Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena consensus panel

European Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 368-381

  Montorsi, Francesco ^a   Wilson, Timothy G ^b   Rosen, Raymond C ^c   Ahlering, Thomas E ^d   Artibani, Walter ^e   Carroll, Peter R ^f   Costello, Anthony ^g   Eastham, James A ^h   Ficarra, Vincenzo ⁱ   Guazzoni, Giorgio ^j   Menon, Mani ^k   Novara, Giacomo ⁱ   Patel, Vipul R ^l   Stolzenburg, Jens Uwe ^m   Van Der Poel, Henk ⁿ   Van Poppel, Hein ^o   Mottrie, Alexandre ^p  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^h MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^j SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^k HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^l FLORIDA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

ⁿ NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^o UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^p OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

more..

Author keywords

Consensus; Evidence based review; Prostate; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasm; Radical prostatectomy; RALP; RARP; Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTINENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PENIS ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SURGEON; UNITED STATES; URINE INCONTINENCE;

BENCHMARKING; CONSENSUS; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864480503     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. J.W. Park, H.W. Lee, and W. Kim Comparative assessment of a single surgeon's series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted J Endourol 25 2011 597 602
2. J. Binder, and W. Kramer Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy BJU Int 87 2001 408 410
3. C.C. Abbou, A. Hoznek, and L. Salomon Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case [in French] Prog Urol 10 2000 520 523
4. G. Pasticier, J.B.W. Rietbergen, B. Guillonneau, G. Fromont, M. Menon, and G. Vallancien Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men Eur Urol 40 2001 70 74
5. M. Menon, A. Shrivastava, and A. Tewari Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes J Urol 168 2002 945 949
6. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibani Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037 1063
7. G. Novara, V. Ficarra, and R. Rosen Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 431 452
8. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and R. Rosen Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 405 417
9. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and T. Ahlering Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 418 430
10. G. Novara, V. Ficarra, and S. Mocellin Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 382 404
11. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 151 2009 264 269
12. R. Boulkedid, H. Abdoul, M. Loustau, O. Sibony, and C. Alberti Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review PLoS One 6 2011 e20476
13. A. Horwich, C. Parker, and C. Bangma Prostate cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 21 Suppl 5 2010 v129 v133
14. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol 59 2011 61 71
15. NCCN guidelines in oncology. Prostate cancer (v1.2011). National Comprehensive Cancer Network Web site. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician-gls/f-guidelines.asp.
16. J.C. Hu, K.F. Gold, C.L. Pashos, S.S. Mehta, and M.S. Litwin Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes J Clin Oncol 21 2003 401 405
17. J. Walz, A.L. Burnett, and A.J. Costello A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 57 2010 179 192
18. A. Tewari, J.O. Peabody, and M. Fischer An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 43 2003 444 454
19. A.T. Savera, S. Kaul, K. Badani, A.T. Stark, N.L. Shah, and M. Menon Robotic radical prostatectomy with the "veil of Aphrodite" technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing Eur Urol 49 2006 1065 1074
20. American Urological Association. Prostate cancer. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. American Urological Association Web site. http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and- quality-care/clinical-guidelines/main-reports/proscan07/content.pdf.
21. A. Mattei, F.G. Fuechsel, and N. Bhatta Dhar The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study Eur Urol 53 2008 118 125
22. A. Briganti, F.K. Chun, P.I. Karakiewicz, P. Rigatti, and F. Montorsi Is node-positive prostate cancer always a systemic disease? Eur Urol 54 2008 243 246
23. A. Heidenreich, Z. Varga, and R. Von Knoblock Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis J Urol 167 2002 1681 1686
24. N.N. Stone, R.G. Stock, and P. Unger Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques J Urol 158 1997 1891 1894
25. M.E. Allaf, G.S. Palapattu, B.J. Trock, H.B. Carter, and P.C. Walsh Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 172 2004 1840 1844
26. P. Bader, F.C. Burkhard, R. Markwalder, and U.E. Studer Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 169 2009 849 854
27. A. Briganti, R.J. Karnes, and L.F. Da Pozzo Combination of adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapy significantly prolongs survival of patients with pT2-4 pN+ prostate cancer: results of a matched analysis Eur Urol 59 2011 832 840
28. A. Briganti, J.R. Karnes, and L.F. Da Pozzo Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy Eur Urol 55 2009 261 270
29. A.V. D'Amico, R. Whittington, and S.B. Malkowicz Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA 280 1998 969 974
30. G.L. Martin, R.N. Nunez, and M.D. Humphreys Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on perioperative outcomes BJU Int 104 2009 1734 1737
31. J. Mantz, C.M. Samama, and F. Tubach Impact of preoperative maintenance or interruption of aspirin on thrombotic and bleeding events after elective non-cardiac surgery: the multicentre, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, STRATAGEM trial Br J Anaesth 107 2011 899 910
32. F.P. Secin, T. Jiborn, and A.S. Bjartell Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 53 2008 134 145
33. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Venous thromboembolism: reducing the risk. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to hospital. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Web site. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/12695/47195/47195.pdf. Updated March 30, 2010.
34. Grabe M, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, Botto H, et al. Guidelines on urological infections. European Association of Urology Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/ pdf/Urological%20Infections%202010.pdf.
35. E.Y. Park, B.N. Koo, K.T. Min, and S.H. Nam The effect of pneumoperitoneum in the steep Trendelenburg position on cerebral oxygenation Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53 2009 895 899
36. A.F. Kalmar, L. Foubert, and J.F.A. Hendrickx Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy Br J Anaesth 104 2010 433 439
37. H. Awad, S. Santilli, and M. Ohr The effects of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy Anesth Analg 109 2009 473 478
38. S. Beck, D. Skarecky, K. Osann, R. Juarez, and T.E. Ahlering Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on incisional hernias and cosmesis Urology 78 2011 586 590
39. N. Buffi, A. Cestari, and G. Lughezzani Robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy for iatrogenic lumbar and iliac ureteral stricture: technical details and preliminary clinical results Eur Urol 60 2011 1221 1225
40. B. Guillonneau, and G. Vallancien Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique J Urol 163 2000 1643 1649
41. F.P. Secin, F.J. Bianco, and A. Cronin Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely at radical prostatectomy? Decision curve analysis of European Society of Urologic Oncology criteria J Urol 181 2009 609 613
42. A. Tewari, A. Takenaka, and E. Mtui The proximal neurovascular plate and the trizonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve sparing prostatectomy BJU Int 98 2006 314 323
43. A.K. Tewari, R. Yadav, and A. Takenaka Anatomic foundations for nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy. Correlations between anatomic, surgical and 'real time tissue recognition' with multiphoton microscopy J Urol 179 2008 462 467
44. A.K. Tewari, A. Srivastava, and M.W. Huang Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) BJU Int 108 2011 984 992
45. A.K. Tewari, A. Srivastava, and K. Mudaliar Anatomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivity during robotic radical prostatectomy BJU Int 106 2010 1364 1373
46. F. Rocco, L. Carmignani, and P. Acquati Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 175 2006 2201 2206
47. B. Rocco, A. Gregori, and S. Stener Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 51 2007 996 1003
48. F. Rocco, L. Carmignani, and P. Acquati Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter Eur Urol 52 2007 376 383
49. G. Gautam, B. Rocco, V.R. Patel, and K.C. Zorn Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: critical analysis of techniques and outcomes Urology 76 2010 734 741
50. V.R. Patel, R.F. Coelho, K.J. Palmer, and B. Rocco Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes Eur Urol 56 2009 472 478
51. A. Tewari, J. Jhaveri, and S. Rao Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction BJU Int 101 2008 871 877
52. G. Tan, A. Srivastava, and S. Grover Optimizing vesicourethral anastomosis healing after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from three techniques in 1900 patients J Endourol 24 2010 1975 1983
53. R.F. Van Velthoven, T.E. Ahlering, A. Peltier, D.W. Skarecky, and R.V. Clayman Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method Urology 61 2003 699 702
54. J. Sammon, T.K. Kim, and Q.D. Trinh Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture Urology 78 2011 572 579
55. L.S. Krane, M. Bhandari, J.O. Peabody, and M. Menon Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 56 2009 325 331
56. D.S. Finley, E. Rodriguez Jr., and T.E. Ahlering Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience J Urol 178 2007 1296 1299
57. M. Menon, M. Bhandari, and N. Gupta Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up Eur Urol 58 2010 838 846
58. N. Suardi, V. Ficarra, and P. Willemsen Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years Urology 79 2012 133 138
59. F.H. Schroder Prostate cancer around the world. An overview Urol Oncol 28 2010 663 667
60. M.R. Cooperberg, J. Cowan, and J.M. Broering High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007 World J Urol 26 2008 211 218
61. M.R. Cooperberg, A.J. Vickers, and J.M. Broering Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer Cancer 116 2010 5226 5234
62. G. Ploussard, A. Masson-Lecomte, and J.B. Beauval Radical prostatectomy for high-risk defined by preoperative criteria: oncologic follow-up in national multicenter study in 813 patients and assessment of easy-to-use prognostic substratification Urology 78 2011 607 613
63. N. Lawrentschuk, G. Trottier, and C. Kuk Role of surgery in high-risk localized prostate cancer Curr Oncol 17 Suppl 2 2010 S25 S32
64. J.L. Silberstein, A.J. Vickers, and N.E. Power Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures J Endourol 26 2012 748 753
65. J.C. Hu, X. Gu, and S.R. Lipsitz Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy JAMA 302 2009 1557 1564
66. E.A. Klein, F.J. Bianco, and A.M. Serio Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories J Urol 179 2008 2212 2216
67. J.L. Wright, B.L. Dalkin, and L.D. True Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality J Urol 183 2010 2213 2218
68. O. Yossepowitch, A. Bjartell, and J.A. Eastham Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences Eur Urol 55 2009 87 99
69. V.R. Patel, R.F. Coelho, and B. Rocco Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study J Urol 186 2011 511 516
70. J.C. Hu, Q. Wang, C.L. Pashos, S.R. Lipsitz, and N.L. Keating Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 26 2008 2278 2284
71. S.B. Williams, X. Gu, S.R. Lipsitz, P.L. Nguyen, T.K. Choueiri, and J.C. Hu Utilization and expense of adjuvant cancer therapies following radical prostatectomy Cancer 117 2011 4846 4854
72. J.C. Hu, A.V. D'Amico, and N.L. Keating Minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy - reply JAMA 303 2010 619 620
73. D. Mitropoulos, W. Artibani, M. Graefen, M. Remzi, M. Rouprêt, and M. Truss Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel assessment and recommendations Eur Urol 61 2012 341 349
74. F.J. Bianco Jr., P.T. Scardino, and J.A. Eastham Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta") Urology 66 Suppl 2005 83 94
75. V. Ficarra, P. Sooriakumaran, and G. Novara Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification Eur Urol 61 2012 541 548
76. H.J. Lavery, R. Thaly, and D. Albala Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study J Endourol 22 2008 2165 2168
77. V.R. Patel, R. Thaly, and K. Shah Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases BJU Int 99 2007 1109 1112
78. L.S.J.R. Borden, P.M. Koxlowski, C.R. Porter, and J.M. Corman Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system Can J Urol 14 2007 3499 3501
79. S. Andonian, Z. Okeke, and D.A. Okeke Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database Can J Urol 15 2008 3912 3916
80. F.R. Schroeck, T.L. Krupski, and L. Sun Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 54 2008 785 793
81. P.C. Walsh, A.W. Partin, and J.L. Epstein Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years J Urol 152 1994 1831 1836
82. J.A. Eastham, M.W. Kattan, and E. Rogers Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy J Urol 156 1996 1707 1713
83. M.A. Liss, K. Osann, and N. Canvasser Continence definition after radical prostatectomy using urinary quality of life: evaluation of patient reported validated questionnaires J Urol 183 2010 1464 1468
84. S.R. Lee, H.W. Kim, and J.W. Lee Discrepancies in perception of urinary incontinence between patient and physician after robotic radical prostatectomy Yonsei Med J 51 2010 883 887
85. W.R. Parker, R. Wang, C. He, and D.P. Wood Jr. Five year expanded prostate cancer index composite-based quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer BJU Int 107 2010 585 590
86. D. Wittmann, C. He, and M. Coelho Patient preoperative expectations of urinary, bowel, hormonal and sexual functioning do not match actual outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy J Urol 186 2011 494 499
87. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and S. Fracalanza A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution BJU Int 104 2009 534 539
88. A. Tewari, A. Srivasatava, and M. Menon A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution BJU Int 92 2003 205 210
89. T.E. Ahlering, D. Woo, L. Eichel, D.I. Lee, R. Edwards, and D.W. Skarecky Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes Urology 63 2004 819 822
90. A.E. Krambeck, D.S. DiMarco, and L.J. Rangel Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques BJU Int 103 2009 448 453
91. A. Mattei, S. Z'brun, and P. Stucki When and how should we test the tightness of the vesicourethral anastomosis after retropubic radical prostatectomy? Urol Int 86 2011 388 392
92. A. Srivastava, S. Grover, P. Sooriakumaran, J. Joneja, and A.K. Tewari Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a critical analysis of its impact on urinary continence Curr Opin Urol 21 2011 185 194
93. T.A. Shamliyan, J.F. Wyman, R. Ping, T.J. Wilt, and R.L. Kane Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions Rev Urol 11 2009 145 165
94. J.P. Mulhall, A.J. Bella, A. Briganti, A. McCullough, and G. Brock Erectile function rehabilitation in the radical prostatectomy patient F. Montorsi, R. Basson, G. Adaikan, Sexual medicine. Sexual dysfunction in men and women 2010 Health Publication Ltd. Bristol, UK 1005 1046
95. V. Ficarra, S. Cavalleri, G. Novara, M. Aragona, and W. Artibani Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review Eur Urol 51 2007 45 56
96. D.G. Murphy, A. Bjartell, and V. Ficarra Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications Eur Urol 57 2010 735 746
97. P.J. Mendoza, J.M. Stern, and A.Y. Li Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy J Endourol 25 2011 51 55
98. R. Park, S. Martin, J.D. Goldberg, and H. Lepor Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence Urology 57 2001 742 746
99. T.J. Wilt, T.A. Shamliyan, B.C. Taylor, R. MacDonald, and R.L. Kane Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review J Urol 180 2008 820 828
100. W.W. Choi, M.P. Freire, and J.R. Soukup Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy World J Urol 29 2011 21 27
101. D.S. Finley, K. Osann, D. Skarecky, and T.E. Ahlering Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence Urology 73 2009 691 696
102. B.R. Konety, N. Sadetsky, P.R. Carroll CaPSURE Investigators Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume - analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database J Urol 177 2007 1423 1425