Phylogenetic analysis of Primula section Primula reveals rampant non-monophyly among morphologically distinct species

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-34

  Schmidt Lebuhn, Alexander N ^a   de Vos, Jurriaan M ^a   Keller, Barbara ^a   Conti, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ancestral polymorphism; Bayesian phylogenetics; Hybridization; Incomplete lineage sorting; Phylogeny; Primula

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRIMULACEAE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PRIMULA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

PRIMULA; PRIMULA ELATIOR; PRIMULA JULIAE; PRIMULA MEGASEIFOLIA; PRIMULA VERIS; PRIMULA VULGARIS; PRIMULACEAE;

EID: 84864559505     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Avise J.C., Ball R.M. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1990, 7:45-67.
2. Barrett S.C.H. Evolution of sex: the evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:274-284.
3. Barrett S.C.H., Shore J.S. New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants 2008, 3-32. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. V.E. Franklin-Tong (Ed.).
4. Brown J.M., Lemmon A.R. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:643-655.
5. Brown J.M., Hedtke S.M., Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:145-161.
6. Bruen T.C. PhiPack: PHI Test and other Tests of Recombination 2005, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
7. Bruen T.C., Philippe H., Bryant D. A simple robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 2006, 172:2665-2681.
8. Carstens B.C., Dewey T.A. Species delimitation using a combined coalescent and information-theoretic approach: an example from North American Myotis bats. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:1-15.
9. Chen W., Bi K., Fu J. Frequent mitochondrial gene introgression among high elevation Tibetan megophryid frogs revealed by conflicting gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2856-2876.
10. Cranston K.A., Hurwitz B., Ware D., Stein L., Wing R.A. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:489-500.
11. Crisp M.D., Chandler G.T. Paraphyletic species. Telopea 1996, 6:813-844.
12. Cummings M.P., Neel M.C., Shaw K. A genealogical approach to quantifying lineage divergence. Evolution 2008, 62:2411-2422.
13. Darwin C. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species 1877, John Murray, London, UK.
14. de Queiroz K. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays 1999, 49-89. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. R.A. Wilson (Ed.).
15. de Vries, E., 1919. Versuche über die Frucht und Samenbildung bei Artkreuzungen in der Gattung Primula. PhD Thesis, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
16. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
17. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl. Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
18. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5936-5941.
19. Ereshefsky M. Foundational issues concerning taxa and taxon names. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:295-301.
20. Funk D.J., Omland K.E. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:397-423.
21. Guggisberg A., Mansion G., Conti E. Disentangling reticulate evolution in an arctic-alpine polyploid complex. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:55-73.
22. Guggisberg A., Mansion G., Kelso S., Conti E. Evolution of biogeographic patterns, ploidy levels, and breeding systems in a diploid-polyploid species complex of Primula. New Phytol. 2006, 171:617-632.
23. Gurney M., Preston C.D., Barrett J., Briggs D. Hybridization between Oxlip Primula elatior (L.) Hill and primrose P. vulgaris Hudson, and the identification of their variable hybrid P. × digenea A. Kerner. Watsonia 2007, 26:239-251.
24. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
25. Hamby R.K., Zimmer E.A. Ribosomal RNA as a phylogenetic tool in plant systematics. Molecular Systematics of Plants 1992, 50-91. Chapman & Hall, New York. P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (Eds.).
26. Hamilton M.B. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Mol. Ecol. 1999, 8:521-523.
27. Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S., Inceer H. Chromosome counts of some Primula species (Primulaceae). Biologia (Bratislava) 2003, 58:45-48.
28. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:570-580.
29. Heslop Harrison J.W. The Northumberland and Durham Primulas of the section Vernales. Trans. North. Nat. Union 1931, 1:48-77.
30. Hudson R.R., Coyne J.A. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 2002, 56:1557-1565.
31. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F.R. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
32. Hughes C.E., Eastwood R.J., Bailey C.D. From famine to feast? Selecting nuclear DNA sequence loci for plant species-level phylogeny reconstruction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2006, 361:211-225.
33. Joly S., McLenachan P.A., Lockhart P.J. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:E54-E70.
34. Kálmán K., Medvegy A., Mihalik E. Pattern of the floral variation in the hybrid zone of two distylous Primula species. Flora 2004, 199:218-227.
35. Kelso S., Beardsley P.M., Weitemier K. Phylogeny and biogeography of Primula sect. Parryi (Primulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 2009, 170:93-106.
36. Komarov, V.L., 1963. Flora of the USSR. Botanicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskow, Russia [English translation by Landau, N., Israel Program for Scientific Translations].
37. Kovtonyuk N.K., Goncharov A.A. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Primula L. (Primulaceae) inferred from the ITS region sequences of nuclear rDNA. Russ. J. Genetics 2009, 45:663-670.
38. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:971-973.
39. Länger R., Saukel J. Systematics of Primula veris (Primulaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 1993, 188:31-55.
40. Lemmon A.R., Moriarty E.C. The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:265-277.
41. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
42. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
43. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2009. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.72. http://mesquiteproject.org.
44. Marshall D.C. Cryptic failure of partitioned Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: lost in the land of long trees. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:108-117.
45. Marshall D.C., Simon C., Buckley T.R. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:993-1003.
46. Martins L., Oberprieler C., Hellwig F.H. A phylogenetic analysis of Primulaceae s.l. based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 2003, 237:75-85.
47. Mast A.R., Kelso S., Conti E. Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic?. New Phytol. 2006, 171:605-616.
48. Mast A.R., Feller D.M.S., Kelso S., Conti E. Buzz-pollinated Dodecatheon originated from within the heterostylous Primula subgenus Auriculastrum (Primulaceae): a seven-region cpDNA phylogeny and its implications for floral evolution. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91:926-942.
49. Mast A.R., Kelso S., Richards A.J., Lang D.J., Feller D.M.S., Conti E. Phylogenetic relationships in Primula L. and related genera (Primulaceae) based on noncoding chloroplast DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2001, 162:1381-1400.
50. McKay B.D., Zink R.M. The causes of mitochondrial DNA gene tree paraphyly in birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54:647-650.
51. Mims M.C., Hulsey C.D., Fitzpatrick B.M., Streelman J.T. Geography disentangles introgression from ancestral polymorphism in Lake Malawi cichlids. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:940-951.
52. Mishler B.D. Getting rid of species?. Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays 1999, 307-315. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. R.A. Wilson (Ed.).
53. Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden.
54. Pelser P.B., Kennedy A.H., Tepe E.J., Shidler J.B., Nordenstam B., Kadereit J.W., Watson L.E. Patterns and causes of incongruence between plastid and nuclear Senecioneae (Asteraceae) phylogenies. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97:856-873.
55. Posada D., Buckley T.T. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:793-808.
56. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer - MCMC Trace Analysis Tool Version 1.5.0. Program Distributed by the Authors. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/.
57. Rannala B., Zhu T., Yang Z. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:325-335.
58. Richards A.J. Primula 2003, Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
59. Rieppel O. Species monophyly. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2010, 48:1-8.
60. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
61. Sakalidis M.L., Hardy G.E.St.J., Burgess T.I. Use of the genealogical sorting index (GSI) to delineate species boundaries in the Neofusicoccum parvum-Neofuscicoccum ribis species complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 60:333-344.
62. Schmidt-Lebuhn A.N. Monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of Minthostachys (Labiatae, Nepetoideae) examined using morphological and nrITS data. Plant Syst. Evol. 2008, 270:25-38.
63. Shaw J., Lickey E.B., Schilling E.E., Small R.L. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:275-288.
64. Smith W.W., Fletcher H.R. The genus Primula: section Vernales. Trans. Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 1948, 34:402-468.
65. Smith G.F., Burrow B., Lowe D.B. Primulas of Europe and America 1984, Alpine Garden Society, Pershore, UK.
66. *and other Methods) Version 4.0b10 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
67. Syring J., Farrell K., Businsky R., Cronn R., Liston A. Widespread genealogical nonmonophyly in species of Pinus subgenus Strobus. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:1-19.
68. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 1983, 105:437-460.
69. Trift I., Kallersjo M., Anderberg A.A. The monophyly of Primula (Primulaceae) evaluated by analysis of sequences from the chloroplast gene rbcL. Syst. Bot. 2002, 27:396-407.
70. Trift I., Lidén M., Anderberg A.A. Phylogeny and biogeography of Dionysia (Primulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 165:845-860.
71. Valentine D.H. Studies in British primulas. I. Hybridization between primrose and oxlip (Primula vulgaris Huds. and P. elatior Schreb.). New Phytol. 1947, 46:229-253.
72. Valentine D.H. Studies in British primulas. III. Hybridization between P. elatior (L.) Hill and P. veris L. New Phytol. 1952, 50:383-399.
73. Valentine D.H. Studies in British primulas IV. Hybridization between Primula vulgaris Huds and P. veris L. New Phytol. 1955, 54:70-80.
74. van der Niet T., Linder H.P. Dealing with incongruence in the quest for the species tree: a case study from the orchid genus Satyrium. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47:154-174.
75. Wendel J.F., Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing 1998, 265-296. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (Eds.).
76. Weisrock D.W., Rasoloarison R.M., Fiorentino I., Ralison J.M., Goodman S.M., Kappeler P.M., Yoder Y.D. Delimiting species without nuclear monophyly in Madagascar's mouse lemurs. PLoS One 2010, 5:1-13.
77. Woodell S.R.J. Natural hybridization between the cowslip (Primula veris L.) and the primrose (P. vulgaris Huds.) in Britain. Watsonia 1965, 6:190-202.
78. Yang Z., Rannala B. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:455-470.
79. Yang Z., Rannala B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:9264-9269.
80. Zhang L.-B., Comes H.P., Kadereit J.W. The temporal course of quaternary diversification in the European high mountain endemic Primula sect. Auricula (Primulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 165:191-207.