Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools

Quintessence International

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 735-740

  Gordan, Valeria V ^a,e   Mjör, Ivar A ^a   Da Veiga Filho, Luis Carlos ^b   Ritter, Andre V ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF LONDRINA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^e Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Class I and Class II restorations; Dental school curriculum; Resin based composite

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRICULUM; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG CONTRAINDICATION; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; EUROPE; FEE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAPAN; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; PHILOSOPHY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TEACHING; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BRAZIL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CURRICULUM; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; EUROPE; FEES, DENTAL; HUMANS; JAPAN; NORTH AMERICA; PHILOSOPHY, DENTAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; STATISTICS; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034328441     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Phillips RW, Lutz F. Council on dental materials, instruments, and equipment: Status report on posterior composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:74-76.
2. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restorations of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995; 7:228-232.
3. Mjör IA. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:53-57.
4. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent 1998;65:27-33.
5. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:257-262.
6. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM, Sockwell CL. Tooth-colored restorations for Classes I, II, and VI cavity preparations. In: Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR (eds). The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1995:586-625.
7. Hilton TJ. Direct posterior composite restorations. In: Schwartz RS, Summit JB, Robbins JW (eds). Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:207-228.
8. Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Teaching Class I and Class II direct composite restorations: Results of a survey of dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1415-1421.
9. Fukushima M, Iwaku M, Setcos JC, Wilson NHF, Mjör IA. Teaching of posterior composite restorations in Japanese dental schools [abstract 1633]. J Dent Res 1998;77:836.
10. Wilson NHF, Mjör IA. The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools. J Dent 2000;28:15-21.
11. Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990;69:861-864.
12. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
13. Schwartz J, Garcea I, Gordan VV, Söderholm K-J. Relation between filler particle size and wear rate [abstr 1034]. J Dent Res 1999;78:235.
14. Nathoo SA, Gaffar A. A study on dental stains induced by antibacterial agents and rational approaches for bleaching dental stains. Adv Dent Res 1994;9:462-470.
15. Felton DA, Cox CF, Odom M, Kanoy BE. Pulpal response to chemically cured and experimental light-cured glass ionomer cavity liners. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:704-712.
16. Torstenson B. Pulpal reaction to a dental adhesive in deep human cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:172-176.
17. Kitasako Y, Inokoshi S, Fujitami M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Short term reaction of exposed monkey pulp beneath adhesive resins. Oper Dent 1998;23:308-317.
18. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Moorhead JA. Amalgam restorations: Post-operative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Oper Dent 1999;24:377-383.
19. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vazquez OD. Post-operative sensitivity of an experimental resin system [abstr 1739]. J Dent Res 2000;79:361.
20. Christensen GJ. Alternatives for the restoration of posterior teeth. Int Dent J 1989;39:155-161.
21. Herrin HK, Harrison JL, Von der Lehr W. The status of posterior composites in the dental curriculum. J Dent Educ 1987;51:252-253.
22. Burke FT. The teaching of posterior composites: Views of recent UK graduates. J Dent 1989;17:S34-S39.
23. Wander PA. A posterior composite teaching programme for the postgraduate. J Dent 1989;17:S40-S41.
24. Heymann HO. A posterior composite teaching programme for the undergraduate. J Dent Suppl 1989;17:42-46.
25. Wilson NHF, Setcos JC. The teaching of posterior composites: A worldwide survey. J Dent Suppl 1989;17:29-33.