Social reintegration after stroke: The first stages in the development of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO)

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 341-353

  Trigg, Richard ^a   Wood, Victorine A ^a   Hewer, Richard Langton ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; INTERVIEW; LEISURE; MONEY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CENTER; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIOLOGY; STROKE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL ISOLATION;

EID: 0032803009     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026921599676390259     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. The Lancet 1992; 339: 342-44.
2. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. The reliability of stroke outcome measures. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 290-96.
3. Langton Hewer R. Outcome measures in stroke. A British view. Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II): II-52-II-55.
4. Wood-Dauphine SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Meet Rehabil 1988; 69: 583-90.
5. Seale C, Davies P. Outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation research, lnt Disabil Stud 1987; 9: 155-60.
6. Wood PHN, Bradley EM. Contribution of epidemiology to health care planning for people with disabilities. In: Granger CV, Gresham GE eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore and London: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.
7. Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787-805.
8. Chambers LW, Sackett CH, Goldsmith AS, Macpherson AS, McAuley RG. Development and application of an index of social function. Health Services Res 1976; Winter: 430-41.
9. Hunt SM et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15a: 221-29.
10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
11. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166-70.
12. Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33: 1111-15.
13. O'Mahony P, Rogers G, Thomson R, Dobson R, James O. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? Age Ageing 1998; 27: 19-21.
14. Belanger L, Bolduc M, Noel M. Relative importance of after effects, environment and socio-economic factors on the social integration of stroke victims, Int J Rehabil Res 1988; 11: 251-60.
15. Wolfensberger W. Normalization: the principal of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation, 1972.
16. DeJong Z, Van Der Heijde D, McKenna SP, Whalley D. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQol: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 878-83.
17. Wood VA, Langton Hewer R. Development of a stroke and neurological rehabilitation unit in a district general hospital. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1996; 30: 533-37.
18. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, second edition. London: Sage, 1996.
19. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1990.
20. Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Shaw C. Research methods in psychology. London: Sage, 1995.
21. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997; 28: 1541-49.
22. Sandin KJ, Cifu DX, Noll SF. Stroke rehabilitation 4. Psychologic and social implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: S-52-S-55.
23. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ ed. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes, 1987: 137-47.
24. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
25. Ware JE. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Disabil 1987; 40: 473-80.
26. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Epidemiologic profile of long-term stroke disability: the Framingham study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 487-91.
27. Labi MLC, Philips TF, Gresham GE. Psychosocial disability in physically restored long-term stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980; 61: 561-65.
28. Lawrence L, Christie D. Quality of life after stroke - a 3 year follow-up. Age Ageing 1979; 3: 167-72.
29. Drummond A. Leisure activity after stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 157-60.
30. Bond MJ, Harris RD, Smith DS, Clark MS. An examination of the factor structure of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 27-29.
31. Angeleri F, Angeleri VA, Foschi N, Giaquinto S, Nolfe G. Influence of depression, social activity and family stress on functional outcome after stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 1478-83.
32. Astrom M, Asplund K, Astrom T. Psychosocial function and life satisfaction after stroke. Stroke 1992; 23: 527-31.
33. World Health Organisation. ICIDH-2: International Classification of Impairments, Activities and Participation: A manual of dimensions of disablement and health, www.who.int/msa/mnh/ems/icidh/introduction.htm
34. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Skilbeck CE, David RM. Stroke. A critical approach to diagnosis, treatment and management. London: Chapman & Hall, 1985.
35. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge, 1993.