Scaffolding learner motivation through a virtual peer

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 335-341

  Kim, Yanghee ^a   Hamilton, Eric R ^b   Zheng, Jinjie ^a   Baylor, Amy L ^c  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; COLLEGE STUDENTS; DIGITAL CHARACTERS; EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIONS; EMOTIONAL RESPONSE; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; LEARNING AND COGNITIVE; SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS;

MOTIVATION; STUDENTS;

SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 52949147994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (Eds.)-(2000). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
5. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(4), 4-16.
6. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 1-23.
7. Brody, L. (1999). Gender, emotion, and the family: Messachusetts: Harvard University Press.
8. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C, Lundeberg, M, & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 553-574.
9. Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725-741.
10. Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-272.
11. Dietz, J. S., Anderson, B., & Katzenmeyer, C. (2002). Women and the crossroads of science: Thoughts on policy, research, and evaluation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 395-408.
12. Jeong, A., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2003). Gender interactions in online debates: Look who's arguing with whom. Paper presented at the The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
13. John-Steiner, V. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
14. Kim, Y. (2005). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: Building social relations with learners. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
16. Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
17. Lee, E. (2003). Effects of gender of the computer on informational social influence: The moderating role of task type. International Journal of 'Human-Computer Studies, 58, 347-361.
18. Mclnerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2000). Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
19. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
20. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffoldig and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
21. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149-174.
24. Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer model attributes and children's achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54-61.
25. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning diabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344-364.
26. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327-358.
27. Weiner, B. (1992). Motivation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed., pp. 860-865). New York: Macmillan
28. Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social goals and social relationships as motivators of school adjustment. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 226-247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.
30. Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215-246.