Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-55

  Mendoza, Pierre J ^a   Stern, Joshua M ^a   Li, Amy Y ^a   Jaffe, William ^a   Kovell, Robert ^a   Mary Nguyen, R N ^a   Rachel Natale, P A C ^a   Kelly Monahan, P A C ^a   Bergey, Meredith R ^a   Lee, David I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CONTINENCE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN SIZE; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; URETHRA;

HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGAN SIZE; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 79951595216     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0184     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007;110:1951-1958. (Pubitemid 350036853)
2. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51:648-658. (Pubitemid 46097286)
3. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007;178:2385-2390. (Pubitemid 350052156)
4. Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL, et al. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007;70:945-949. (Pubitemid 350192578)
5. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Chou D, Skarecky DW. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 2005;65:994-997. (Pubitemid 40692999)
6. Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JD. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: Results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008;180:1018-1023.
7. Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:996-1003. (Pubitemid 46281421)
8. Eggleston JC, Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Pathological findings in the first 100 cases. J Urol 1985;134:1146-1148. (Pubitemid 16207018)
9. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 1983;4:473-485. (Pubitemid 14236144)
10. Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, et al. Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2002;168: 1032-1035.
11. Parapel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: Association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol, 2008.
12. Konety BR, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR, et al. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: The impact of prostate volume- analysis from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 2007;177:1423-1426. (Pubitemid 46435979)
13. Frota R, Turna B, Santos BM, et al. The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008;101:589-593. (Pubitemid 351199271)
14. Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:601-606. (Pubitemid 36294199)
15. Milhoua PM, Koi PT, Lowe D, Ghavamian R. Issue of prostate gland size, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and continence revisited. Urology 2008;71:417-420. (Pubitemid 351374713)
16. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1250-1261. (Pubitemid 351439226)
17. Rahmouni A, Yang A, Tempany CM, et al. Accuracy of invivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16: 934-940.
18. Pettus JA, Masterson T, Sokol A, et al. Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009;182: 949-955.
19. Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol 2004;171:1212-1215. (Pubitemid 38327562)