Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study

Journal of Urology

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 511-517

  Patel, Vipul R ^a   Coelho, Rafael F ^a,b   Rocco, Bernardo ^a,c   Orvieto, Marcelo ^a   Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ^a   Palmer, Kenneth J ^a   Kameh, Darien ^a   Santoro, Luigi ^a   Coughlin, Geoff D ^a   Liss, Michael ^d   Jeong, Wooju ^e   Malcolm, John ^g   Stern, Joshua M ^h   Sharma, Saurabh ^h   Zorn, Kevin C ⁱ   Shikanov, Sergey ⁱ   Shalhav, Arieh L ⁱ   Zagaja, Gregory P ⁱ   Ahlering, Thomas E ^d   Rha, Koon H ^e   Albala, David M ^f   Fabrizio, Michael D ^g   Lee, David I ^h   Chauhan, Sanket ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL ISRAELITA ALBERT EINSTEIN   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

local; neoplasm recurrence; prostate; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; robotics

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN WEIGHT; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE WEIGHT; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; TUMOR BIOPSY;

EID: 79960171435     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. Pfitzenmaier, S. Pahernik, and T. Tremmel Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 102 2008 1413
2. Y.M. Hong, J.C. Hu, and A.T. Paciorek Impact of radical prostatectomy positive surgical margins on fear of cancer recurrence: results from CaPSURE™ Urol Oncol 28 2010 268
3. L. Cheng, J. Slezak, and E.J. Bergstralh Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 18 2000 2862
4. J.F. Ward, H. Zincke, and E.J. Bergstralh The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy J Urol 172 2004 1328
5. M. Sofer, K.L. Hamilton-Nelson, and J.J. Schlesselmann Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 20 2002 1853
6. D.A. Ackerman, J.M. Barry, and R.A. Wicklund Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy J Urol 150 1993 1845
7. J.A. Smith Jr, R.C. Chan, and S.S. Chang A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy J Urol 178 2007 2385
8. M.A. White, A.P. De Haan, and D.D. Stephens Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology 73 2009 567
9. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibaniet Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037
10. O. Yossepowitch, A. Bjartell, and J.A. Eastham Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences Eur Urol 55 2009 87
11. M. Liss, K. Osann, and D. Ornstein Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors BJU Int 102 2008 603
12. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and S. Seccoet Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy J Urol 182 2009 2682
13. R.F. Coelho, S. Chauhan, and M.A. Orvieto predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 57 2010 e53
14. J.A. Wieder, and M.S. Soloway Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 160 1998 299
15. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibaniet Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037
16. R.F. Coelho, S. Chauhan, and K.J. Palmer Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes BJU Int 104 2009 1428
17. R.F. Coelho, B. Rocco, and M.B. Patel Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers J Endourol 24 2010 2003
18. B. Guillonneau, H. el-Fettouh, and H. Baumert Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute J Urol 169 2003 1261
19. L. Salomon, A.G. Anastasiadis, and O. Levrel Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer Urology 61 2003 386
20. J.F. Borin, D.W. Skarecky, and N. Narula Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Urology 70 2007 173
21. J.A. Eastham, K. Kuroiwa, and M. Ohori Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 70 2007 965
22. Y. Kordan, S. Salem, and S.S. Chang Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Urol 182 2009 2695
23. J.A. Pettus, C.J. Weight, and C.J. Thompson Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location J Urol 172 2004 129
24. K.C. Zorn, M.A. Orvieto, and A.A. Mikhail Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Urology 69 2007 300
25. B.A. Link, R. Nelson, and D.Y. Josephson The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 180 2008 928
26. E.P. Castle, F. Atug, and M. Woods Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy World J Urol 26 2008 91
27. M.P. Herman, J.D. Raman, and S. Dong Increasing body mass index negatively impacts outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy JSLS 11 2007 438
28. A.L. Wiltz, S. Shikanov, and S.E. Eggener Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes Urology 73 2009 316
29. D.J. Moskovic, H.J. Lavery, and J. Rehman High body mass index does not affect outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Can J Urol 17 2010 5291
30. S. Chauhan, R.F. Coelho, and B. Rocco Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Int Braz J Urol 36 2010 259