Recognition memory for pseudowords

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-267

  Greene, Robert L ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Familiarity; Frequency; Mirror effect; Pseudowords; Recognition; Similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842606529     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bain, J. D., & Humphreys, M. S. (1988). Relational context: Independent cues, meanings, and configurations. In G. Davis & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 97-137). London: Wiley.
2. Cameron, T. E., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection. Memory & Cognition, 28, 176-183.
3. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
4. Dewhurst, S. A., & Anderson, S. J. (1999). Effects of exact and category repetition in true and false recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 664-673.
5. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30.
6. Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
8. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
9. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
10. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & Adams, J. K. (1998). Response distribution as an explanation of the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 633-644.
11. Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 687-695.
12. Groninger, L. D. (1976). Predicting recognition during storage: The capacity of the memory system to evaluate itself. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 425-428.
13. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1105-1120.
14. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
15. Hintzman, D. L. (2001). Similarity, global matching, and judgments of frequency. Memory & Cognition, 29, 547-556.
16. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228-247.
17. Hintzman, D. L., & Hartry, A. L. (1990). Commensurability in memory for frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 501-523.
18. Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J., & Passannante, A. (2002). Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 499-516.
19. Hirshman, E., & Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection. Psychological Science, 9, 61-65.
20. Hockley, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713-722.
21. Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1176-1184.
22. Joordens, S., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
23. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
24. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197-211.
25. Lockhart, R. S. (2000). Methods of memory research. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 45-57). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Directed forgetting. In J. M. Golding & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 1-57). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Macmillan, N. A. (1993). Signal detection theory as data analysis method and psychological decision model. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 21-57). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1999). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A Bayesian approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
29. Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., & Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1095-1110.
30. Murdock, B. B. (1982a). Recognition memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 1-26). New York: Academic Press.
31. Murdock, B. B. (1982b). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 104, 839-862.
32. Rajaram, S., Hamilton, M., & Bolton, A. (2002). Distinguishing states of awareness from confidence during retrieval: Evidence from amnesia. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 227-235.
33. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2000). Memory models. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 571-581). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320.
35. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM: Remembering effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-160.
36. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
37. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12.
38. Westerman, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory. Memory & Cognition, 28, 167-175.
39. Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence for an attributional basis of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-732.
40. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547-565.
41. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis for feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
42. Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 681-690.
43. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.