Environmental proteomics, biodiversity statistics and food-web structure

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 436-442

  Gotelli, Nicholas J ^a   Ellison, Aaron M ^b   Ballif, Bryan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOFILM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FOOD WEB; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; PREDATOR; PROTEIN; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BIOTA; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD CHAIN; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84863555035     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Maron P.A., et al. Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying functional microbial ecology. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 53:486-493.
2. Schneider T., Riedel K. Environmental proteomics: analysis of structure and function of microbial communities. Proteomics 2010, 10:785-798.
3. Vandenkoornhuyse P., et al. Integration of molecular functions at the ecosystemic level: breakthroughs and future goals of environmental genomics and post-genomics. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:776-791.
4. VerBerkmoes N.C., et al. Functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:196-205.
5. Ram R.J., et al. Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm. Science 2005, 308:1915-1920.
6. Delmotte N., et al. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:16428-16433.
7. Kan J., et al. Metaproteomic analysis of Chesapeake Bay microbial communities. Saline Syst. 2005, 1:7.
8. Schulze W.Z., et al. A proteomics fingerprint of dissolved organic carbon and of soil particles. Oecologia 2005, 142:335-343.
9. Nesatyy V.J., Suter M.J.F. Proteomics for the analysis of environmental stress responses in organisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:6891-6900.
10. Tomanek L., Zuzow M.J. The proteomic response of the mussel congeners Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. trossulus to acute heat stress: implications for thermal tolerance limits and metabolic costs of thermal stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213:3559-3574.
11. Vaitkevicius K., et al. A Vibrio cholerae protease needed for killing of Caenorhabditis elegans has a role in protection from natural predator grazing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:9280-9285.
12. Banfield J.F., et al. Proteogenomic approaches for the molecular characterization of natural microbial communities. OMICS 2005, 9:301-333.
13. Schultze W. Environmental proteomics - what proteins from soil and surface water can tell us: a perspective. Biogeosci. Discuss. 2004, 1:195-218.
14. Grossert H.-P. Ecological consequences of bacterioplankton lifestyles: changes in concepts are needed. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2:706-714.
15. Moore J.C., et al. Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:584-600.
16. Wilmes P., Bond P.L. Metaproteomics: studying functional gene expression in microbial ecosystems. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14:92-97.
17. Biron D.G., et al. Population proteomics: an emerging discipline to study metapopulation ecology. Proteomics 2006, 6:1712-1715.
18. Gotelli N.J., Ellison A.M. Food-web models predict species abundances in response to habitat change. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:1869-1873.
19. Gotelli N.J., et al. Proteomic characterization of the major arthropod associates of the carnivorous pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea. Proteomics 2011, 11:2354-2358.
20. Beck M., et al. Comprehensive proteomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22:3-8.
21. Thakur S.S., et al. Deep and highly sensitive proteome coverage by LC-MS/MS without prefractionation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10. 10.1074/mcp.M110.003699.
22. Wilm M. Quantitative proteomics in biological research. Proteomics 2009, 9:4590-4605.
23. Walther T.C., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:491-500.
24. Groen A.J., Lilly K.S. Proteomics of total membranes and subcellular membranes. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7:867-878.
25. Goswami T., Ballif B.A. Methods for the isolation of phosphoproteins and phosphopeptides for mass spectrometry analysis: toward increased functional phosphoproteomics. Sample Preparation in Biological Mass Spectrometry 2011, 627-655. Springer. A. Ivanov, A. Lazarev (Eds.).
26. Chen C., et al. Protein bioinformatics databases and resources. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 694:3-24.
27. Jacob R.J. Bioinformatics for LC-MS/MS-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 658:61-91.
28. Jost L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 2007, 88:2427-2439.
29. Digel C., et al. Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs. Oikos 2011, 120:503-509.
30. Rosenzweig M. Species Diversity in Space and Time 1995, Cambridge University Press.
31. Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment 2011, Oxford University Press. A.E. Magurran, B.J. McGill (Eds.).
32. Cohen J.E. Food Webs and Niche Space 1978, Princeton University Press.
33. Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs 2005, Oxford University Press. M. Pascual, J.A. Dunne (Eds.).
34. Hughes J.B., et al. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67:4399-4406.
35. Longino J.T., et al. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 2002, 83:689-702.
36. Van Straalen N.I., Roelofs D. Introduction to Ecological Genetics 2006, Oxford University Press.
37. Shen Y.F., et al. Ultra-high-efficiency strong cation exchange LC/RPLC/MS/MS for high dynamic range characterization of the human plasma proteome. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:1134-1144.
38. Guercio R.A.P., et al. Ontogenetic variations in the venom proteome of the Amazonian snake Bothrops atrox. Proteome Sci. 2006, 4. 10.1186/1477-5956-4-11.
39. Lundgren D.H., et al. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7:39-53.
40. McGill B.J. Species abundance distributions. Biological Diversity: Frontiers In Measurement & Assessment 2011, 105-122. Oxford University Press. A.E. Magurran, B.J. McGill (Eds.).
41. Connolly S.R., et al. Testing species abundance models: a new bootstrap approach applied to Indo-Pacific coral reefs. Ecology 2009, 90:3138-3149.
42. Gotelli N.J., Colwell R.K. Estimating species richness. Biological Diversity: Frontiers In Measurement & Assessment 2011, 39-54. Oxford University Press. A.E. Magurran, B.J. McGill (Eds.).
43. Colwell R.K., Coddington J.A. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1994, 345:101-118.
44. Chao A., et al. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 2009, 90:1125-1133.
45. Colwell R.K., et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation, and comparison of assemblages. J. Plant Ecol. 2012, 5:3-21.
46. Koziol J.A., et al. Application of capture-recapture models to estimation of protein count in MudPIT experiments. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:3203-3207.
47. Michener W.K., Jones M.B. Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:85-93.
48. Holyoak M., Sachdev S. Omnivory and the stability of simple food webs. Oecologia 1998, 117:413-419.
49. Allesina S., et al. A general model for food web structure. Science 2008, 320:658-661.
50. Wootton J.T. Indirect effects, prey susceptibility, and habitat selection - impacts of birds on limpets and algae. Ecology 1992, 73:981-991.
51. Becks L., et al. Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web. Nature 2005, 435:1226-1229.
52. Eveleigh E.S., et al. Fluctuations in density of an outbreak species drive diversity cascades in food webs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:16976-16981.
53. Lacerda C.M.R., et al. Metaproteomic analysis of a bacterial community response to cadmium exposure. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:1145-1152.
54. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
55. Nagy R., et al. The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species. Plant J. 2005, 42:236-250.
56. Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. A statistical toolbox for metagenomics: assessing functional diversity in microbial communities. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:34.
57. Rosenfield J.S. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 2002, 98:156-162.
58. Mouchet M.A., et al. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:867-876.
59. Hecky R.E., Kilham P. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in fresh-water and marine environments - a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1988, 33:796-822.
60. Smith V.H., et al. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 1999, 100:179-196.
61. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B: Methodol. 1995, 57:289-300.
62. Efron B. The future of indirect evidence. Stat. Sci. 2010, 25:145-157.
63. Storey J.D., Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 106:9440-9445.
64. Huttlin E.L., et al. Prediction of error associated with false positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:392-398.
65. Dudoit S., et al. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Stat. Sci. 2003, 18:71-103.
66. Gotelli N.J., Ulrich W. The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations. Oecologia 2010, 162:463-477.
67. Durr E., et al. Direct proteomic mapping of the lung microvascular endothelial cell surface in vivo and in cell culture. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22:985-992.
68. Chao A. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 1987, 43:783-791.
69. Baker B.J., Banfield J.F. Microbial communities associated with acid mine drainage. FEMS Microb. Rev. 2003, 44:139-152.