis, J. P. A.; Khoury, M. J. Improving validation practices in "omics" research Science 2011, 334 (6060) 1230-1232
18. Harper, G.; Pickett, S. D. Methods for mining HTS data Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11 (15-16) 694-699
19. Afshari, C. A.; Hamadeh, H. K.; Bushel, P. R. The evolution of bioinformatics in toxicology: Advancing toxicogenomics Toxicol. Sci. 2011, 120 (suppl 1) S225-S237
20. Daxin, J.; Chun, T.; Aidong, Z. Cluster analysis for gene expression data: a survey IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 2004, 16 (11) 1370-1386
21. D'Haeseleer, P. How does gene expression clustering work? Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23 (12) 1499-1501
22. Jain, A. K.; Dubes, R. C. Algorithms for Clustering Data; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
23. Tamayo, P.; Slonim, D.; Mesirov, J.; Zhu, Q.; Kitareewan, S.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Lander, E. S.; Golub, T. R. Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96 (6) 2907-2912
24. Inglese, J.; Auld, D. S.; Jadhav, A.; Johnson, R. L.; Simeonov, A.; Yasgar, A.; Zheng, W.; Austin, C. P. Quantitative high-throughput screening: A titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103 (31) 11473-11478
25. Bar-Joseph, Z.; Demaine, E. D.; Gifford, D. K.; Srebro, N.; Hamel, A. M.; Jaakkola, T. S. K-ary clustering with optimal leaf ordering for gene expression data Bioinformatics 2003, 19 (9) 1070-1078
26. Törönen, P.; Kolehmainen, M.; Wong, G.; Castrén, E. Analysis of gene expression data using self-organizing maps FEBS Lett. 1999, 451 (2) 142-146
27. Mangiameli, P.; Chen, S. K.; West, D. A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods Eur. J. Operat. Res. 1996, 93 (2) 402-417
28. Halkidi, M.; Batistakis, Y.; Vazirgiannis, M. On clustering validation techniques J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 2001, 17 (2) 107-145
29. Gibbons, F. D.; Roth, F. P. Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation Genome Res. 2002, 12 (10) 1574-1581
30. Datta, S.; Datta, S. Methods for evaluating clustering algorithms for gene expression data using a reference set of functional classes BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7 (1) 397
31. Datta, S.; Datta, S. Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression data Bioinformatics 2003, 19 (4) 459-466
32. Monti, S.; Tamayo, P.; Mesirov, J.; Golub, T. Consensus clustering: A resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data Mach. Learn. 2003, 52 (1) 91-118
33. Nguyen, T. T.; Nowakowski, R. S.; Androulakis, I. P. Unsupervised selection of highly coexpressed and noncoexpressed genes using a consensus clustering approach OMICS 2009, 13 (3) 219-237
34. Seiler, M.; Huang, C. C.; Szalma, S.; Bhanot, G. ConsensusCluster: A software tool for unsupervised cluster discovery in numerical data OMICS 2010, 14 (1) 109-113
35. Wilkerson, M. D.; Hayes, D. N. ConsensusClusterPlus: A class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking Bioinformatics 2010, 26 (12) 1572-3
36. Onnis-Hayden, A.; Weng, H.; He, M.; Hansen, S.; Ilyin, V.; Lewis, K.; Gu, A. Z. Prokaryotic real-time gene expression profiling for toxicity assessment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (12) 4574-4581
37. Zaslaver, A.; Bren, A.; Ronen, M.; Itzkovitz, S.; Kikoin, I.; Shavit, S.; Liebermeister, W.; Surette, M. G.; Alon, U. A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli Nat. Methods 2006, 3 (8) 623-628
38. Kim, S. Y.; Lee, J. W. Ensemble clustering method based on the resampling similarity measure for gene expression data Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2007, 16 (6) 539-564
39. Vesanto, J. H.; Alhoniemi, E.; Parhankangas, J. Self-organizing map in MATLAB: the SOM Toolbox. In Proceedings of the MATLAB DSP Conference 1999, Espoo, Finland, November 16-17, 1999; 1999; pp 35-40.
40. Ultsch, A.; Siemon, H. P. Kohonen's self organizing feature maps for exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of International Neural Networks Conference, 1990; Kluwer Academic Press, 1990; pp 305-308.
41. Khil, P. P.; Camerini-Otero, R. D. Over 1000 genes are involved in the DNA damage response of Escherichia coli Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 44 (1) 89-105
42. Cantoni, O.; Brandi, G.; Salvaggio, L.; Cattabeni, F. Molecular mechanisms of hydrogen peroxide cytotoxicity Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 1989, 25 (1) 69-73
43. Van Dyk, T. K.; Smulski, D. R.; Reed, T. R.; Belkin, S.; Vollmer, A. C.; LaRossa, R. A. Responses to toxicants of an Escherichia coli strain carrying a uspA'::lux genetic fusion and an E. coli strain carrying a grpE'::lux fusion are similar Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61 (11) 4124-7
44. Soares, A.; Guieysse, B.; Jefferson, B.; Cartmell, E.; Lester, J. N. Nonylphenol in the environment: A critical review on occurrence, fate, toxicity and treatment in wastewaters Environ. Int. 2008, 34 (7) 1033-49
45. Reddy, A. R. N.; Reddy, Y. N.; Himabindu, V.; Krishna, D. R. Induction of oxidative stress and cytotoxicity by carbon nanomaterials is dependent on physical properties Toxicol. Ind. Health 2011, 27 (1) 3-10
46. Bello, D.; Hsieh, S.-F.; Schmidt, D.; Rogers, E. Nanomaterials properties vs. biological oxidative damage: Implications for toxicity screening and exposure assessment Nanotoxicology 2009, 3 (3) 249-261
47. de Bodt, E.; Cottrell, M.; Verleysen, M. Statistical tools to assess the reliability of self-organizing maps Neural Networks 2002, 15 (8-9) 967-978
48. Vecitis, C. D.; Zodrow, K. R.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M. Electronic-structure-dependent bacterial cytotoxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes ACS Nano 2010, 4 (9) 5471-9
49. Liu, S.; Ng, A. K.; Xu, R.; Wei, J.; Tan, C. M.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y. Antibacterial action of dispersed single-walled carbon nanotubes on Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis investigated by atomic force microscopy Nanoscale 2010, 2 (12) 2744-50
50. Yang, C.; Mamouni, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, L. Antimicrobial activity of single-walled carbon nanotubes: Length effect Langmuir 2010, 26 (20) 16013-9
51. 2 nanoparticles in anatase and rutile crystal phase Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 141 (1-3) 3-15
52. Ahn, J.-M.; Hwang, E. T.; Youn, C.-H.; Banu, D. L.; Kim, B. C.; Niazi, J. H.; Gu, M. B. Prediction and classification of the modes of genotoxic actions using bacterial biosensors specific for DNA damages Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 25 (4) 767-772
53. Saeys, Y.; Inza, I.; Larrañaga, P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics Bioinformatics 2007, 23 (19) 2507-2517