Replication timing and its emergence from stochastic processes

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 374-381

  Bechhoefer, John ^a   Rhind, Nicholas ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA replication timing; MCM; ORC; Replication initiation; Stochastic models

Indexed keywords

DNA;

AGING; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOMATIC CELL; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84863872155     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.011     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Baker T.A., Wickner S.H. Genetics and enzymology of DNA replication in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1992, 26:447-477.
2. Masai H., et al. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how?. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79:89-130.
3. Remus D., et al. Concerted loading of Mcm2-7 double hexamers around DNA during DNA replication origin licensing. Cell 2009, 139:719-730.
4. Evrin C., et al. A double-hexameric MCM2-7 complex is loaded onto origin DNA during licensing of eukaryotic DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:20240-20245.
5. Labib K. How do Cdc7 and cyclin-dependent kinases trigger the initiation of chromosome replication in eukaryotic cells?. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:1208-1219.
6. Herrick J., et al. Kinetic model of DNA replication in eukaryotic organisms. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 320:741-750.
7. Jun S., Bechhoefer J. Nucleation and growth in one dimension. II. Application to DNA replication kinetics. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 71:011909.
8. Yang S.C., et al. Modeling genome-wide replication kinetics reveals a mechanism for regulation of replication timing. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:404.
9. Hamlin J.L., et al. A revisionist replicon model for higher eukaryotic genomes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 105:321-329.
10. Norio P., et al. Progressive activation of DNA replication initiation in large domains of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus during B cell development. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:575-587.
11. Gauthier M.G., et al. Modeling inhomogeneous DNA replication kinetics. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e32053.
12. Huberman J.A., Riggs A.D. On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 32:327-341.
13. Blow J.J., et al. Replication origins in Xenopus egg extract are 5-15 kilobases apart and are activated in clusters that fire at different times. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152:15-25.
14. Pasero P., et al. Single-molecule analysis reveals clustering and epigenetic regulation of replication origins at the yeast rDNA locus. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:2479-2484.
15. Shaw A., et al. S-phase progression in mammalian cells: modelling the influence of nuclear organization. Chromosome Res. 2010, 18:163-178.
16. Audit B., et al. Open chromatin encoded in DNA sequence is the signature of 'master' replication origins in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:6064-6075.
17. Guilbaud G., et al. Evidence for sequential and increasing activation of replication origins along replication timing gradients in the human genome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002322.
18. Rhind N., et al. Reconciling stochastic origin firing with defined replication timing. Chromosome Res. 2010, 18:35-43.
19. Jun S., et al. Persistence length of chromatin determines origin spacing in Xenopus early-embryo DNA replication: quantitative comparisons between theory and experiment. Cell Cycle 2004, 3:223-229.
20. McCune H.J., et al. The temporal program of chromosome replication: genomewide replication in clb5Δ Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008, 180:1833-1847.
21. Patel P.K., et al. DNA replication origins fire stochastically in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:308-316.
22. Czajkowsky D.M., et al. DNA combing reveals intrinsic temporal disorder in the replication of yeast chromosome VI. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 375:12-19.
23. Patel P.K., et al. The Hsk1(Cdc7) replication kinase regulates origin efficiency. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:5550-5558.
24. Mantiero D., et al. Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast. EMBO J. 2011, 30:4805-4814.
25. Wu P.Y., Nurse P. Establishing the program of origin firing during S phase in fission yeast. Cell 2009, 136:852-864.
26. Tanaka S., et al. Origin association of sld3, sld7, and cdc45 proteins is a key step for determination of origin-firing timing. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:2055-2063.
27. Spiesser T.W., et al. A model for the spatiotemporal organization of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2009, 282:25-35.
28. de Moura A.P., et al. Mathematical modelling of whole chromosome replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:5623-5633.
29. Luo H., et al. Genome-wide estimation of firing efficiencies of origins of DNA replication from time-course copy number variation data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:247.
30. Lygeros J., et al. Stochastic hybrid modeling of DNA replication across a complete genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:12295-12300.
31. Koutroumpas K., Lygeros J. Modeling and analysis of DNA replication. Automatica 2011, 47:1156-1164.
32. Raghuraman M.K., Brewer B.J. Molecular analysis of the replication program in unicellular model organisms. Chromosome Res. 2010, 18:19-34.
33. Hayano M., et al. Mrc1 marks early-firing origins and coordinates timing and efficiency of initiation in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:2380-2391.
34. Knott S.R., et al. Forkhead transcription factors establish origin timing and long-range clustering in S. cerevisiae. Cell 2012, 148:99-111.
35. Herrick J., et al. Replication fork density increases during DNA synthesis in X. laevis egg extracts. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300:1133-1142.
36. Lucas I., et al. Mechanisms ensuring rapid and complete DNA replication despite random initiation in Xenopus early embryos. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 296:769-786.
37. Labit H., et al. DNA replication timing is deterministic at the level of chromosomal domains but stochastic at the level of replicons in Xenopus egg extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:5623-5634.
38. Goldar A., et al. A dynamic stochastic model for DNA replication initiation in early embryos. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2919.
39. Gauthier M.G., Bechhoefer J. Control of DNA replication by anomalous reaction-diffusion kinetics. Phys. Rev.Lett. 2009, 102:158104.
40. Harland R.M., Laskey R.A. Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis. Cell 1980, 21:761-771.
41. Hyrien O., Mechali M. Chromosomal replication initiates and terminates at random sequences but at regular intervals in the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus early embryos. EMBO J. 1993, 12:4511-4520.
42. Yang S.C., Bechhoefer J. How Xenopus laevis embryos replicate reliably: investigating the random-completion problem. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 78:041917.
43. Graham C.F. The regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis in multinucleate frog eggs. J. Cell Sci. 1966, 1:363-374.
44. Goldar A., et al. Universal temporal profile of replication origin activation in eukaryotes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5899.
45. Blumenthal A.B., et al. The units of DNA replication in Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1974, 38:205-223.
46. Lima-de-Faria A., Jaworska H. Late DNA synthesis in heterochromatin. Nature 1968, 217:138-142.
47. Gilbert N., et al. Chromatin architecture of the human genome: gene-rich domains are enriched in open chromatin fibers. Cell 2004, 118:555-566.
48. Schwaiger M., Schubeler D. A question of timing: emerging links between transcription and replication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16:177-183.
49. MacAlpine D.M., et al. Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:3094-3105.
50. Hiratani I., et al. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect: part II. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2009, 19:142-149.
51. Lieberman-Aiden E., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
52. Ryba T., et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 2010, 20:761-770.
53. Hayashi M.T., Masukata H. Regulation of DNA replication by chromatin structures: accessibility and recruitment. Chromosoma 2011, 120:39-46.
54. Lebofsky R., et al. DNA replication origin interference increases the spacing between initiation events in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17:5337-5345.
55. Cayrou C., et al. Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1438-1449.
56. Wong P.G., et al. Cdc45 limits replicon usage from a low density of preRCs in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17533.
57. Krasinska L., et al. Cdk1 and Cdk2 activity levels determine the efficiency of replication origin firing in Xenopus. EMBO J. 2008, 27:758-769.
58. Katsuno Y., et al. Cyclin A-Cdk1 regulates the origin firing program in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:3184-3189.
59. Thomson A.M., et al. Replication factory activation can be decoupled from the replication timing program by modulating Cdk levels. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:209-221.
60. Edwards M.C., et al. MCM2-7 complexes bind chromatin in a distributed pattern surrounding the origin recognition complex in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:33049-33057.
61. Dijkwel P.A., et al. Initiation sites are distributed at frequent intervals in the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase origin of replication but are used with very different efficiencies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:3053-3065.
62. Harvey K.J., Newport J. CpG methylation of DNA restricts prereplication complex assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:6769-6779.
63. Koren A., et al. MRC1-dependent scaling of the budding yeast DNA replication timing program. Genome Res. 2010, 20:781-790.
64. Alvino G.M., et al. Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:6396-6406.
65. Ma E., et al. Do replication forks control late origin firing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:2010-2019.
66. Rhind N. DNA replication timing: random thoughts about origin firing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:1313-1316.
67. Hozak P., Cook P.R. Replication factories. Trends Cell Biol. 1994, 4:48-52.
68. Baddeley D., et al. Measurement of replication structures at the nanometer scale using super-resolution light microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:e8.
69. Chen C.L., et al. Replication-associated mutational asymmetry in the human genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2327-2337.
70. Touchon M., et al. Replication-associated strand asymmetries in mammalian genomes: toward detection of replication origins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9836-9841.
71. Chagin V.O., et al. Organization of DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2:a000737.
72. Karschau J., et al. Optimal placement of origins for DNA replication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108:058101.
73. Ge X.Q., et al. Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:3331-3341.
74. Blow J.J., et al. How dormant origins promote complete genome replication. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:405-414.
75. Blow J.J., Ge X.Q. A model for DNA replication showing how dormant origins safeguard against replication fork failure. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10:406-412.
76. Gauthier M.G., et al. Defects and DNA replication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104:218104.
77. Sancar A., et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73:39-85.
78. Herrick J. Genetic variation and DNA replication timing, or why is there late replicating DNA?. Evolution 2011, 65:3031-3047.
79. Cairns J. The bacterial chromosome and its manner of replication as seen by autoradiography. J. Mol. Biol. 1963, 6:208-213.
80. Gratzner H.G. Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: a new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 1982, 218:474-475.
81. Jackson D.A., Pombo A. Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 140:1285-1295.
82. Bensimon A., et al. Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science 1994, 265:2096-2098.
83. Michalet X., et al. Dynamic molecular combing: stretching the whole human genome for high-resolution studies. Science 1997, 277:1518-2123.
84. Norio P., Schildkraut C.L. Visualization of DNA replication on individual Epstein-Barr virus episomes. Science 2001, 294:2361-2364.
85. Kitamura E., et al. Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories. Cell 2006, 125:1297-1308.
86. van Oijen A.M., Loparo J.J. Single-molecule studies of the replisome. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2010, 39:429-448.
87. Riehn R., et al. Restriction mapping in nanofluidic devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:10012-10016.
88. Sidorova J.M., et al. Microfluidic-assisted analysis of replicating DNA molecules. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:849-861.
89. Raghuraman M.K., et al. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001, 294:115-121.
90. Woodfine K., et al. Replication timing of the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13:191-202.
91. Desprat R., et al. Predictable dynamic program of timing of DNA replication in human cells. Genome Res. 2009, 19:2288-2299.
92. Chen C.L., et al. Impact of replication timing on non-CpG and CpG substitution rates in mammalian genomes. Genome Res. 2010, 20:447-457.
93. Yabuki N., et al. Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast. Genes Cells 2002, 7:781-789.
94. Retkute R., et al. Dynamics of DNA replication in yeast. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107:068103.
95. Jun S., et al. Nucleation and growth in one dimension. I. The generalized Kolmogorov-Johnson-Mehl-Avrami model. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 71:011908.
96. Yang S.C., et al. Computational methods to study kinetics of DNA replication. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 521:555-573.
97. Brummer A., et al. Mathematical modelling of DNA replication reveals a trade-off between coherence of origin activation and robustness against rereplication. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000783.