Correction to The Burden of Social Proof: Shared Thresholds and Social Influence [Psychologial Review] DOI:10.1037/a0027121;The burden of social proof: Shared thresholds and social influence

Psychological Review

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 345-372

  MacCoun, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformity; Deliberation; Influence; Jury; Threshold

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSENSUS; COOPERATION; CROWDING; HUMAN; IMITATION; LEADERSHIP; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSENSUS; HELPING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; LEADERSHIP; MASS BEHAVIOR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL CONFORMITY;

EID: 84864302259     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027790     Document Type: Erratum

References (160)

1. Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18-28. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18
2. Aarts, H., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). Goal-directed behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3. Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2005). Why can't we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum, 3(2), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol3/iss2/art1
4. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
5. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage University Paper No. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
7. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Bryne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036
8. Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. The American Economic Review, 84, 406-411.
9. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men: Research in human relations (pp. 177-190). Oxford, England: Carnegie Press.
10. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31-35. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
11. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(Whole No. 416).
12. Augustin, T. (2005). An approach to combine the logistic threshold model of psychophysics with the Bradley-Terry-Luce models of choice theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 70-79. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2004.11.002
13. Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Bailenson, J. N., & Rips, L. J. (1996). Informal reasoning and burden of proof. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 3-16. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199611)10:7<3::AID-ACP434>3.0.CO;2-7
15. Banta, K. W. (1989, November 27). Leipzig: Hotbed of protest. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com
16. Bass, F. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215-227. doi:10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
17. Berkson, J. (1944). Application of the logistic function to bio-assay. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39, 357-365. doi: 10.2307/2280041
18. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. The Journal of Political Economy, 100, 992-1026. doi:10.1086/261849
19. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397-479). Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.
20. Bond, R. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354. doi:10.1177/1368430205056464
21. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Braun, N. (1995). Individual thresholds and social diffusion. Rationality and Society, 7, 167-182. doi:10.1177/1043463195007002005
23. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
24. Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N., Sneyd, J., Bonabeau, E., & Theraulaz, G. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 457-468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.457
26. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Caulkins, J. P., Behrens, D. A., Knoll, C., Tragler, G., & Zuba, D. (2004). Markov chain modeling of initiation and demand: The case of the US cocaine epidemic. Health Care Management Science, 7, 319-329. doi:10.1007/s10729-004-7540-4
28. Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture-gene coevolution, normpsychology, and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218-226. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003
29. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
31. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
32. Coombs, C. (1964). A theory of data. New York, NY: Wiley.
33. Coultas, J. C. (2004). When in Rome...Anevolutionary perspective on conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 74, 317-331. doi:10.1177/1368430204046141
34. Couzin, I. D. (2009). Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 36-43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002
35. Cramer, J. S. (2003). Logit models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Daley, D. J., & Gani, J. (1999). Epidemic modelling: An introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125. doi: 10.1037/h0033951
38. Dawes, R. M., & Mulford, M. (1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 201-211. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0020
39. De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., & Acton, G. S. (2005). A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions. Psychological Review, 112, 129-158. doi:10.1037/0033295X.112.1.129
40. De Fleur, M. L. (1966). Mass communication and social change. Social Forces, 44, 314-326.
41. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. doi:10.1037/h0046408
42. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
43. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
44. Evans, J. W. (2003). Have Americans' attitudes become more polarized? An update. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 71-90. doi:10.1111/15406237.8401005
45. Fechner, G. (1966). Elemente der psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics] (Vol. 1, H. E. Adler, Trans.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1860)
46. Feller, W. (1957). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (2nd ed., Vol. 1). New York, NY: Wiley.
47. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
48. Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (Eds.). (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
50. French, J. P. R., Jr., & Raven, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 607-623). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
51. Gärdenfors, P. (2000). The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82. doi:10.1037/h0025325
53. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
54. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models for collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420-1443. doi:10.1086/226707
55. Granovetter, M., & Soong, R. (1983). Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9, 165-179. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1983.9989941
56. Grodzins, M. M. (1958). The metropolitan area as a racial problem. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
57. Harré, R., Clarke, D. D., & De Carlo, N. (1985). Motives and mechanisms: An introduction to the psychology of action. London, England: Methuen.
58. Harvey, M. D., & Enzle, M. E. (1981). A cognitive model of social norms for understanding the transgression-helping effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 866-875. doi:10.1037/00223514.41.5.866
59. Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review, 112, 494-508. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.494
60. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0708
62. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 215-241. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00018-X
63. Hertel, G., & Kerr, N. L. (2001). Priming and in-group favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 316-324. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1447
64. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705
65. Hull, C. L. (1938). The goal-gradient hypothesis applied to some 'field-force' problems in the behavior of young children. Psychological Review, 45, 271-299. doi:10.1037/h0053885
66. Kagehiro, D. K., & Stanton, W. C. (1985). Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178. doi:10.1007/BF01067049
67. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
68. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153. doi:10.1037/0033295X.93.2.136
69. Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60. doi:10.1177/002200275800200106
71. Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Stasser, G., Meek, D., Holt, R. W., & Davis, J. H. (1976). Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282-294. doi:10.1037/00223514.34.2.282
72. Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. J. (1985). The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363. doi:10.1037/00223514.48.2.349
73. Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. J. (in press). Is the leniency asymmetry really dead? Misinterpreting asymmetry effects in criminal jury deliberation. Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations.
74. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., Hansen, C. H., & Hymes, J. A. (1987). Gaining and losing social support: Momentum in decision-making groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 119-145. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(87)90028-X
75. Kerr, N., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.687
76. Kerr, N. L., Stasser, G., & Davis, J. H. (1979). Model testing, model fitting, and social decision schemes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 399-410. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(79)90006-0
77. Kimble, G. A. (1996). Psychology: The hope of a science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Knowles, E. S. (1999). Distance matters more than you think! Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1045-1048. doi:10.1177/01461672992511011
79. Kriss, M., Kinchla, R. A., & Darley, J. M. (1977). A mathematical model for social influences on perceptual judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 403-420. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90026-9
80. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596-610. doi:10.1037/00223514.67.4.596
81. Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187-208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187
82. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
83. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
84. Latané, B., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1975). Sex, group size and helping in three cities. Sociometry, 38, 180-194. doi:10.2307/2786599
85. Latané, B., & Darley, J. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
86. Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453. doi:10.1037/0033295X.88.5.438
87. Laughlin, P. R. (1999). Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 50-69. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2854
88. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1-62. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
89. Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage University Paper No. 101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Liu, J. H., & Latané, B. (1998). The catastrophic link between the importance and extremity of political attitudes. Political Behavior, 20, 105-126. doi:10.1023/A:1024828729174
91. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
92. Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of Eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 20, 139-148. doi: 10.1007/BF02288986
93. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
94. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: An introduction and critical survey. New York, NY: Wiley.
95. MacCoun, R. J. (1984). Modeling the impact of extralegal bias and defined standards of proof on the decisions of mock jurors and juries. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 700B.
96. MacCoun, R. J. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 259-287. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259
97. MacCoun, R. J., Cook, P., Muschkin, C., & Vigdor, J. (2008). Distinguishing spurious and real norm effects: Evidence from artificial societies, small-group experiments, and real schoolyards. Review of Law & Economics, 4, 695-714. doi:10.2202/1555-5879.1226
98. MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
99. MacCoun, R. J., & Paletz, S. (2009). Citizens' perceptions of ideological bias in research on public policy controversies. Political Psychology, 30, 43-65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00680.x
100. MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. (2001). Drug war heresies: Learning from other vices, times, and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511754272
101. Macy, M. W. (1991). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56, 730-747. doi:10.2307/2096252
102. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. (1995). Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Management Science, 14, G79-G88.
103. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
104. McFadden, D. (2001). Economic choices (2000 Nobel Lecture). The American Economic Review, 91, 351-378. doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.351
105. McGuire, W. J. (1968). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
106. Meiser, T., Hein-Eggers, M., Rompe, P., & Rudinger, G. (1995). Analyzing homogeneity and heterogeneity of change using Rasch and latent class models: A comparative and integrative approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 377-391. doi:10.1177/014662169501900407
107. Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79-82. doi:10.1037/h0028070
108. Miller, C. M., McIntyre, S. H., & Mantrala, M. K. (1993). Toward formalizing fashion theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 142-157. doi:10.2307/3172824
109. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influences of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380. doi:10.2307/2786541
110. Mullen, B. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90025-2
111. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
112. National Opinion Research Center. (2009). GSS methodological report No. 24. Retrieved from http://www.norc.org/GSS+Website/Data+Analysis/
113. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32. doi:10.1037/0033295X.93.1.23
114. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitudes to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social opinion. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.362
115. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1994). Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
116. Parker, S., Casey, J., Ziriax, J. M., & Silberberg, A. (1988). Random monotone data fit simple algebraic models: Correlation is not confirmation. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 417-423. doi:10.1037/00332909.104.3.417
117. Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1980). A computer simulation of jury decision making. Psychological Review, 87, 133-159. doi:1037/0033295X.87.2.133
118. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
119. Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
120. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of norms by unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 161-209. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60238-5
121. Reise, S. P., Ainsworth, A. T., & Haviland, M. G. (2005). Item response theory: Fundamentals, applications, and promise in psychological research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 95-101. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00342.x
122. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
123. Rosenwein, R. E., & Campbell, D. T. (1992). Mobilization to achieve collective action and democratic majority/plurality amplification. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 125-138. doi:10.1111/j.15404560.1992.tb00888.x
124. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1, pp. 45-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
125. Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15-24.
126. Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59, 488-493.
127. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143-186.
128. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York, NY: Norton.
129. Smith, E. R. (2009). Distributed connectionist models in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 64-76. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00160.x
130. Smoke, W. H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1962). On the reliability of group judgments and decisions. In J. H. Crisswell, H. Solomon, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in small group processes (pp. 322-333). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
131. Sorkin, R. D., Hays, C. J., & West, R. (2001). Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 183-203. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.183
132. Stasser, G., & Davis, J. H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.523
133. Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 327-355). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
134. Stelter, B., & Arango, T. (2009, May 3). Losing popularity contest, MySpace tries a makeover. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/04/technology/companies/04myspace.html
135. Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181. doi:10.1037/h0046162
136. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265
137. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002). National Survey on Drug Use & Health: Detailed tables (Table 4.8a). Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
138. Sunstein, C. (2003). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
139. Swets, J. A. (1988, June 3). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293. doi:10.1126/science.3287615
140. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212. doi:10.2307/3033791
141. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.189
142. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60287-7
143. Thom, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis: An outline of a theory of models (D. H. Fowler, Trans.). Reading, MA: Benjamin. (Original work published 1972)
144. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286. doi:10.1037/h0070288
145. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Tindale, R. S., Davis, J. H., Vollrath, D. A., Nagao, D. H., & Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 438-449. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.438
147. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Raskinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
148. Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of the people. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 820-828. doi:10.1177/0146167296228005
149. Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
150. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
151. van de Kragt, A. J. C., Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1983). The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77, 112-122.
152. van der Maas, H. L. L., Kolstein, R., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Sudden transitions in attitudes. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 125-152. doi:10.1177/0049124103253773
153. Visser, P. S., Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 1-60). New York, NY: Academic Press.
154. Vogel, E. H., Castro, M. E., & Saavedra, M. A. (2004). Quantitative models of Pavlovian conditioning. Brain Research Bulletin, 63, 173-202. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.01.005
155. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York, NY: Norton.
156. Wiesenthal, D. L., Austrom, D., & Silverman, I. (1983). Diffusion of responsibility in charitable donations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 17-27. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0401_2
157. Wilensky, U. (1998). NetLogo segregation model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Segregation
158. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
159. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345. doi:10.1037/00332909.115.3.323
160. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.