Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 550-561

  Li, Yexin Jessica ^a   Kenrick, Douglas T ^a   Griskevicius, Vladas ^b   Neuberg, Steven L ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision biases; Evolutionary psychology; Loss aversion; Mating; Self protection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARRIAGE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MOTIVATION;

EID: 84863735601     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025844     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., . . . Schaller, M. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17, 836-840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x
2. Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283
3. Baker, M. J., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391-395. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.06.001
4. Baker, M. J., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1136-1139. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.006
5. Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628-647. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.628
6. Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Blackwell, K. C., & Smith, D. M. (2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 179-190. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.179
7. Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Consumer decision making: A choice goals approach. In C. P Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 589-610). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8. Bird, R. B., Smith, E. A., & Bird, D. W. (2001). The hunting handicap: Costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 9-19. doi:10.1007/s002650100338
9. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
10. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
11. Camerer, C. F. (2005). Three cheers-psychological, theoretical, empiri-cal-for loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 129-133. doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.129.62286
12. Chen, M. K., Lakshminaryanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). The evolution of our preferences: Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537. doi:10.1086/503550
13. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social ex-change. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions of the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1-73. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8
15. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Morris, R. (1990). Testosterone, social class, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 4,462 men. Psychological Science, 1, 209-211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00200.x
16. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution and behavior: Adaptations for reproduction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Willard Grant Press.
17. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
18. Darwin, C. (1872). The origin of species (6th ed.). London, England: Murray.
19. Domjan, M. (2005). Pavlovian conditioning: A functional perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 179-206. doi:10.1146/annurev .psych.55.090902.141409
20. Dunn, P. O., & Cockburn, A. (1999). Extrapair mate choice and honest signaling in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens. Evolution, 53, 938-946. doi:10.2307/2640733
21. Gachter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2961). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=1010597
22. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254-267. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.98.2.254
23. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When funda-mental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281
25. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. M., Cial-dini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 384-395. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384
26. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980-994. doi:10.1037/a0013907
27. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous con-sumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
28. Harinck, F., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Mersmann, P. (2007). When gains loom larger than losses: Loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099-1105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02031.x
29. Haselton, M. G., & Funder, D. C. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 15-37). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30. Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integra-tive evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 47-66. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
31. Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as a mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386-392.
32. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129-146. doi:10.1901/ jeab.2002.77-129
33. Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17-31. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185
35. Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. (2001). Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women's mate choice. Human Nature, 12, 89-105. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1018-6
36. Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292-314. doi:10.1177/1745691610369469
37. Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Sundie, J. M., Li, N. P., Li, Y. J., & Neuberg, S. L. (2009). Deep rationality: The evolutionary economics of decision-making. Social Cognition, 27, 764-785. doi:10.1521/ soco.2009.27.5.764
38. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relation-ships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951
39. Kenrick, D. T., Li, Y. J., White, A. E., & Neuberg, S. L. (in press). Economic subselves: Fundamental motives and deep rationality. In J. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Social thinking and interper-sonal behavior: The 14th Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental invest-ment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97-116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x
41. Kermer, D. A., Driver-Linn, E., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17, 649-653. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x
42. Keyser, A. J., & Hill, G. E. (2000). Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 202-209. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.2.202
43. Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psycho-logical Review, 109, 306-329. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.2.306
44. Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psy-chology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking ap-proach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313-376. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000081
45. Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards: III. Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioural Processes, 69, 173-187. doi:10.1016/ j.beproc.2005.02.003
46. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947
47. Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468
48. Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 139-145. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.2.139
49. Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A. M., Mueller, A. M., Hehli, D. J., & Wegener, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between-and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251-261. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.251
50. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353-363. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X98001228
51. Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Anchor.
52. New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 16598-16603. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0703913104
53. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 119-128. doi:10.1509/ jmkr.42.2.119.62292
54. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483-522. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.483
55. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm: Background, recent developments, and the way for-ward. International Annals of Criminology, 41, 243-269.
56. Price, T., Schluter, D., & Heckman, N. E. (1993). Sexual selection when the female benefits directly. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 48, 187-211. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00887.x
57. Rick, S. (in press). Losses, gains, and brains: Neuroeconomics can help to answer open questions about loss aversion. Journal of Consumer Psy-chology. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.04.004
58. Rozin, P., & Kalat, J. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning. Psychological Review, 78, 459-486. doi:10.1037/h0031878
59. Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Mueller, A. (2003). Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereo-types. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 637-649. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005008
60. Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94, 439-454. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.439
61. Smith, E. A., Bird, R. B., & Bird, D. W. (2003). The benefits of costly signaling: Meriam turtle hunters. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 14, 116-126. doi:10.1093/beheco/14.1.116
62. Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Con-spicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 100, 664-680. doi:10.1037/a0021669
64. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenwald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411-429. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
65. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39-60. doi:10.1016/ 0167-2681(80)90051-7
66. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: The Darwinian pivot (pp. 136-179). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
67. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981, January 30). The framing of deci-sions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
68. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061. doi:10.2307/2937956
69. Van Vugt, M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2006). The altruism puzzle: Psychological adaptations for prosocial behaviour. In M. Schaller, D. Kenrick, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 237-261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
70. Vohs, K. D., & Luce, M. F. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 733-756). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
71. Wang, X. T. (1996). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Vio-lations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60, 31-63. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00700-8
72. White, R. E., Thornhill, S., & Hampson, E. (2006). Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Pro-cesses, 100, 21-34. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.001
73. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk-taking, and vio-lence: The young male syndrome. Ethology & Sociobiology, 6, 59-73. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X
74. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biology Letters, 271(Suppl.), S177-S179. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.013
75. Winterhalder, B. (2007). Risk and decision-making. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 433-446). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
76. Zahavi, A. (1977). The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 67, 603-605. doi:10.1016/ 0022-5193(77)90061-3
77. Zhang, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2005). The role of anticipated emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 316-324. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_6