Discrepancies in perception of urinary incontinence between patient and physician after robotic radical prostatectomy

Yonsei Medical Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 883-887

  Lee, Seung Ryeol ^a   Kim, Hong Wook ^b   Lee, Jae Won ^b   Jeong, Woo Ju ^b   Rha, Koon Ho ^b   Kim, Jang Hwan ^b  

^a CHA University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Questionnaire; Radical prostatectomy; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 77957941578     PISSN: 05135796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.883     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000;55:58-61.
2. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Horn L, Truss MC, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 2003;169:2066-71.
3. Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, Deger S, Zumbé J, Hofmockel G, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 2006;49:113-9.
4. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005;174:269-72.
5. Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, Fracalanza S, Betto G, Pagano F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2006;97:1234-41.
6. Krupski TL, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. Variation in continence and potency by definition. J Urol 2003;170:1291-4.
7. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23: 322-30.
8. Eisen SV. Assessment of subjective distress by patients' selfreport versus structured interview. Psychol Rep 1995;76:35-9.
9. Litwin MS, Lubeck DP, Henning JM, Carroll PR. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J Urol 1998;159:1988-92.
10. Dylewski DA, Jamison MG, Borawski KM, Sherman ND, Amundsen CL, Webster GD. A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:3-7.
11. Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Djurhuus JC, Hermann AP. No relationship between subjective assessment of urinary incontinence and pad test weight gain in a random population sample of menopausal women. J Urol 1998;159:800-3.
12. Karantanis E, Fynes M, Moore KH, Stanton SL. Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfuncet 2004;15:111-6.
13. Suardi N, Scattoni V, Briganti A, Salonia A, Naspro R, Gallina A, et al. Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients previously submitted to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 2008;53:1180-5.
14. Tannenbaum C, Corcos J. Outcomes in urinary incontinence: reconciling clinical relevance with scientific rigour. Eur Urol 2008; 53:1151-61.
15. Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol 2009;55:322-33.