Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Hamon, Michèle ^a,b   Fau, Georges ^a   Née, Guillaume ^c   Ehtisham, Javed ^a   Morello, Rémy ^a   Hamon, Martial ^a,d  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d INSTITUT PASTEUR DE LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DIPYRIDAMOLE;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; AGED; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REVIEW;

ADENOSINE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; DIPYRIDAMOLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77955900785     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-29     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease. KR Nandalur BA Dwamena AF Choudhri MR Nandalur RC Carlos, J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 1343 53 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.030 17903634
2. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. P Whiting AWS Rutjes JB Reitsma PMM Bossuyt J Kleijnen, BMC Med Res Methodol 2003 3 25 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 14606960
3. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. AS Glas JG Lijmer MH Prins GJ Bonsel PM Bossuyt, J Clin Epidemio 2003 56 1129 1135 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00177-X
4. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. WL Devillé F Buntinx LM Bouter VM Montori HC de Vet DA van der Windt PD Bezemer, BMC Med Res Methodol 2002 2 9 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 12097142
5. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. LE Moses D Shapiro B Littenberg, Stat Med 1993 12 1293 1316 8210827
6. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. SD Walter, Stat Med 2002 21 1237 1256 10.1002/sim.1099 12111876
7. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. JG Lijmer PM Bossuyt SH Heisterkamp, Stat Med 2002 21 1525 1537 10.1002/sim.1185 12111918
8. Meta-DiSc for Windows: A Software package for the Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests. J Zamora A Muriel V Abraira, XI Cochrane Colloquium. Barcelona 2003 http://www.hrc.es/investigacion/metadisc.html
9. Evidence-based practice in radiology: step 3 and 4-appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analysis. S Halligan DG Altman, Radiology 2007 243 13 27 10.1148/radiol.2431051823 17392245
10. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. N Al-Saadi E Nagel M Gross A Bornstedt B Schnackenburg C Klein W Klimek H Oswald E Fleck, Circulation 2000 101 1379 1383 10736280
11. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. J Schwitter D Nanz S Kneifel K Bertschinger M Büchi PR Knüsel B Marincek TF Lüscher GK von Schulthess, Circulation 2001 103 2230 2235 11342469
12. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. T Ibrahim SG Nekolla K Schreiber K Odaka S Volz J Mehilli M Güthlin W Delius M Schwaiger, J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 39 864 870 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01829-0 11869854
13. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a qualitative approach. PR Sensky NJ Samani C Reek GR Cherryman, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002 18 373 383 10.1023/A:1016057821005 12194678
14. Combined first-pass perfusion and viability study at MR imaging in patients with non-ST segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: feasibility study. CW Chiu NM So WW Lam KY Chan JE Sanderson, Radiology 2003 226 717 722 10.1148/radiol.2263011902 12601212
15. The impact of myocardial flow reserve on the detection of coronary artery disease by perfusion imaging methods: an NHLBI WISE study. M Doyle A Fuisz E Kortright RW Biederman EG Walsh ET Martin L Tauxe WJ Rogers CN Merz C Pepine B Sharaf GM Pohost, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003 5 475 485 10.1081/JCMR-120022263 12882078
16. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. N Ishida H Sakuma M Motoyasu T Okinaka N Isaka T Nakano K Takeda, Radiology 2003 229 209 216 10.1148/radiol.2291021118 12944596
17. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. E Nagel C Klein I Paetsch S Hettwer B Schnackenburg K Wegscheider E Fleck, Circulation 2003 108 432 437 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080915. 35024.A9 12860910
18. Combined coronary and perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. NH Bunce E Reyes J Keegan C Bunce SW Davies CH Lorenz DJ Pennell, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004 6 527 539 10.1081/JCMR-120030580 15137337
19. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. TH Giang D Nanz R Coulden M Friedrich M Graves N Al-Saadi TF Lüscher GK von Schulthess J Schwitter, Eur Heart J 2004 25 1657 1665 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.037 15351166
20. Assessment of coronary artery disease with nicorandil stress magnetic resonance imaging. Y Kawase M Nishimoto K Hato K Okajima J Yoshika, Osaka City Med 2004 50 87 94
21. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. I Paetsch C Jahnke A Wahl R Gebker M Neuss E Fleck E Nagel, Circulation 2004 110 835 842 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138927.00357.FB 15289384
22. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. S Plein JP Greewood JP Ridgway G Cranny SG Ball MU Sivanathan, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44 2173 2181 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08. 056 15582315
23. Whole-heart dipyridamole stress first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI for the detection of coronary artery disease. B Takase M Nagata T Kihara A Kameyawa K Noya T Matsui F Ohsuzu M Ishihara A Kurita, Jpn Heart J 2004 45 475 486 10.1536/jhj.45.475 15240967
24. Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography. H Thiele S Plein M Breeuwer JP Ridgway D Higgins PJ Thorley G Schuler MU Sivananthan, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004 20 371 384 10.1023/B:CAIM.0000041938.45383.a4 15765860
25. Evaluation of ischemic heart disease on a 1.5 Tesla scanner: combined first-pass perfusion and viability study. S Okuda A Tanimoto T Satoh J Hashimoto H Shinmoto N Higuchi A Nozaki S Kuribayashi, Radiat Med 2005 23 230 235 16012398
26. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography. S Plein A Radjenovic JP Ridgway D Barmby JP Greenwood SG Ball MU Sivananthan, Radiology 2005 235 423 430 10.1148/radiol.2352040454 15858084
27. Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. H Sakuma N Suzawa Y Ichikawa K Makino T Hirano K Kitagawa K Takeda, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 185 95 102 15972407
28. Diagnostic performance of stress perfusion and delayed-enhancement MR imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. RC Cury CA Cattani LA Gabure DJ Racy JM de Gois U Siebert SS Lima TJ Brady, Radiology 2006 240 39 45 10.1148/radiol.2401051161 16793971
29. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. I Klem JF Heitner DJ Shah MH Sketch Jr V Behar J Weinsaft P Cawley M Parker M Elliott RM Judd RJ Kim, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 1630 1638 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.074 16631001
30. Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography. G Pilz P Bernhardt M Klos E Ali M Wild B Hofling, Clin Res Cardiol 2006 95 531 538 10.1007/s00392-006- 0422-7 16897145
31. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Rieber A Huber I Erhard S Mueller M Schweyer A Koenig TM Schiele K Theisen U Siebert SO Schoenberg M Reiser V Klauss, Eur Heart J 2006 27 1465 1471 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl039 16720685
32. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla. AS Cheng TJ Pegg TD Karamitsos N Searle M Jerosch-Herold RP Choudhury AP Banning S Neubauer MD Robson JB Selvanayagam, J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 49 2440 2249 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.028 17599608
33. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. MA Costa S Shoemaker H Futamatsu C Klassen DJ Angiolillo M Nguyen A Siuciak P Gilmore MM Zenni L Guzman TA Bass N Wilke, J Am Coll Cardiol 2007 50 514 522 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.053 17678734
34. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. JP Greenwood JF Younger JP Ridgway MU Sivananthan SG Ball S Plein, Heart 2007 93 1363 1368 10.1136/hrt.2006.106427 17309909
35. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. HP Kühl M Katoh C Buhr GA Krombach R Hoffmann T Rassaf M Neizel A Buecker M Kelm, Am J Cardiol 2007 99 1090 1095 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.061 17437733
36. Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady-state, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging. N Merkle J Wöhrle O Grebe T Nusser M Kunze HA Kestler M Kochs V Hombach, Heart 2007 93 1381 1385 10.1136/hrt.2006.104232 17488772
37. MR stress perfusion for the detection of flow-limiting stenoses in symptomatic patients with known coronary artery disease and history of stent implantation. A Seeger C Doesch B Klumpp U Kramer M Fenchel T Hoevelborn M Gawaz CD Claussen AE May S Miller, Rofo 2007 179 1068 1073 17879175
38. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease. R Gebker C Jahnke I Paetsch S Kelle B Schnackenburg E Fleck E Nagel, Radiology 2008 247 57 63 10.1148/radiol.2471070596 18305188
39. High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. C Meyer K Strach D Thomas H Litt CP Nähle K Tiemann U Schwenger HH Schild T Sommer, Eur Radiol 2008 18 226 233 10.1007/s00330-007-0746-3 17851665
40. Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. G Pilz M Klos E Ali B Hoefling R Scheck P Bernhardt, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008 10 8 10.1186/1532-429X-10-8 18275591
41. Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. C Klein R Gebker T Kokocinski S Dreysse B Schnackenburg E Fleck E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008 10 45 10.1186/1532-429X-10-45 18928521
42. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. I Klem S Greulich JF Heitner H Kim H Vogelsberg EM Kispert SR Ambati C Bruch M Parker RM Judd RJ Kim U Sechtem, J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008 1 436 45
43. Combined myocardial stress perfusion imaging and myocardial stress tagging for detection of coronary artery disease at 3 Tesla. D Thomas K Strach C Meyer CP Naehle S Schaare S Wasmann HH Schild T Sommer, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008 10 59 10.1186/1532-429X-10-59 19094196
44. Adenosine stress first pass perfusion for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis: a feasibility study. C Burgstahler M Kunze MP Gawaz V Rasche J Wöhrle V Hombach N Merkle, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008 24 195 200 10.1007/s10554-007-9236-6 17541724
45. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. EVR Di Bella DL Parker AJ Sinusas, Magn Reson Med 2005 54 1295 1299 10.1002/mrm.20666 16200553
46. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. SD Wolff J Schwitter R Coulden MG Friedrich DA Bluemke RW Biederman ET Martin AJ Lansky F Kashanian TK Foo PE Licato CR Comeau, Circulation 2004 110 732 737 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138106.84335.62 15289374
47. MR-Impact: a comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. J Schwitter CM Wacker AC van Rossum M Lombardi N Al-Saadi H Ahlstrom T Dill HB Larsson SD Flamm M Marquardt L Johansson, Eur Heart J 2008 29 480 489 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617 18208849
48. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. WP Ingkanisorn RY Kwong NS Bohme NL Geller KL Rhoads CK Dyke DI Paterson MA Syed AH Aletras AE Arai, J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 1427 1432 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.059 16580532
49. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests. Adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. C Jahnke E Nagel R Gebker T Kokocinski S Kelle R Manka E Fleck I Paetsch, Circulation 2007 115 1769 1776 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652016 17353441
50. Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. G Pilz A Jeske M Klos E Ali B Hoefling R Scheck P Bernhardt, Am J Cardiol 2008 101 1408 1412 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.019 18471450
51. Safety of adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging using a mobile cardiac magnetic resonance system. P Bernhardt M Steffens K Kleinertz R Morell R Budde R Leischik A Krämer U Overhoff O Strohm, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006 8 475 478 10.1080/10976640600575270 16755834