High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 533-541

  Klumpp, Bernhard D ^a   Seeger, Achim ^a   Doesch, Christina ^a   Doering, Joerg ^a   Hoevelborn, Tobias ^a   Kramer, Ulrich ^a   Fenchel, Michael ^a   Gawaz, Meinrad P ^a   Claussen, Claus D ^a   Miller, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

3T; Contrast media; Coronary artery disease; High field MR imaging; Myocardial perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOBUTROL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYPERLIPOPROTEINEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; EXERCISE TEST; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTIGRAPHY;

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERFUSION IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 77952305982     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1580-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB (1986) Pattern of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year followup of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 111:383-390
2. Link N, Tanner M (2001) Coronary artery disease: Part 1. Epidemiology and diagnosis. West J Med 174:257-261
3. Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ (1987) The ischaemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischaemia. Am J Cardiol 59:23C-30C
4. Bourdarias JP (1995) Coronary reserve: concept and physiological variations. Eur Heart J 16:2-65.
5. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y et al (1997) Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR Imaging. Radiology 204:373-384
6. Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, van Enige MJ et al (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with 201 thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 11:607-615
7. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432-437
8. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR (1990) First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 174:757-762
9. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al (2007) Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 115:1769-1776
10. Fenchel M, Helber U, Simonetti OP et al (2004) Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP- two-dimensional (2D) and SR-Turbo- FLASH-2D pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:555-563
11. Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Jochims M et al (2004) Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:750-757
12. Sasaki M, Shibata E, Kanbara Y et al (2005) Enhancement effects and relaxivities of gadolinium-DTPA at 1.5 T versus 3 Tesla: a phantom study. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:145-149
13. Sharma P, Socolow J, Patel S et al (2006) Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5 T and 3 T in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:323-330
14. Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE et al (2004) Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 51:799-806 15.
15. Larsson EM, Stahlberg F (2005) 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Better morphological and functional images with higher magnetic field strength. Lakartidningen 102:460-463
16. Araoz PA, Glockner JF, McGee KP et al (2005) 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:559-564\
17. Barmeyer AA, Stork A, Muellerleile K et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging in the detection of reduced coronary flow velocity reserve. Radiology 243:277-385
18. Tombach B, Heindel W(2002) Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550-1556
19. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. Astatement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539-542
20. Paetsch I, Gebker R, Fleck E et al (2003) Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging: a noninvasive tool for functional and morphological assessment of coronary artery disease: current clinical applications and potential future concepts. J Interven Cardiol 16:457-463
21. Hunold P, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J (2006) Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective. Eur Radiol 16:1779-1788
22. Tanenbaum LN (2006) Clinical 3 T MR imaging: mastering the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:1-15
23. Fukatsu H (2003) 3 T MR for clinical use: update. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:37-45
24. Tyler DJ, Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE et al (2006) Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3 T: FLASH vs SSFP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 8:709-715
25. Nayak KS, Cunningham CH, Santos JM et al (2004) Real-time cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 51:655-660
26. Theisen D, Wintersperger BJ, Huber A et al (2007) Myocardial perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 T and 1.5 Tesla with an identical sequence design. Ivest Radiol 42:499-506
27. Klumpp BD, Sandstede J, Lodemann KP et al (2009) Intraindividual comparison of myocardial delayed enhancement MR imaging using gadobenate dimeglumine at 1.5 T and 3 T. Eur Radiol 19:1124-1131
28. Klumpp B, Hoevelborn T, Fenchel M et al (2009) Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging-first experience at 3.0 T. Eur J Radiol 69:165-172
29. Klumpp B, Fenchel M, Hoevelborn T et al (2006) Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol 41:661-667
30. Hunold P, Maderwald S, Eggebrecht H et al (2004) Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with Turbo FLASH imaging. Eur Radiol 14:409-416
31. Wieben O, Francois C, Scott BR (2008) Cardiac MRI of ischaemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Eur J Radiol 65:15-28
32. Greenman RL, Shirosky JE, Mulkern RVet al (2003) Double inversion blackblood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:648-655
33. Doesch C, Seeger A, Hoevelborn T et al (2008) Adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of ischaemic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol 97:905-912
34. Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A et al (1999) Magnetic resonance firstpass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:676-685
35. Gebker R, Jahnke C, Paetsch I et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology 247:57-63
36. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ (2005) On the dark rim artefact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 54:1295-1299
37. Al-Saadi N, Torheim G, Reynolds G et al (2007) Effects of spatial and temporal resolution on the dark rim artifact in first pass myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 9:173-174
38. Plein S, Schwitter J, Suerder D et al (2008) k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiology 249:493-500