Modeling mind and matter: Reductionism and psychological measurement in cognitive neuroscience

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 139-157

  Kievit, Rogier A ^a   Romeijn, Jan Willem ^b   Waldorp, Lourens J ^a   Wicherts, Jelte M ^a   Scholte, H Steven ^a   Borsboom, Denny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958703447     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.567962     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aydede, M. (2000). On the type/token relation of mental representations. Facta Philosophica, 2, 23-49.
2. Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are Emotions Natural Kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58.
3. Barrett, L. F. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 326-339.
4. Bassett, D., & Bullmore, E. (2006), Small-worlds brain networks. Neuroscientist, 12, 512-523.
5. Bechtel,W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
6. Bechtel, W., & Mundale, J. (1999). Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science, 66, 175-207.
7. Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction. The new wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bock, R. D., & Kolakowski, D. F. (1973). Further evidence of sexlinked major gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, l-14.
9. Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97, 303-352.
10. Chalmers, D. J. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244-256). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Chiao, J. Y., & Cheon, B. K. (2010). The weirdest brains in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 88-90.
12. Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67-90.
13. Claeskens, G., & Hjort, N. L. (2008). Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Coan, J. A. (2010). Emergent ghosts of the emotion machine. Emotion Review, 2, 274-285.
15. Congdon, P. (2003). Applied Bayesian modelling. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27-51.
17. Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: interpretation and modeling Implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, 1, 7-17.
18. Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008) Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203-121.
19. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155-174.
20. Fischer, H., Wright, C. I., Whalen, P. J., McInerney, S. C., Shin, L. M., & Rauch, S. R. (2003). Brain habituation during repeated exposure to fearful and neutral faces: A functional MRI study. Brain Research Bulletin, 59, 387-392.
21. Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences (Or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97-115.
22. Frege, G. (1956). The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind, New Series, 65, 289-311.
23. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1, 49-72.
24. Haig, B. D. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis, theory generation, and scientific method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 303-329.
25. Hamaker, E. L., Nesselroade, J. R.,& Molenaar, P. C.M. (2007). The integrated trait- state model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 295-315.
26. Handwerker, D. A., Ollinger, J. M., & D'Esposito, M. (2004). Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. NeuroImage, 21, 1639-1651.
27. Hardcastle, V. G. (1997).When a pain is not. Journal of Philosophy, 94, 381-390.
28. Heils, A., Teufel, A., Petri, S., Stober, G., Riederer, P., Bengel, D., et al. (1996). Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. Journal of Neurochemistry, 66, 2621-2624.
29. Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
30. Horgan, T. (1993). From supervenience to superdupervenience: Meeting the demands of a material world. Mind, 102, 555-586.
31. Just, M. A., Cherkassky, V. L. Aryal, S. and Mitchell T. M (2010). A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PLoS One, 5, e8622
32. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
33. Karlin S. (1983, April 20). 11th R.A. FisherMemorial Lecture, Royal Society.
34. Kendler, K.S. (2005). "A gene for . . .": The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1243-1252.
35. Kievit, R. A., van Rooijen, H., Wicherts, J., Scholte, H. S., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2011). If neuro g is the answer, what is the question? Manuscript submitted for publication.
36. Kim, J. (1987). "Strong" and "global" supervenience revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48, 315-326.
37. Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Kriegeskorte, N. (2010). Interpreting brain images: Reflections on an adolescent field. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 475-476.
39. Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S., & Baker, C. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 535-540.
40. Krukow, K., Nielsen, M. & Sassone, V. (2008). Trust models in ubiquitous computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 3781-3793.
41. Lamme, V. A. F. (2004). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 494-502.
42. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
43. Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 556-567.
44. Lewis, D. (1994). Human supervenience debugged. Mind, New Series, 103, 473-490.
45. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Augelman, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
46. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948).On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
47. McCauley, R. N., & Bechtel, W. (2001). Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory and Psychology, 11, 736-760.
48. Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1-25.
49. Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245-264.
50. Mars, R. B., Shea, N. J., Kolling, N., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2010). Model-based analyses: Promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication.
51. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596.
52. McMullin, E. (1983). Values in science. In P. Asquith & T. Nickles (Eds.), Philosophy of Science Association 1982, Vol. 2 (pp. 3-25). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
53. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
54. Miller, G. A. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716-743.
55. Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549-587.
56. Pigliucci, M. (2007). Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution, 61, 2743-2749.
57. Place, U. T. (1999). Token- versus type-identity physicalism. Anthropology and Philosophy, 3, 21-31.
58. Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59-63.
59. Poline, J.-B., Thirion, B., Roche A., & Meriaux, S. (2010). Intersubject variability in fMRI data: Causes, consequences and related analysis strategies. In S. J. Hanson & M. Bunzl (Eds.), Foundational issues in human brain mapping (pp. 173-191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Posthuma, D., Baaŕe, W. F. C., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Kahn, R. S., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. C. (2003). Genetic correlations between brain volumes and the WAIS-III dimensions of verbal comprehension, working memory, perceptual organization, and processing speed. Twin Research, 6, 131-139.
61. Psillos, S. (2004). A glimpse of the secret connexion: Harmonizing mechanisms with counterfactuals. Perspectives on Science, 12, 288-319.
62. Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435, 1102-1107.
63. Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
64. Rowlands, M. (1992). Externalism and token-token identity. Philosophia, 22, 359-375.
65. Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistics and causal inference: Comment: Which ifs have causal answers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961-962.
66. Schleim, S., & Roiser, J. P. (2009). fMRI in translation: The challenges facing real-world applications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 63.
67. Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
68. Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., Evans, A., Rapoport, J., & Giedd, J. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676-679.
69. van den Heuvel, M. P., Stam, C. J., Kahn, R. S.,& Hulshoff Pol,H. E. (2009). Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7619-7624.
70. van der Maas,H. L. J., Molenaar, D., Maris, G., Kievit, R. A., and Borsboom, D. (in press). Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: On the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. Psychological Review. doi: 10.1037/a0022749.
71. van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M. & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842-861.
72. Watts, D. J.,& Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of "smallworld" networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
73. Woodward, J. (2002). What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science, 69, 366-377.
74. Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: Building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 489-496.