Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates fracture healing by stimulation of recruitment of both local and circulating osteogenic progenitors

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1516-1521

  Kumagai, Ken ^a   Takeuchi, Ryohei ^a   Ishikawa, Hiroyuki ^a   Yamaguchi, Yuichiro ^a   Fujisawa, Takahiro ^a   Kuniya, Takashi ^a   Takagawa, Shu ^a   Muschler, George F ^b   Saito, Tomoyuki ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

circulating osteogenic progenitors; fracture healing; homing; LIPUS

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CXCR4; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; STROMAL CELL DERIVED FACTOR 1;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CALLUS; CELL HOMING; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FRACTURE HEALING; HINDLIMB; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LOW INTENSITY PULSED ULTRASOUND; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; STEM CELL; THERAPY EFFECT; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; WILD TYPE;

ADULT STEM CELLS; ANIMALS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR; FRACTURE HEALING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, TRANSGENIC; OSTEOGENESIS; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 84863825994     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22103     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Patterson TE, Kumagai K, Griffith L, et al. 2008. Cellular strategies for enhancement of fracture repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90: 111-119. (Pubitemid 351329129)
2. Ikeda K, Takayama T, Suzuki N, et al. 2006. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the differentiation of C2C12 cells. Life Sci 79: 1936-1943. (Pubitemid 44485120)
3. Takayama T, Suzuki N, Ikeda K, et al. 2007. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic differentiation in ROS 17/2.8 cells. Life Sci 80: 965-971. (Pubitemid 46186424)
4. Rubin C, Bolander M, Ryaby JP, et al. 2001. The use of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A: 259-270. (Pubitemid 32163721)
5. Claes L, Willie B., 2007. The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 93: 384-398. (Pubitemid 44809399)
6. Azuma Y, Ito M, Harada Y, et al. 2001. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res 16: 671-680. (Pubitemid 32230595)
7. Takikawa S, Matsui N, Kokubu T, et al. 2001. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound initiates bone healing in rat nonunion fracture model. J Ultrasound Med 20: 197-205. (Pubitemid 32185196)
8. Dimitriou R, Tsiridis E, Giannoudis PV., 2005. Current concepts of molecular aspects of bone healing. Injury 36: 1392-1404. (Pubitemid 41618169)
9. Einhorn TA., 1998. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355: S7-S21.
10. Muschler GF, Midura RJ., 2002. Connective tissue progenitors: practical concepts for clinical applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395: 66-80. (Pubitemid 34136658)
11. Muschler GF, Midura RJ, Nakamoto C., 2003. Practical modeling concepts for connective tissue stem cell and progenitor compartment kinetics. J Biomed Biotechnol 2003: 170-193.
12. Muschler GF, Nakamoto C, Griffith LG., 2004. Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 1541-1558. (Pubitemid 38886548)
13. Eghbali-Fatourechi GZ, Lamsam J, Fraser D, et al. 2005. Circulating osteoblast-lineage cells in humans. N Engl J Med 352: 1959-1966. (Pubitemid 40638366)
14. Kumagai K, Vasanji A, Drazba JA, et al. 2008. Circulating cells with osteogenic potential are physiologically mobilized into the fracture healing site in the parabiotic mice model. J Orthop Res 26: 165-175. (Pubitemid 351220134)
15. Miao D, Scutt A., 2002. Histochemical localization of alkaline phosphatase activity in decalcified bone and cartilage. J Histochem Cytochem 50: 333-340. (Pubitemid 34171058)
16. Hou Z, Nguyen Q, Frenkel B, et al. 1999. Osteoblast-specific gene expression after transplantation of marrow cells: implications for skeletal gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 7294-7299. (Pubitemid 29299655)
17. Shirley D, Marsh D, Jordan G, et al. 2005. Systemic recruitment of osteoblastic cells in fracture healing. J Orthop Res 23: 1013-1021. (Pubitemid 41245423)
18. Alm JJ, Koivu HM, Heino TJ, et al. 2010. Circulating plastic adherent mesenchymal stem cells in aged hip fracture patients. J Orthop Res 28: 1634-1642.
19. Hietaniemi K, Peltonen J, Paavolainen P., 1995. An experimental model for non-union in rats. Injury 26: 681-686. (Pubitemid 26003039)
20. Choi P, Ogilvie C, Thompson Z, et al. 2004. Cellular and molecular characterization of a murine non-union model. J Orthop Res 22: 1100-1107. (Pubitemid 39145129)
21. Utvag SE, Grundnes O, Reikeraos O., 1996. Effects of periosteal stripping on healing of segmental fractures in rats. J Orthop Trauma 10: 279-284. (Pubitemid 126432702)
22. Kokubu T, Hak DJ, Hazelwood SJ, et al. 2003. Development of an atrophic nonunion model and comparison to a closed healing fracture in rat femur. J Orthop Res 21: 503-510. (Pubitemid 36546817)
23. Russell G, Tucci M, Conflitti J, et al. 2007. Characterization of a femoral segmental nonunion model in laboratory rats: report of a novel surgical technique. J Invest Surg 20: 249-255. (Pubitemid 47316873)
24. Garcia P, Holstein JH, Maier S, et al. 2008. Development of a reliable non-union model in mice. J Surg Res 147: 84-91. (Pubitemid 351635799)
25. Kratzel C, Bergmann C, Duda G, et al. 2008. Characterization of a rat osteotomy model with impaired healing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9: 135.
26. Oetgen ME, Merrell GA, Troiano NW, et al. 2008. Development of a femoral non-union model in the mouse. Injury 39: 1119-1126.
27. Baggiolini M., 1998. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature 392: 565-568. (Pubitemid 28207705)
28. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, et al. 2004. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med 10: 858-864. (Pubitemid 39070860)
29. Otsuru S, Tamai K, Yamazaki T, et al. 2008. Circulating bone marrow-derived osteoblast progenitor cells are recruited to the bone-forming site by the CXCR4/stromal cell-derived factor-1 pathway. Stem Cells 26: 223-234.
30. Penn MS., 2010. SDF-1:CXCR4 axis is fundamental for tissue preservation and repair. Am J Pathol 177: 2166-2168.
31. Kitaori T, Ito H, Schwarz EM, et al. 2009. Stromal cell-derived factor 1/CXCR4 signaling is critical for the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the fracture site during skeletal repair in a mouse model. Arthritis Rheum 60: 813-823.
32. Granero-Molto F, Weis JA, Miga MI, et al. 2009. Regenerative effects of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in fracture healing. Stem Cells 27: 1887-1898.