Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease

Radiology

Volumn 247, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-63

  Gebker, Rolf ^a   Jahnke, Cosima ^a   Paetsch, Ingo ^a   Kelle, Sebastian ^a   Schnackenburg, Bernhard ^b   Fleck, Eckart ^a   Nagel, Eike ^a  

^a DEUTSCHES HERZZENTRUM BERLIN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTIFACT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 42449133769     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2471070596     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ. The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1987;59(7):23C-30C.
2. McCrohon JA, Lyne JC, Rahman SL, Lorenz CH, Underwood SR, Pennell DJ. Adjunctive role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of patients with inferior attenuation on myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7(2):377-382.
3. Sakuma H, Suzawa N, Ichikawa Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185(1):95-102.
4. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103(18):2230- 2235.
5. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101(12):1379-1383.
6. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25(18):1657- 1665.
7. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229(1):209-216.
8. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108(4):432-437.
9. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004;110(6):732-737.
10. Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Ward HA. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(4):735-746.
11. Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, Boesiger P. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(4):799-806.
12. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542.
13. Nayak KS, Cunningham CH, Santos JM, Pauly JM. Real-time cardiac MRI at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(4):655-660.
14. Araoz PA, Glockner JF, McGee KP, et al. 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7(3):559-564.
15. Karamitsos TD, Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Robson MD, Neubauer S, Selvanayagam JB. Myocardial stress perfusion imaging at 3T: comparison of semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9(2):369-370.
16. Miszalski-Jamka K, von der Recke G, Hardung D, et al. A prospective study in 645 consecutive patients to assess safety and feasibility of adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8(1):43.
17. Klem I, Heitner JF, Shah DJ, et al. Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(8):1630-1638.
18. Arai AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11(6):383-398.
19. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(5):1295-1299.
20. Al-Saadi N, Torheim G, Reynolds G, De Marchi D, Burchielli S, Lombardi M. Effects of spatial and temporal resolution on the dark rim artifact in first pass myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9(2):173-174.