Proteins involved in establishment and maintenance of imprinted methylation marks

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 227-239

  Strogantsev, Ruslan ^a   Ferguson Smith, Anne C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Imprinting; KAP1; ZFP57

Indexed keywords

DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 3A; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 3B; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 57;

ARTICLE; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EXCISION REPAIR; FERTILIZATION; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENOME IMPRINTING; GERM LINE; HUMAN; INNER CELL MASS; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; NONHUMAN; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIMORDIAL GERM CELL;

ANIMALS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENOMICS; FEMALE; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; GERM CELLS; HISTONES; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEINS; ZINC FINGERS;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84864298057     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/els018     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Li Y, Sasaki H. Genomic imprinting in mammals: its life cycle, molecular mechanisms and reprogramming. Cell Res 2011;21:466-73.
2. Ferguson-Smith AC. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:565-75.
3. Bartolomei MS, Ferguson-Smith AC. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold SpringHarb Perspect Biol 2011;3:1-17.
4. Edwards CA, Rens W, Clarke O, et al. The evolution of imprinting: chromosomal mapping of orthologues of mammalian imprinted domains in monotreme and marsupial mammals. BMC Evol Biol 2007;7:157.
5. McGrath J, Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 1984; 37:179-83.
6. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984;308:548-50.
7. Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 2004;428:860-4.
8. Cattanach BM, Kirk M. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 1985;315:496-8.
9. Mackay DJG, Temple IK. Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 1. AmJMed Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 2010; 154C:335-42.
10. Horsthemke B, Wagstaff J. Mechanisms of imprinting of the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A:2041-52.
11. Edwards CA, Ferguson-Smith AC. Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19: 281-9.
12. Reik W, Maher ER. Imprinting in clusters: lessons from Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. TrendsGenet (TIG) 1997; 13:330-4.
13. Hiura H, Sugawara A, Ogawa H, etal. A tripartite paternally methylated region within the Gpr1-Zdbf2 imprinted domain on mouse chromosome 1 identified by meDIP-on-chip. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:4929-45.
14. Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Schweifer N, etal. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997;389:745-9.
15. Thorvaldsen JL, Duran KL, Bartolomei MS. Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2. Genes Dev 1998;12: 3693-702.
16. Williamson CM, Turner MD, Ball ST, et al. Identification of an imprinting control region affecting the expression of all transcripts in the Gnas cluster. Nat Genet 2006;38: 350-5.
17. Yang T, Adamson TE, Resnick JL, et al. A mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting-centre mutations. Nat Genet 1998;19:25-31.
18. Fitzpatrick GV, Soloway PD, Higgins MJ. Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion of KvDMR1. Nat Genet 2002;32:426-31.
19. Lin S-P, Youngson N, Takada S, et al. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12. Nat Genet 2003;35:97-102.
20. Surani MA, Durcova-Hills G, Hajkova P, et al. Germ line, stem cells, and epigenetic reprogramming. Cold SpringHarb Symp Quant Biol 2008;73:9-15.
21. Ohinata Y, Payer B, O'Carroll D, et al. Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 2005; 436:207-13.
22. Saitou M, Barton SC, Surani MA. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature 2002; 418:293-300.
23. Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Develop 2002; 117:15-23.
24. Hajkova P, Jeffries SJ, Lee C, et al. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science 2010;329:78-82.
25. Hajkova P, Ancelin K, Waldmann T, et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature 2008;452:877-81.
26. Surani MA, Hajkova P. Epigenetic reprogramming of mouse germ cells toward totipotency. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010;75:211-8.
27. Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, et al. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev Biol 2002;241:172-82.
28. Kota SK, Feil R. Epigenetic transitions in germ cell development and meiosis. Dev Cell 2010;19:675-86.
29. Gonzalgo ML, Jones PA. Mutagenic and epigenetic effects of DNA methylation. Mutat Res 1997;386:107-18.
30. Smallwood SA, Tomizawa S-I, Krueger F, et al. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat Genet 2011;43:1-5.
31. Howlett SK, Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development 1991;113:119-27.
32. Gu T-P, Guo F, Yang H, et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011;477:606-10.
33. Wossidlo M, Nakamura T, Lepikhov K, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun 2011; 2:241.
34. Inoue A, Zhang Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science 2011;334:194.
35. Inoue A, Shen L, Dai Q, et al. Generation and replicationdependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res 2011;21:1670-6.
36. Ratnam S, Mertineit C, Ding F, et al. Dynamics of Dnmt1 methyltransferase expression and intracellular localization during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Dev Biol 2002;245:304-14.
37. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, et al. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 1999;99: 247-57.
38. Chédin F. The DNMT3 family of mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases. Prog Mol BiolTransl Sci 2011;101: 255-85.
39. Goll MG, Bestor TH. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Ann Rev Biochem 2005;74:481-514.
40. Wienholz BL, Kareta MS, Moarefi AH, et al. DNMT3L modulates significant and distinct flanking sequence preference for DNA methylation by DNMT3A and DNMT3B in vivo. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1001106.
41. Bourc'his D, Bestor TH. Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L. Nature 2004;431:96-9.
42. Bourc'his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, et al. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 2001;294: 2536-9.
43. Kato Y, Kaneda M, Hata K, et al. Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. HumMol Genet 2007;16:2272-80.
44. Jurkowska RZ, Anspach N, Urbanke C, et al. Formation of nucleoprotein filaments by mammalian DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in complex with regulator Dnmt3L. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:6656-63.
45. Jia D, Jurkowska RZ, Zhang X, et al. Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature 2007;449:248-51.
46. Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, et al. Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 2002;129: 1983-93.
47. Hirasawa R, Chiba H, Kaneda M, et al. Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev 2008;22:1607-16.
48. Lucifero D, La Salle S, Bourc'his D, et al. Coordinate regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during oogenesis. BMCDev Biol 2007;7:36.
49. Kaneda M, Okano M, Hata K, et al. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 2004;429:900-3.
50. Kaneda M, Hirasawa R, Chiba H, et al. Genetic evidence for Dnmt3a-dependent imprinting during oocyte growth obtained by conditional knockout with Zp3-Cre and complete exclusion of Dnmt3b by chimera formation. Genes Cells 2010;15:169-79.
51. Watanabe T, Tomizawa S-I, Mitsuya K, et al. Role for piRNAs and noncoding RNA in de novo DNA methylation of the imprinted mouse Rasgrf1 locus. Science 2011; 332:848-52.
52. Ferguson-Smith AC, Greally JM. Epigenetics: perceptive enzymes. Nature 2007;449:148-9.
53. Glass JL, Fazzari MJ, Ferguson-Smith AC, et al. CG dinucleotide periodicities recognized by the Dnmt3a-Dnmt3L complex are distinctive at retroelements and imprinted domains. Mamm Genome 2009;20:633-43.
54. Ooi SKT, Qiu C, Bernstein E, et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 2007;448:714-7.
55. Ciccone DN, Su H, Hevi S, et al. KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature 2009;461:415-8.
56. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, etal. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 2007;448:553-60.
57. Henckel A, Nakabayashi K, Sanz LA, et al. Histone methylation is mechanistically linked to DNA methylation at imprinting control regions in mammals. HumMol Genet 2009; 18:3375-83.
58. McEwen KR, Ferguson-Smith AC. Distinguishing epigenetic marks of developmental and imprinting regulation. Epigenet Chromatin 2010;3:2.
59. Chotalia M, Smallwood SA, Ruf N, et al. Transcription is required for establishment of germline methylation marks at imprinted genes. Genes Dev 2009;23:105-17.
60. Bastepe M, Fröhlich LF, Linglart A, et al. Deletion of the NESP55 differentially methylated region causes loss of maternal GNAS imprints and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib. Nat Genet 2005;37:25-7.
61. Buiting K, Lich C, Cottrell S, etal. A 5-kb imprinting center deletion in a family with Angelman syndrome reduces the shortest region of deletion overlap to 880 bp. Hum Genet 1999;105:665-6.
62. Dhayalan A, Rajavelu A, Rathert P, et al. The Dnmt3a PWWP domain reads histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation and guides DNA methylation. J Biol Chem 2010;285: 26114-20.
63. Keogh M-C, Kurdistani SK, Morris SA, et al. Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex. Cell 2005;123:593-605.
64. Carrozza MJ, Li B, Florens L, et al. Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 2005;123: 581-92.
65. Li X, Ito M, Zhou F, et al. A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev Cell 2008;15:547-57.
66. Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 1992;69:915-26.
67. Svedružić ŽM. Dnmt1 structure and function. ProgMol Biol Transl Sci 2011;101:221-54.
68. Jurkowska RZ, Jurkowski TP, Jeltsch A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Chem Bio Chem 2011;12:206-22.
69. Sharif J, Koseki H. Recruitment of Dnmt1 roles of the SRA protein Np95 (Uhrf1) and other factors. ProgMol BiolTransl Sci 2011;101:289-310.
70. Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 1993;366:362-5.
71. Howell CY, Bestor TH, Ding F, et al. Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell 2001;104:829-38.
72. Kurihara Y, Kawamura Y, Uchijima Y, et al. Maintenance of genomic methylation patterns during preimplantation development requires the somatic form of DNA methyltransferase. Dev Biol 2008;313:335-46.
73. Cirio MC, Ratnam S, Ding F, et al. Preimplantation expression of the somatic form of Dnmt1 suggests a role in the inheritance of genomic imprints. BMCDev Biol 2008;8:9.
74. Borowczyk E, Mohan KN, D'Aiuto L, et al. Identification of a region of the DNMT1 methyltransferase that regulates the maintenance of genomic imprints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:20806-11.
75. Branco MR, Oda M, Reik W. Safeguarding parental identity: Dnmt1 maintains imprints during epigenetic reprogramming in early embryogenesis. Genes Dev 2008;22: 1567-71.
76. Bortvin A, Goodheart M, Liao M, et al. Dppa3/Pgc7/stella is a maternal factor and is not required for germ cell specification in mice. BMCDev Biol 2004;4:2.
77. Payer B, Saitou M, Barton SC, et al. Stella is a maternal effect gene required for normal early development in mice. Curr Biol 2003;13:2110-7.
78. Nakamura T, Arai Y, Umehara H, et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:64-71.
79. Huang Y, Pastor WA, Shen Y, et al. The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PloS one 2010;5:e8888.
80. Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011;333:1300-3.
81. Li X, Leder P. Identifying genes preferentially expressed in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. BMCCell Biol 2007; 8:37.
82. Mackay DJG, Callaway JLA, Marks SM, et al. Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57. Nat Genet 2008;40:949-51.
83. Quenneville S, Verde G, Corsinotti A, et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol Cell 2011;44:361-72.
84. Zuo X, Sheng J, Lau H-T, et al. Zinc finger protein ZFP57 requires its co-factor to recruit DNA methyltransferases and maintains DNA methylation imprint in embryonic stem cells via its transcriptional repression domain. J Biol Chem 2012;287:2107-18.
85. Looman C, Abrink M, Mark C, et al. KRAB zinc finger proteins: an analysis of the molecular mechanisms governing their increase in numbers and complexity during evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2002;19:2118-30.
86. Schultz DC, Ayyanathan K, Negorev D, et al. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev 2002;16:919-32.
87. Underhill C, Qutob MS, Yee SP, et al. A novel nuclear receptor corepressor complex, N-CoR, contains components of the mammalian SWI/SNF complex and the corepressor KAP-1. J Biol Chem 2000;275:40463-70.
88. Lechner MS, Schultz DC, Negorev D, etal. The mammalian heterochromatin protein 1 binds diverse nuclear proteins through a common motif that targets the chromoshadow domain. BiochemBiophysResCommun 2005;331:929-37.
89. Fazzio TG, Huff JT, Panning B. An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity. Cell 2008;134:162-74.
90. Cammas F, Mark M, Dollé P, et al. Mice lacking the transcriptional corepressor TIF1beta are defective in early postimplantation development. Development 2000;127:2955-63.
91. Hu G, Kim J, Xu Q, et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. Genes Dev 2009;23:837-48.
92. Messerschmidt DM, de Vries W, Ito M, et al. Trim28 is required for epigenetic stability during oocyte to embryo transition. Science 2012;335:1499-502.
93. Rowe HM, Jakobsson J, Mesnard D, et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature 2010;463:237-40.
94. Wolf D, Goff SP. Embryonic stem cells use ZFP809 to silence retroviral DNAs. Nature 2009;458:1201-4.
95. Matsui T, Leung D, Miyashita H, et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 2010;464:927-31.
96. Cammas F, Herzog M, Lerouge T, et al. Association of the transcriptional corepressor TIF1beta with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1): an essential role for progression through differentiation. Genes Dev 2004;18:2147-60.
97. Riclet R, Chendeb M, Vonesch J-L, et al. Disruption of the interaction between transcriptional intermediary factor 1{beta} and heterochromatin protein 1 leads to a switch from DNA hyper- to hypomethylation and H3K9 to H3K27 trimethylation on the MEST promoter correlating with gene reactivation. Mol Biol Cell 2009;20:296-305.
98. Wu M-Y, Tsai T-F, Beaudet AL. Deficiency of Rbbp1/Arid4a and Rbbp1l1/Arid4b alters epigenetic modifications and suppresses an imprinting defect in the PWS/AS domain. GenesDev 2006;20:2859-70.
99. Reese KJ, Lin S, Verona RI, et al. Maintenance of paternal methylation and repression of the imprinted H19 gene requires MBD3. PLoS Genet 2007;3:e137.
100. Ferrón SR, Charalambous M, Radford E, etal. Postnatal loss of Dlk1 imprinting in stem cells and niche astrocytes regulates neurogenesis. Nature 2011;475:381-5.
101. Kobayashi H, Sakurai T, Sato S, et al. Imprinted DNA methylation reprogramming during early mouse embryogenesis at the Gpr1-Zdbf2 locus is linked to long cis-intergenic transcription. FEBS Lett 2012;2:1-7.
102. Dickson J, Gowher H, Strogantsev R, et al. VEZF1 elements mediate protection from DNA methylation. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1000804.
103. Brandeis M, Frank D, Keshet I, et al. Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature 1994;371: 435-8.
104. Fan S, Fang F, Zhang X, et al. Putative zinc finger protein binding sites are over-represented in the boundaries of methylation-resistant CpG islands in the human genome. PloS One 2007;2:e1184.
105. Macleod D, Charlton J, Mullins J, et al. Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev 1994;8:2282-92.
106. Thomson JP, Skene PJ, Selfridge J, et al. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature 2010;464:1082-6.
107. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev 2011;25:1010-22.
108. Illingworth RS, Bird AP. CpG islands-'a rough guide'. FEBS Lett 2009;583:1713-20.
109. Vaissière T, Sawan C, Herceg Z. Epigenetic interplay between histone modifications and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Mutat Res 2008;659:40-8.
110. Fuks F. DNA methylation and histone modifications: teaming up to silence genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005;15: 490-5.
111. Stancheva I. Caught in conspiracy: cooperation between DNA methylation and histone H3K9 methylation in the establishment and maintenance of heterochromatin. Biochem Cell Biol 2005;83:385-95.
112. Zhao Q, Rank G, Tan YT, etal. PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Nat StructMol Biol 2009;16:304-11.
113. Li H, Rauch T, Chen Z-X, et al. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 and the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A interact directly and localize to promoters silenced in cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2006;281:19489-500.
114. Arnaud P, Hata K, Kaneda M, et al. Stochastic imprinting in the progeny of Dnmt3L-/- females. HumMol Genet 2006; 15:589-98.