The impact of presentation graphics on preservice science teachers' attitudes towards physics

Journal of Baltic Science Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 141-152

  Erdemir, Naki ^a   Topcu, Mustafa Sami ^a  

^a YUZUNCU YIL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Attitudes towards physics; Presentation graphics; Preservice science teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863810970     PISSN: 16483898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adesoji, F. A. (2008). Managing students' attitude towards science through problem - solving instructional strategy. Anthropologist, 10 (1), 21-24.
2. Amare, N. (2006). To slideware or not to slideware: Students 'experiences with Presentation graphics vs. Lecture. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36 (3), 297-308.
3. Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2006). The impact of presentation graphics on students' experience in the classroom. Computers & Education, 47 (1), 116-126.
4. Atkins-Sayre, W., Hopkins, S., Mohundro, S., & Sayre, W. (1998, November). Rewards and liabilities of presentation software as an ancillary tool: Prison or paradise? Paper presented at the National Communication Association Eighty Fourth Annual Convention, New York.
5. Beets, S. D., & Lobingier, P. G. (2001). Pedagogical techniques: student performance and preferences. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 231-235.
6. Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science - Technology - Society STS approaches in the teaching of secondary science. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre.
7. Boylan, C. (1996). Attitudes toward teaching and taking science course - a correlation between teachers and students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Michigan University.
8. Craker, D. E. (2006). Attitudes toward science of students enrolled in introductory level science courses at UW-La Crosse. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 9, 1-6.
9. Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn, Physics Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 69, 54-64.
10. Erdemir, N. (2004). Fizik öǧetmen adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n öǧenimleri süecinde başari{dotless} ve tutum deǧişimlerinin belirlenmesi. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, K.T.?, Trabzon.
11. Erdemir, N. (2009). Determining students' attitude towards physics through problem-solving strategy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10 (2), 1-19.
12. Erdemir, N. (2011). The effect of powerpoint and traditional lectures on students' achievement in physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8 (3), 176-189.
13. Erdemir, N., & Çepni, S. (2007). According to years physics student teachers' attitudes and achievement interaction levels. Ondokuz Mayi{dotless}s University Faculty of Education Journal, 23, 60-69.
14. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: The McGraw Hill.
15. Frey, B. A., & Birnbaum, D. J. (2002). Learners' perceptions on the value of Presentation graphics in lectures. ERIC Document Reproduction Service: ED 467192.
16. Gonen, S., & Basaran, B. (2008). The new method of problem solving in physics education by using scorm-compliant content package. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 9 (3), 112-120.
17. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
18. Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness - A Neglected Variable in Discourse Processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179-194.
19. Houtz, L. E., & Gupta, U. G. (2001). Nebraska high school students' computer skills and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (3), 316-326.
20. Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning & Instruction, 12, 383-409.
21. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In Renninger, A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (Eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-25.
22. Long, J. C. (1981). The effects of a diagnostic-prescriptive teaching strategy on student achievement and attitude in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18 (6), 515-523.
23. Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and Presentation graphics in the physical geology lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301-305.
24. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender difference in attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (4), 324-340.
25. Morrell, P. D., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). Students attitudes toward school and classroom science: Are they independent phenomena? School Science and Physics, 98 (2), 76-83.
26. Newble, D. (1998). Assessment. In B. Jolly & L. Rees (Eds.), Medical Education in The Millennium, 131-142, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Normah. Y., & Salleh, I. (2006). Problem solving skills in probability among matriculation students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2), 40-55.
28. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.
29. Rankin, E. L., & Hoaas, D. J. (2001). The use of Presentation graphics and student performance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29, 113-128.
30. Reid, N., & Skryabina, E, A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20 (1), 67-81.
31. Rickman, J., & Grudzinzki, M. (2000). Student expectations of information technology use in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 1, 24-30.
32. Rivard L. P., & Straw, S. P. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593.
33. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), 211-224.
34. Shashaani, L. (1997). Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 37-51.
35. Szabo, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with Presentation graphics? Computers & Education, 35, 175-187.
36. Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (4), 413-424.
37. Yenilmez, K. (2008). Open primary education school students' opinions about mathematics television programmes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Tojde, 9 (4), 176-189.