Conversational strategies that support idea generation productivity in groups

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference Proceedings - Long Papers, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 398-405

  Kumar, Rohit ^a   Beuth, Jack L ^b   Rosé, Carolyn P ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; FEEDBACK APPROACH; IDEA GENERATION; JOINT EFFECT; ON DYNAMICS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; TWO DIRECTIONS;

EID: 84863399275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ai, H., Kumar, R., Nguyen, D., Nagasunder, A., Rose, C. P. (2010). Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Capabilities and Goal Alignment in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, in Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Pittsburgh PA
2. Bales, R. (1958). Task Roles and Social Roles in Problem Solving Groups, Readings in Social Psychology, E.E. Maccoby, et al. (eds.), New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
3. Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA
4. Bhatt, K., Evens, M., Argamon, S. (2004). Hedged responses and expressions of affect in human/human and human/computer tutorial interactions. In Proc. of the Cognitive Science Society, 114-119, Chicago, IL.
5. Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Joshi, M., Terrell, E., Higgs, F., Aleven, V., Rosé, C. P. (2008). It's Not Easy Being Green: Supporting Collaborative Green Design Learning. In Proc. of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 807-809, Montreal, Canada.
6. Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Howley, I., Rosé, C. P. (2009). Engaging Collaborative Learners with Helping Agents. In Proc of AI in Education, 365-372, Amsterdam.
7. Chi, M. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-488.
8. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53(3), 497-509.
9. D'Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., Frankin, S., Picard, R., Graesser, A. C. (2005). Integrating Affect Sensors in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proc. of Workshop on Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop at IUI, 7-13, New York, NY
10. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539.
11. Joshi, M. & Rosé, C. P. (2007). Using Transactivity in Conversation Summarization in Educational Dialog. Proceedings of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, 53-56, Farmington, PA.
12. Kumar, R., Gweon, G., Joshi, M., Cui, Y., Rosé, C. P. (2007a). Supporting students working together on Math with Social Dialogue. Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, Farmington, PA.
13. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A. (2007b). Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support. In Proc. of AI in Education, 383-390, Los Angeles, CA.
14. Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J., Rosé, C. P. (2010). Socially-capable Conversational Tutors can be Effective in Collaborative Learning Situations, in Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 156-164, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Kumar, R. & Rosé, C. P. (2011). Architecture for building Conversational Agents that support Collaborative Learning, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies Special issue on Intelligent and Innovative Support Systems for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21-34.
16. Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave
17. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, NJ
18. Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186-213. (Pubitemid 44350195)
19. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Wang, H-C., Rosé, C.P., Cue, Y., Chang, C-Y. Huang, C-C., & Li, T-Y. (2007). Thinking hard together: the long and short of collaborative idea generation in scientific inquiry, in Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, New Brunswick, NJ.
21. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33 (1), 1-30. (Pubitemid 40317592)