Toward a theory of personalized learning communities

Designs for Learning Environments of the Future: International Perspectives from the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 263-281

  Hamilton, Eric ^a   Jago, Martine ^a  

^a PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agents; Design principles; Interactional bandwith; Modeling; Personalized learning communities; Self regulation; Systems thinking; Technology affordances

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864555888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Adelson, B. (2003). Issues in scientific creativity: insight, perseverance and personal technique -Profiles of the 2002 Franklin Institute Laureates. Journal of The Franklin Institute, 340(3), 163-189.
2. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students'conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87-111. (Pubitemid 39051326)
3. Barrett, L. F. & Barrett, D. J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2), 175-185.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, S. (eds). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching & learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education & Technology, 13(1), 23-41.
7. Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2005, July 18-22, 2005). A framework for designing and analysing open learner modelling. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Norris, C. J., Decety, J., Monteleone, G., & Nusbaum, H. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 83-92.
9. Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal for Engineering Education, 97(3), 339-353.
10. Chuansheng, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitaieva, J., Qi, D., & Gui, X. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to be creative across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89-110. (Pubitemid 41175457)
11. Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
12. Clement, J. J. & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2007). Model based learning and instruction in science. Science and Education, 16(7-8), 647-652.
13. Corno, L. Y. N. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161-173.
14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
15. Diefes-Dex. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717865 to Purdue University.
16. English, L. D., Fox, J. L., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 156-163.
17. Frank, M. J., Doll, B. B., Oas-Terpstra, J., & Moreno, F. (2009). Prefrontal and striatal dopamin- ergic genes predict individual differences in exploration and exploitation. Nature Neuroscience, 12(8), 1062-1068.
18. Hamilton, E. (2005). Affective composites: Autonomy and proxy in pedagogical agent networks. In J. Tao, J. Tan & R. E. Picard (Eds.), Affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII2005) (Vol. 3784, pp. 898-906). Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Pubitemid 43763417)
19. Hamilton, E. (2007a). Emerging metaphors and constructs from pedagogical agent networks. Educational Technology (Special Issue, A. Baylor editor), 47(1).
20. Hamilton, E. (2007b). What changes are occurring in the kind of problem-solving situations where mathematical thinking is needed beyond school? In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Hamilton, E., & Harding, N. (2008). IES grant: Agent and Library Augmented Shared Knowledge Areas (ALASKA). Institute for Education Sciences Award 305A080667.
22. Hamilton, E., & Hurford, A. (2007). Combining Collaborative Workspaces with Tablet Computing: Research in Learner Engagement and Conditions of Flow. Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, pages C3-C8.
23. Hamilton, E., Lesh, R., & Lester, F. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2), 1-25.
24. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2000, April). Practice makes a difference: Design principles for adaptive expertise. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LO.
25. Hjalmarson, M. A., Cardella, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Uncertainty and iteration in design tasks for engineering students. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
27. Hsiang, C. (2006). Digitization of the experience sampling method: transformation, implementation, and assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(1), 106-118.
28. Kay, J. A. (2000). Accretion representation for scrutable student modelling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada.
29. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design(TM) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. (Pubitemid 37244610)
30. Latz, A. O., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2009). Peer coaching to improve classroom differentiation: Perspectives from project CLUE. Roeper Review, 31(1), 27-39.
31. Lesh, R. (2006). Modeling students modeling abilities: The teaching and learning of complex systems in education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 45-52. (Pubitemid 43242263)
32. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Cartographer). (2003). Beyond constructivism: A models & modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problems solving. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Lesh, R., Hamilton, E., & Kaput, J. (2007). Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Lesh, R., Middleton, J. A., Caylor, E., & Gupta, S. (2008). A science need: Designing tasks to engage students in modeling complex data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 113-130.
36. Lesh, R. & Yoon, C. (2004). Evolving communities of mind-In which development involves several interacting and simultaneous developing strands. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 6(2), 205-226. (Pubitemid 38629588)
37. Lesh, R., Yoon, C., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). John Dewey revisited-Making mathematics practical versus making practice mathematical. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Mehlhorn, J. (2006). Fostering group creativity. Scientific American Mind, 17(4), 78-79.
39. Miller, R., & Olds, M. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717862 to the Colorado School of Mines.
40. Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89-105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
42. National Science Foundation. (2008). CreativelT funding program - NSF 08572. Retrieved July 1, 2009 from http://nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08572/nsf08572. htm.
43. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., & Knudsen, J. (2008). The role of scaling up research in designing for and evaluating robustness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 149-170.
44. Roth, W.-M. (2007). Mathematical modeling 'in the Wild': A case of hot cognition. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2007). Collaborative research: Impact of model-eliciting activities on engineering teaching and learning: National Science Foundation Grant DUE-0717861 to the University of Pittsburgh.
46. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
47. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
48. Swee Fong, N. & Lee, K. (2009). The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 282-313.
49. Tarquin, K. & Cook-Cottone, C. (2008). Relationships among aspects of student alienation and self concept. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 16-25.
50. Thomas, D. & Brown, J. S. (2009). Why virtual worlds can matter. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 37-49.
51. Wagner, C. (2008). Learning experience with virtual worlds. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(3), 263-266.
52. Weigel, M., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1-18.