Design of a motivational scaffold for the malaysian e-Learning environment

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 137-151

  Alias, Nor Aziah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

e Learning; Motivational scaffolding; Regulation of motivation; Task support

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864398420     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson, A. (2008). Seven major challenges for e-learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka, International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 4(3). Retrieved February 5, 2010, from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewissue.php?id=17#Refereed_Articles
2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Thomas, L., Seibert, D., &Tron, M.(2003). Online process scaffolding and students' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
3. Azevedo, R. &Hadwin, A. F. (2005).Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds, Instructional Science (2005)33, 367-379.
4. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24.
5. Bauman, M. (1997). Online learning communities. Retrieved October 2, 2004, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii. edu/org/tcc_conf97/pres/bauman.html#STUDIFF
6. Boyer, N. R., & Maher, P.A. (2004). Constructing scaffolds for social online learning: Using self-directed frameworks with virtual groups, International Journal of Self-directed learning, 1(1), 26-38.
7. Boyer, K. E., Phillips, R., Wallis, M,Vouk, M., & Lester, J. (2008). Balancing cognitive and motivational scaffolding in tutorial dialogue. In B. Woolf et al. (Eds.): ITS 2008, LNCS 5091, 239-249, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, concept makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
9. Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34, 75-86.
10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Science 2(2), 141-178.
11. Chang, C. (2003). Towards a distributed web based learning community, Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 27-42.
12. Cho, K., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.
13. Churton, M. (2003, November). Transitioning to e-learning: Pedagogical and support considerations. Keynote address at the 17th AAOU Annual Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
14. Cicognani, A.(2000). Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 150-158.
15. El Saadawi, M., Azevedo, R., Castine, M., Payne, V., Medvedeva, M., Tseytlin, E., Legowski, E., Jukic, D., & Crowley, R. S. (2010). Factors affecting feeling-of-knowing in a medical intelligent tutoring system: the role of immediate feedback as a metacognitive scaffold, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(1), 9-30.
16. Flagg, B. N. (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Grant, A. M. (2001, November). Coaching for enhanced performance: Comparing cognitive and behavioural approaches to coaching. Paper presented at the 3rd International Spearman Seminar, Sydney, Australia.
18. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4 (12). Retrieved August 15, 2003, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_12/hara/index.html
19. Hisham Dzakiria & Rozhan Idrus. (2003). Teacher-learner interactions in distance education: A case of two Malaysian universities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(3). Retrieved March 5, 2004, http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde11/abs/idrus_abs.htm
20. Jain, K. K., Abu, N. K., Akhbar, A., &Amat-Sapuan, D. (2004). Retaining e-learners: A case study of Universiti Tun Abdul Razak. Pranjana: The Journal of Management Awareness, IMANTEC, 7 (2). Retrieved January 15, 2010, from www.indianmba.com/Journals/J47/j47.html
21. Kawachi, P. (2003). Initiating intrinsic motivation in online education: Review of the current state of the art, Interactive Learning Environments, 11(1), 59-81.
22. Kim, Y., Hamilton, E. R., Zheng, J., Baylor, A. L. (2006). Scaffolding learner motivation through a virtual peer, Proceedings of the 7thInternational Conference on Learning Sciences 2006 (pp.335-341), Bloomington, Indiana.
23. Ludwig-Hardman, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (2003). Learner support services for online students: Scaffolding for success. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, April 2003. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/131/211
24. McMahon, M. (2002). Designing an on-line environment to scaffold cognitive self-regulation, in Quality Conversations, Proceedings of the 25th HERDSA Annual Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 7-10 July 2002, 457-46.
25. McLoughlin, C., & Marshall, L. (2000, February). Scaffolding: A model for learner support in an online teaching environment. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000.Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
26. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58-72.
27. Norton, P. (2005). Scaffolding online learning: The art of mentoring. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (pp. 2025-2032). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
28. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Edith Cowan University Publication, Western Australia.
29. Patton, M. Q (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
30. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). Introduction to Educational Design Research. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
31. Reeves, T. C. (2000, April), Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through " design experiments" and other development research strategies. Paper presented at the International Perspectives on Instructional Technology Research for the 21st century, New Orleans.
32. Reeves, T., and Harmon, S. (1993). User Interface Rating Tool for Interactive Multimedia. Georgia Tech. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://abanksto.myweb.uga.edu/edit6200/project/uirating.pdf
33. Reigeluth, C. M. & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative Research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories in Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.) Instructional design theories and models Vol II. (pp. 633-651). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Richey, R., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Rosenberg, M. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age, New York: McGraw Hill.
36. Shelton, B. E. & Scoresby, J. (2010). Aligning game activity with educational goals: Following a constrained design approach to instructional computer games, ETRD, DOI 10.1007/s11423-010-9175-0.
37. Song, L., & Hill, J. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments, Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(1), 27-42.
38. Teo, C. B. K., & Gay, R. (2006). Concept map provision for e-learning, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(7), 17-32.
39. Timmis, S. E., & Cook, J. H. (2001). Motivating students towards online learning: institutional strategies and imperatives. Proceedings of the New Educational Benefits of ICT in Higher Education, 71-77, OECR, 2001.
40. Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes, Computers & Education, 49(2007), 414-422.
41. Uzma Mazhar (2002). Six steps to change. Retrieved October 28, 2004, from http://www.crescentlife.com/articles/islamicpsych/6stepstowardchange.htm
42. Van Den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. Van Den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Winnips, K. (2001). Scaffolding-by-design: A model for WWW-based learner support. Enschede: University of Twente Press.
45. Winnips, K., & Mcloughlin, C. (2001). Six WWW-Based Learner Supports you can Build. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2001(1), 2062-2067.
46. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
47. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
48. Xie, Y., & Sharma, P. (2010). Exploring evidence of reflective thinking in student artifacts of blogging-mapping tool: A designbased research approach. Instructional Science, DOI:10.1007/s11251-010-9149-y.
49. Ziguras, C. (2001). Educational technology in transnational higher education in South East Asia: The cultural politics of flexible learning. Educational Technology & Society, 4(4), 8-18.