A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design

Quintessence International

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 347-352

  Duncalf, William V ^a   Wilson, Nairn H F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Class II restoration; Marginal adaptation; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DISPERSALLOY; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH CERVIX; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034188260     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Use survey-1995. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1995; 19(10):4.
2. Dunn SM, Wilson NHF, Gainsford ID. Current material and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. I. Silver amalgam. Int Dent J 1997;47:123-136.
3. Mjör IA, Burke FTJ, Wilson NHF. The relative cost of different restorations in the U.K. Br Dent J 1997;182:286-289.
4. Robinson AD. The life of a filling. Br Dent J 1971;130: 206-208.
5. Allen DN. A longitudinal study of dental restorations. Br Dent J 1987;143:87-89.
6. Markley MR. Silver amalgam. Oper Dent 1984;9:10-25.
7. Mjör IA, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990;40:11-17.
8. Leader SA. Direct acrylic fillings. Br Dent J 1948;84: 214-215.
9. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Classification of composites. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the Art on Direct Posterior Filling Materials and Dentine Bonding. Leuven, Belgium: Van der Poorten, 1993;77-105.
10. Burke FTJ, McCaughey AD. The four generations of dentine bonding. Am J Dent 1995;8:88-92.
11. Smith DC. General discussion. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds). State of the Art on Direct Posterior Filling Materials and Dentine Bonding. Leuven, Belgium: Van der Poorten, 1993:77-105.
12. Jensen ME, Chan DCN. Polymerisation shrinkage and microleakage. In: Vanherle G, Smith DG (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. The Netherlands: Peter Szulo, 1985;243-263.
13. Fédération Dentaire Internationale, World Dental Federation, World Health Organization. Consensus Statement on Dental Amalgam. FDI World 1995:9-10.
14. Wilson NHF, Dunn SM, Gainsford ID. Current material and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. I. Composite resin. Int Dent J 1997;47:185-193.
15. Watts D. Dental materials - Review. J Dent 1999;24:425-427.
16. Lui JL, Masutani S, Setcos JC, Lutz F, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Marginal quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:49-54.
17. Lutz F, Imfeld F, Barbakow F, Iselin W. Optimizing the marginal adaptation of MOD composite restorations. In: Vanherle G, Smith DG (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. The Netherlands: Peter Szulo, 1985:405-419.
18. Hinoura K, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Cavity design and placement techniques for Class II composites. Oper Dent 1988;13:12-19.
19. Ogden AR. Porosity in composite resins - An Achilles heel? J Dent 1985;13:331-340.
20. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 1247:68-72.