Defining and measuring patient-centred care: An example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature

Health Expectations

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 295-326

  Lawrence, Maggie ^a   Kinn, Sue ^b  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Department for International Development   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Care; Definition of patient centred care; Outcome measures; Patient involvement; Patientcentred; Patients and families; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FAMILY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MENTAL HEALTH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; FAMILY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL HEALTH; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864430861     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00683.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Department of Health. The New NHS: Modern Dependable. London: TSO, 1997.
2. Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London: Department of Health, 1999.
3. Department of Health. Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London: Department of Health, 2005.
4. Department of Health. High Quality Care for All - NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: Department of Health, 2008.
5. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 2000; 51: 1087-1100.
6. Kennedy I. Patients are experts in their own field. BMJ, 2003; 326: 1276-1277.
7. UK Government. Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/28/contents/enacted, accessed 10 April 2010.
8. Gillespie R, Florin D, Gillam S. How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda?Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 142-148.
9. Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle VA, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2001; Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003267. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.
10. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 2002; 48: 51-56.
11. Wressle E, Öeberg B, Henriksson C. The rehabilitation process for the geriatric stroke patient-an exploratory study of goal setting and interventions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1999; 21: 80-87.
12. Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2007; 29: 156-1574.
13. Ellis-Hill C, Robison J, Wiles R et al. Going home to get on with life: patients and carers experiences of being discharged from hospital following a stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2009; 31: 61-72.
14. Redfern J, McKevitt C, Wolfe C. Risk management after stroke: the limits of a patient-centred approach. Health, Risk & Society, 2006; 8: 123-141.
15. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000197. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2
16. Long A. The User's Perspective in Outcome Measurement: An Overview of the Issues. 8. Leeds: UK Clearing House on Health Outcomes, University of Leeds, 1996.
17. Goodrich J. Exploring the wide range of terminology used to describe care that is patient-centred. Nursing Times, 2009; 105: 14-17.
18. Burton C. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000; 32: 301-309.
19. Visser-Meily A, Post M, Gorter J et al. Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2006; 28: 1557-1561.
20. Duncan P, Wallace D, Studenski S et al. Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: the Stroke Impact Scale. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2001; 8: 19-33.
21. Dowswell G, Lawler J, Dowswell T et al. Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2000; 9: 507-515.
22. Kersten P, Low J, Ashburn A et al. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2002; 24: 860-866.
23. Blickem C, Priyadharshini E. Patient narratives: the potential for 'patient-centred' interprofessional learning?Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2007; 21: 619-632.
24. Brott T, Adams H, Olinger C et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke, 1989; 20: 864-870.
25. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 1965; 14: 61-65.
26. Granger C, Hamilton B, Keith R et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 1986; 1: 59-74.
27. Holbrook M, Skilbeck C. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 1983; 12: 166-170.
28. Long A, Hesketh A, Paszek G et al. Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2008; 22: 1083-1094.
29. Kjellström T, Norrving B, Shatchkute A. The Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European Stroke Strategies. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2007; 23: 229-241.
30. Trigg R, Wood V, Hewer L. Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clinical Rehabilitation, 1999; 13: 341-353.
31. Harden A. Extending the boundaries of systematic reviews to integrate different types of study: examples of methods developed within reviews on young people's health. In: Popay J (ed.) Moving Beyond Effectiveness in Evidence Synthesis. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006: 31-40.
32. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York, 2009.
33. Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-Based Rehabilitation Services for Stroke Patients at Home. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003; Issue 1. Art. No. CD002925.
34. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
35. Lawrence M. Patient-Centred Stroke Care: Young Adults and their Families, PhD thesis. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University, 2009.
36. Jackson J, Kinn S, Dalgarno P. Patient-centred outcomes in dietary research. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2005; 18: 83-92.
37. Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual: 2008 edition. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2008. http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/Documents/JBIReviewManual_CiP11449.pdf, accessed 10 April 2010.
38. Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J et al. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth, 2002; 29: 225-250.
39. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C et al. Evaluating Meta-Ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 2003; 56: 671-684.
40. Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ, 2004; 328: 1010-1012.
41. Glass T, Dym B, Greenberg S et al. Psychosocial intervention in stroke: Families in Recovery from Stroke Trial (FIRST). American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2000; 70: 169-181.
42. Glass T, Berkman L, Hiltunen E et al. The Families in Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): primary study results. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2004; 66: 889-897.
43. Secrest J. Transformation of the relationship: the experience of primary support persons of stroke survivors. Rehabilitation Nursing, 2000; 25: 93-99.
44. Grant J, Davis L. Living with loss: the stroke family caregiver. Journal of Family Nursing, 1997; 3: 36-56.
45. Fox L, Poulsen S, Bawden K et al. Critical elements and outcomes of a residential family-based intervention for aphasia caregivers. Aphasiology, 2004; 18: 1177-1199.
46. Nordehn G, Meredith A, Bye L. A preliminary investigation of barriers to achieving patient-centered communication with patients who have stroke-related communication disorders. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2006; 13: 68-77.
47. Harris J, Eng J. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Canada, 2004; 56: 171-176.
48. Clark J, Rugg S. The importance of independence in toileting: the views of stroke survivors and their occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2005; 68: 165-171.
49. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1998; 12: 338-347.
50. Ekstam L, Uppgard B, von Koch L et al. Functioning in everyday life after stroke: a longitudinal study of elderly people receiving rehabilitation at home. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 2007; 27: 434-446.
51. Studenski S, Wallace D, Duncan P et al. Predicting stroke recovery: three- and six-month rates of patient-centered functional outcomes based on the Orpington Prognostic Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2001; 49: 308-312.
52. Jansa J, Sicherl Z, Angleitner K et al. The use of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in clients with an acute stroke. WFOT Bulletin, 2004; 50: 18-23.
53. Ljungberg C, Hanson E, Loevgren M. A home rehabilitation program for stroke patients: a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2001; 15: 44-53.
54. van Bennekom C, Jelles F, Lankhorst G et al. Value of measuring perceived problems in a stroke population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1996; 10: 288-294.
55. Kersten P, George S, Low J et al. The subjective index of physical and social outcome: its usefulness in a younger stroke population. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2004; 27: 59-63.
56. Cup E, Scholte op Reimer W, Thijssen M et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2003; 17: 402-409.
57. Townend E, Brady M, McLauglan K. A systematic evaluation of the adaptation of depression diagnostic methods for stroke survivors who have aphasia. Stroke, 2007; 38: 3076-3083.
58. Shuldham C, Fleming S, Yorke J. Undertaking a systematic review: the road to successful completion. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2008; 13: 282-298.
59. Wade D, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1987; 50: 177-182.
60. de Haan R, Limburg M, Bossuyut P et al. The clinical meaning of Rankin 'handicap' grades. Stroke, 1995; 26: 2027-2030.
61. Lavis J. How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?PLoS Medicine, 2009; 6: e1000141.
62. Kirkevold M. The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2002; 24: 887-898.
63. Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 2009; 339: b2700.