Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Spanish dental schools

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Castillo de Oyagüe, Raquel ^a   Lynch, Christopher ^b   McConnell, Robert ^c   Wilson, Nairn ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aesthetic dentistry; Composite restoration; Dental education; Teaching program; Undergraduate dental student

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN;

ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; E-MAIL; HUMAN; MOISTURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPAIN; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; SPAIN;

EID: 84863898500     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17656     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gilmour AS, Evans P, Addy LD. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth. Br Dent J. 2007;202:32.
2. Christensen GJ. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:201-203.
3. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH. Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:619-625.
4. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent. 1994;22:33-43.
5. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481-508.
6. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23:2-8.
7. Watts DC, el Mowafy OM, Grant AA. Fracture resistance of lower molars with Class 1 composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 1987;3:261-264.
8. Sheth JJ, Fuller JL, Jensen ME. Cuspal deformation and fracture resistance of teeth with dentin adhesives and composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:560-569.
9. Christensen GJ. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:1757-1759.
10. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. The cracked tooth syndrome. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002;68:470-475.
11. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH. Trends in the placement of posterior composites in dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2007;71:430-434.
12. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH. Teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in undergraduate dental schools in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10:38-43.
13. Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Trends in dental education in the Persian Gulf-an example from Iran: contemporary placement of posterior composites. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2009;17:182-187.
14. Wilson NH, Mjör IA. The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools. J Dent. 2000;28:15-21.
15. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Hannigan A, Wilson NH. Teaching the use of resin composites in Canadian dental schools: how do current educational practices compare with North American trends? J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:321.
16. Gordan V V, Mjör IA, Veiga Filho LC, Ritter AV. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:735-740.
17. Fukushima M, Iwaku M, Setcos JC, Wilson NH, Mjör IA. Teaching of posterior composite restorations in Japanese dental schools. Int Dent J. 2000;50:407-411.
18. Hayashi M, Seow LL, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Teaching of posterior composites in dental schools in Japan. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:292-298.
19. Sanz M. Dental education and the Bologna Process. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003;7:143-146.
20. Lynch CD, Shortall AC, Stewardson D, Tomson PL, Burke FJ. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers. Br Dent J. 2007;203:183-187.
21. Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009;34:11-17.
22. Roeters JJ, Shortall AC, Opdam NJ. Can a single composite resin serve all purposes? Br Dent J. 2005;199:73-79.
23. Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Teaching Class I and Class II direct composite restorations: results of a survey of dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:1415-1421.
24. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:347-352.
25. Müllejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28:122-126.
26. Sidelsky H. Resin composite contours. Br Dent J. 2010;208:395-401.
27. Keogh P, Ray NJ, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Hannigan A. Surface microhardness of a resin composite exposed to a "first-generation" LED curing lamp, in vitro. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12:177-180.
28. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PM. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Int Endod J. 2009;42:632-638.