Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced online learning

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 150-158

  Cicognani, Anna ^a  

^a OzEmail Internet   (Australia)

Author keywords

Concept mapping; Databases; Online learning; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042631061     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (24)

1. Ault, C. R. (1985). Concept Mapping as a Study Strategy in Earth Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 15 (1), 38-44.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Vol. 1 - Cognitive Domains, New York: David McKay Company.
3. Bloom, B. S. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Vol. 2 - Affective Domains, New York: David McKay Company.
4. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Davidson, K. (1998). Education in the Internet. Linking Theory to Reality, http://www.oise.ou.ca/∼kdavidson/cons.html
6. Ferry, B., Hedberg, J. and Harper, B. (1998). How do preservice teachers use concept maps to organize their curriculum content knowledge? Working document available from brian_ferry@uow.edu.au.
7. Gay, G. & Lentini, M. (1995). Use of Communication Resources in a Networked Collaborative Design Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1 (1), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue1/IMG_JCMC/ ResourceUse.html
8. Hirschberg, U. (1998). Fake.space - An Online CAAD Community and a Joint Enquiry into the Nature of Space. CAADRIA98 Conference Proceedings, Osaka, Japan, http://caadria98.env.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/
9. Hoadley, C. M. & Hsi, S. (1993). A Multimedia Interface for Knowledge Building and Collaborative Learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, April 24-29, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10. Kaye, A. R. (1992). Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, Berlin: Springer.
11. Kelly, P. & Odom, L. (1997). The union of concept mapping and the learning cycle for meaningful learning: Diffusion and osmosis. National Science Teachers Association - National Convention Conference Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana.
12. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. (1984). Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist, 10, 1123-1134.
13. Koschmann, T. D. (1993/1994). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3).
14. Kurmann, D. (1999). Informotion. In G. Jingwen and W. Zhaoji (Eds.) CAADRIA, Conference Proceedings, Shanghai, China: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Publishing House, 133-141.
15. Lea, M. (1992). Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication, London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
16. Matheson, K. & Zanna, M. (1989). Impact of computer-mediated communication on self awareness. Computers in Human Behaviour, 4, 221-233.
17. Mikulecky, L., Clark, E. S. & Adams, S. M. (1989). Teaching concept mapping and university level strategies using computers. Journal of Reading, May, 694-702.
18. Novak, J. D. (1984). Learning How to Learn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B. & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge Vee Mapping with Junior High School Science Students. Science Education, 72 (4), 489-500.
20. Okebukola, P. A. & Jegede, O. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72 (4), 489-500.
21. O'Malley, C. (1995). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer.
22. Plumbdesign(1999). Visual Thesaurus, http://www.plumbdesign.com/ thesaurus/
23. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). Special Issue on Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12.
24. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interactions: a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.