Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: A multicenter study

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2808-2816

  Kitagawa, Kakuya ^a   Sakuma, Hajime ^a   Nagata, Motonori ^a   Okuda, Shigeo ^b   Hirano, Masaharu ^c   Tanimoto, Akihiro ^b   Matsusako, Masaki ^d   Lima, Joao A C ^e   Kuribayashi, Sachio ^e   Takeda, Kan ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d ST LUKE'S INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Magneticr esonance imaging; Multicenter trial; Myocardial perfusion; Pharmacological stress

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY STENOSIS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; JAPAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 56349139480     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1097-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR et al (2007) Significant coronary artery stenosis: Comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 244:112-120
2. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S et al (2006) Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1946-1950
3. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 28:2354-2360
4. Nassenstein K, Waltering KU, Kelle S et al (2008) Magnetic resonance coronary angiography with vasovisttrade mark: In-vivo T(1) estimation to improve image quality of navigator and breath-hold techniques. Eur Radiol 18:103-109
5. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al (2000) Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 101:1379-1383
6. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM et al (2001) Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 104:2412-2416
7. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al (2002) Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346:1948-1953
8. Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS et al (2006) Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1427-1432
9. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M et al (2003) Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229:209-216
10. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al (2001) Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: A comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103:2230-2235
11. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432-437
12. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al (2004) Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: A multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110:732-737
13. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R et al (2004) Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: First European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 25:1657-1665
14. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: Comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480-489
15. Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:95-102
16. Meyer C, Strach K, Thomas D et al (2008) High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 18:226-233
17. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343-1353
18. Foo TK, Wu KC, Azevedo CF et al (2004) Partial fourier steady-state free precession (FIESTA) first-pass perfusion with improved image quality and efficient spatial coverage. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 11:1
19. Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ et al (2000) Effects of intravenous and intracoronary adenosine 5′-triphosphate as compared with adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 101:318-323
20. Miyagawa M, Kumano S, Sekiya M et al (1995) Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:1196-1201
21. Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM et al (2006) Task Force 12: Training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]): Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:910-914
22. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P et al (2002) Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:641-652
23. Arai AE (2000) Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 11:383-398
24. Strach K, Meyer C, Thomas D et al (2007) High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: Comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol 17:1829-1835
25. Wang Y, Moin K, Akinboboye O et al (2005) Myocardial first pass perfusion: Steady-state free precession versus spoiled gradient echo and segmented echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 54:1123-1129
26. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: An imaging study. Lancet 361:374-379
27. Barbier CE, Bjerner T, Johansson L et al (2006) Myocardial scars more frequent than expected: Magnetic resonance imaging detects potential risk group. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:765-771
28. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ et al (2006) Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1630-1638
29. Cury RC, Cattani CA, Gabure LA et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 240:39-45
30. Erbel R, Heusch G (1999) Coronary microembolization - its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions. Herz 24:558-575
31. Heusch G, Schulz R, Haude M et al (2004) Coronary microembolization. J Mol Cell Cardiol 37:23-31
32. Kwong RY, Chan AK, Brown KA et al (2006) Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 113:2733-2743