Measurable like temperature or mereological like flocking? On the nature of personality traits

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 451-459

  Cramer, Angélique O J ^a   van der Sluis, Sophie ^a,b   Noordhof, Arjen ^a   Wichers, Marieke ^c   Geschwind, Nicole ^c,d   Aggen, Steven H ^e,f   Kendler, Kenneth S ^e,f   Borsboom, Denny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Latent trait perspective; Network models; Personality traits

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864297190     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.1879     Document Type: Letter

References (116)

1. Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. L. (1999). The diameter of the world wide web. Nature, 401, 130-131.
2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
3. Allport, G. W. (1946). Personalistic psychology as science: A reply. Psychological Review, 53, 132-135.
4. Allport, G. A. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
5. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A., Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2010). Personality psychology and economics. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5500. Available at SSRN:
6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure. European Journal of Personality, 19, 5-24.
7. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.
8. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO-PI-R self- and observer reports. European Journal of Personality, 24, 278-289.
9. Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J. A., Hartung, F.-M., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., ... Wrzus, C. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90-107.
10. Bartholomew, D. J. (2004). Measuring intelligence: Facts and fallacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
12. Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., Staubach, M., Schmitt, M. (2011). Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice-related information. European Journal of Personality, 25, 386-397.
13. Blum, G. S., & Miller, D. R. (1952). Exploring the psychoanalytic theory of the "oral character." Journal of Personality, 20, 287-304.
14. Borsboom, D. (2008). Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1089-1108.
15. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY US: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Chen, C., Chen, C., Moyzis, R., Stern, H., He, Q., Li, H., ... Dong, Q. (2011). Contributions of dopamine-related genes and environmental factors to highly sensitive personality: A multi-step neuronal system-level approach. PLoS One, 6(7), 1-9. e21636
20. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd edn, pp. 265-286). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Cramer, A. O. J. (2012). Why the item "23+1" is not in a depression questionnaire: Validity from a network perspective. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 10, 50-54.
22. Cramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., ... Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search for equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414-431.
23. Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137-193.
24. Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the five-factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285-1302.
25. Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2012). Personality maturation as improved emotion regulation. Manuscript submitted for review.
26. Ellis, A. (1987). The impossibility of achieving consistently good mental health. American Psychologist, 42, 364-375.
27. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Qgraph: Network representations of relationships in data. R package version 1.0.0.
28. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: Thomas.
29. Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
30. Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83-87.
31. Fleeson, W. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In K. Deaux, & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 33-63). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Fleeson, W., & Jolley, S. (2006). A proposed theory of the adult development of intraindividual variability in trait-manifesting behavior. In D. Mroczek, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 41-59). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
33. Foster, E. M. (2010). Causal influence and developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1454-1480.
34. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
35. Friedman, H. S. (2011). The longevity project: Surprising discoveries for health and long life from the landmark eight-decade study. New York: Penguin.
36. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21, 1129-1164.
37. Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A Neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
38. Furr, R. M. (2009a). The study of behaviour in personality psychology: Meaning, importance, and measurement. European Journal of Personality, 23, 437-453.
39. Furr, R. M. (2009b). Profile analysis in person-situation integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 196-207.
40. Gere, J., & Schimmack, U. (2011). A multi-occasion multi-rater model of affective dispositions and affective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 931-945.
41. Grafton, B., Ang, C., & MacLeod, C. (2012). Always look on the bright side of life: The attentional basis of positive affectivity. European Journal of Personality, 26, 133-144.
42. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd edn). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Greenberg, A. S., & Bailey, J. M. (1993). Do biological explanations of homosexuality have moral, legal, or policy implications? Journal of Sex Research, 30, 245-251.
44. Guttman, L., & Levy, S. (1991). Two structural laws for intelligence tests. Intelligence, 15, 79-103.
45. Hartman, C., & Benes, B. (2006). Autonomous boids. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 17, 199-206.
46. Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
47. Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.469
48. Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523-1543.
49. Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1556-1565.
50. Kendler, K. S. (2005). Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 433-440.
51. Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 52-59.
52. Kievit, R. A., Romeijn, J.-W., Waldorp, L. J., Wicherts, J. M., Scholte, S., & Borsboom, D. (2011). Modeling mind and matter: Reductionism and psychological measurement in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 139-157.
53. Lee, J. J. (2012). Correlation and causation in the study of personality. European Journal of Personality, 26, 372-390.
54. Lord, F. M. (1953). The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-549.
55. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56. van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842-861.
57. Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107-127.
58. Mathews, A. (2012). Personality and information processing: We are what we encode. European Journal of Personality, 26, 158-163.
59. Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577-605.
61. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1984). Emerging lives, enduring dispositions: Personality in adulthood. Boston: Little, Brown.
62. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1992). Discriminant validity of NEO-PI-R facets. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 229-237.
63. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9, 231-252.
64. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
65. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008a). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273-294). Los Angeles: Sage.
66. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008b). The Five-Factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd edn, pp. 159-181). New York: Guilford.
67. McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100-117.
68. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. McDonald, R. P. (2003). Behavior domains in theory and in practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 49, 212-230.
70. McNiel, J. M., & Fleeson, W. (2006). The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 529-550.
71. Meehl, P. E. (1945). The dynamics of "structured" personalitytests. Journal of ClinicalPsychology, 1, 296-303.
72. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
73. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13-103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
74. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
75. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
76. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1994). Personality Psychology Has Two Goals: Must It Be Two Fields? Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 5, 156-158.
77. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
78. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201-218.
79. de Moor, M. H., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Krueger, R. F., de Geus, E. J., Toshiko, T., et al. (in press). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality. Molecular Psychiatry.
80. Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Funder, D. C., Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2010). On the contextual independence of personality: Teachers' assessments predict directly observed behavior after four decades. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 327-334.
81. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32, 245-251.
82. Ozer, D. J. (1986). Consistency in personality: A methodological framework. New York.
83. Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Forsterling, F., & Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 413-433.
84. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Perugini, M., Conner, M., & O'Gorman, R. (2011). Automatic activation of individual differences: A test of the gatekeeper model in the domain of spontaneous helping. European Journal of Personality, 25, 465-476.
86. Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113.
87. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton & Co.
88. Quek, M., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2007). Testing neural network models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 700-706.
89. Read, S. J., Monroe, B. M., Brownstein, A. L., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61-92.
90. Robins, R. W., John, O. P., & Caspi, A. (1994). Major dimensions of personality in early adolescence: The Big Five and beyond. In C. F. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 267-291). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
91. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th edn, pp. 105-176). New York: Wiley.
92. Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 165-196.
93. Schimmack, U. (2010). What multi-method data tell us about construct validity. European Journal of Personality, 24, 241-257.
94. Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98, 1-21.
95. Shevlin, M., Dorahy, M., Adamson, G., & Murphy, J. (2007). Subtypes of borderline personality disorder, associated clinical disorders and stressful life-events: A latent class analysis based on the British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 273-281.
96. Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., Widiger, T. A., Livesley, W. J., & Siever, L. (2002). The borderline diagnosis: I. Psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structures. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 936-950.
97. Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 79-98.
98. Steyer, R., Geiser, C., & Fiege, C. (in press). Latent state-trait models. In H. Coooer (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. American Psychological Association.
99. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389-408.
100. Stout, W. F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionalityassessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55, 293-325.
101. Sutin, A. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Uda, M., Ferrucci, L., Schlessinger, D., & Terracciano, A. (2010). Personality and metabolic syndrome. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 32, 513-519.
102. Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence and assessment. In D. Cicchetti, & W. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (pp. 10-35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
103. Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Wilcox, K. J., Segal, N. L., & Rich, S. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1031-1039.
104. Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006). Personality plasticity after age 30. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 999-1009.
105. Terracciano, A., Esko, T., Sutin, A. R., De Moor, M. H. M., Meirelles, O., Zhu, G., et al. (2011). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants in CTNNA2 associated with excitement-seeking. TranslationalPsychiatry, 1, e49.
106. Terracciano, A., Sanna, S., Uda, M., Deiana, B., Usala, G., Busonero, F., et al. (2010a). Genome-wide association scan for five major dimensions of personality. MolecularPsychiatry, 15, 647-656.
107. Terracciano, A., Sutin, A. R., McCrae, R. R., Deiana, B., Ferrucci, L., Schlessinger, D., et al. (2009). Facets of personality linked to underweight and overweight. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 682-689.
108. Terracciano, A., Tanaka, T., Sutin, A. R., Sanna, S., Deiana, B., Lai, S., et al. (2010b). Genome-wide association scan of trait depression. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 811-817.
109. Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32, 425-443.
110. Turkheimer, E. (1998). Heritability and biological explanation. Psychological Review, 105, 782-791.
111. Vassend, O., & Skrondal, A. (1997). Validation of the NEO Personality Inventory and the five-factor model: Can findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be reconciled? European Journal of Personality, 11, 147-166.
112. Vazquez, A., Flammini, A., Maritan, A., & Vespignani, A. (2003). Modeling of protein interaction networks. Complexus, 1, 38-44.
113. Wagner, G. P. (2001). The character concept in evolutionary biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
114. Wiggins, J. S. (1984). Cattell's system from the perspective of mainstream personality theory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 176-190.
115. Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 3-21.
116. Wood, D., & Hensler, M. (2011). How a functionalist understanding of behavior can explain trait variation and covariation without the use of latent factors. Retrieved from