Continence Definition After Radical Prostatectomy Using Urinary Quality of Life: Evaluation of Patient Reported Validated Questionnaires

Journal of Urology

Volumn 183, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1464-1468

  Liss, Michael A ^a   Osann, Kathryn ^a   Canvasser, Noah ^a   Chu, William ^a   Chang, Alexandra ^a   Gan, Jennifer ^a   Li, Roger ^a   Santos, Rosanne ^a   Skarecky, Douglas ^a   Finley, David S ^a   Ahlering, Thomas E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

incontinence pads; prostate; prostatectomy; quality of life; questionnaires

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; STANDARD; URINARY FREQUENCY; URINE INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAPERS, ADULT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 77949278687     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bauer R.M., Bastian P.J., Gozzi C., et al. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol 55 (2009) 322
2. Catalona W.J., Carvalhal G.F., Mager D.E., et al. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162 (1999) 433
3. Grise P., and Thurman S. Urinary incontinence following treatment of localized prostate cancer. Cancer Control 8 (2001) 532
4. Stanford J.L., Feng Z., Hamilton A.S., et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283 (2000) 354
5. Olsson L.E., Salomon L., Nadu A., et al. Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 58 (2001) 570
6. Krupski T.L., Saigal C.S., and Litwin M.S. Variation in continence and potency by definition. J Urol 170 (2003) 1291
7. Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Marcovich R., et al. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164 (2000) 744
8. Sacco E., Prayer-Galetti T., Pinto F., et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 97 (2006) 1234
9. Lepor H., Kaci L., and Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol 171 (2004) 1212
10. Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Ricker D., et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55 (2000) 58
11. van Kampen M., De Weerdt W., van Poppel H., et al. Prediction of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 60 (1998) 80
12. Rodriguez E., Skarecky D.W., and Ahlering T.E. Post-robotic prostatectomy urinary continence: characterization of perfect continence versus occasional dribbling in pad-free men. Urology 67 (2006) 785
13. Kielb S., Dunn D.L., Rashid M.G., et al. Assessment of early continence recover after radical prostatectomy: patient reported symptoms and impairment. J Urol 166 (2001) 958
14. Litwin M.S., Lubeck D.P., Henning J.M., et al. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J Urol 159 (1998) 1988
15. Barry M.J., Fowler F.J., O'Leary M.P., et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148 (1992) 1549
16. Fowler F., Marry M., Lu-Yao G., et al. Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from a Medicare survey. Urology 45 (1995) 1007
17. Lepor H., and Kaci L. The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol 171 (2004) 1216