List strength effect without list length effect in recognition memory

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 218-226

  Buratto, Luciano G ^a   Lamberts, Koen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 37849028952     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701566713     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
2. Boldini, A., Russo, R., & Avons, S. E. (2004). One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 353-361.
3. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 231-248.
4. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 37-60.
5. Criss, A. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2006). Differentiating the differentiation models: A comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM). Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 447-460.
6. Curran, T., DeBuse, C., Woroch, B., & Hirshman, E. (2006). Combined pharmacological and electrophysiological dissociation of familiarity and recollection. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1979-2009.
7. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-477.
8. Diana, R. A., & Reder, L. M. (2005). The list strength effect: A contextual competition account. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1289-1302.
9. Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 1-21.
10. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
11. Harvey, L. O., Jr. (2001). Parameter estimation of signal detection models: RscorePlus user's manual. Boulder, CO: Author.
12. Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 302-313.
13. Norman, K. A. (2002). Differential effects of list strength on recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1083-1094.
14. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning- systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611-646.
15. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect. 1: Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
16. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 67-88.
17. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., & Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 267-287.
18. z, and A′. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 643-654.
19. Verde, M. F., & Rotello, C. M. (2004). Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1062-1066.
20. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517