The subjective index of physical and social outcome: Its usefulness in a younger stroke population

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 59-63

  Kersten, Paula ^a,b   George, Steve ^a   Low, Joseph ^b   Ashburn, Ann ^b   McLellan, Lindsay ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Outcome assessment; Stroke outcome; Young adults

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; EMPLOYMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CLINICAL CARE; SUBJECTIVE INDEX;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 1642387300     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200403000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Ballinger C, Ashburn A, Low J, Roderick P (1999). Unpacking the black box of therapy - a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 13:301-309.
2. Belanger L, Bolduc M, Noel M (2001). Relative importance of after effects, environment and socio-economic factors on the social integration of stroke victims. Journal of Rehabilitation Research 11:251-260.
3. Bowling A (1997) Research methods in health. Investigating health and health services. Open University Press.
4. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, Di Guiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R et al. (2002). Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. British Medical Journal 324:1183-1185.
5. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD (1993). Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 72:84-89.
6. Kersten P, Low J, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL (2002). The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disability and Rehabilitation 24:860-866.
7. Low J, Kersten P, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL (2003). The unmet needs of young people with stroke affiliated to Young Stroke Groups of the UK Stroke Association. Disability and Rehabilitation 25(18):1052-1056.
8. Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, Diaz S (1998). Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79:329-335.
9. Streiner DL, Norman JR (1995). Reliability. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 104-127.
10. Trigg R, Wood VA, Langton Hewer R (1999). Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clinical Rehabilitation 13:341-353.
11. Trigg R, Wood VA (2000). The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO): a new measure for use with stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 14:288-299.
12. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN (1992). Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 73:6-526.