Exploring the unique roles of trust and play in private creativity: From the complexity-ambiguity-metaphor link to the trust-play-creativity link

Journal of Trust Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-97

  Li, Peter Ping ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

ambiguity; complexity; creativity; improvisation; metaphor; play; relaxation; trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863377676     PISSN: 21515581     EISSN: 2151559X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2012.659937     Document Type: Article

References (160)

1. Aldous, C.R., 2007. Creativity, problem solving and innovative science: Insights from history, cognitive psychology and neuroscience. International Education Journal, 8: 176–186.
2. Amabile, T.M., 1983. The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag New York.
3. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, M., 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154–1184.
4. Amabile, T.M., and Conti, R., 1999. Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 630–640.
5. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C.K.W., and Nijstad, B.A., 2004. The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 147–173.
6. Anderson, N.R., and West, M.A., 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 235–258.
7. Arieti, S., 1976. Creativity: The magic synthesis, New York: Basic Books.
8. Atherton, C., 1993. The Stoics on ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bai, Y., Li, P.P., & Xi, Y., (in press). The distinctive effects of dual-level leadership behaviors on employees’ trust in leadership: An empirical study from China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management (in press). doi: 10.1007/s10490-011-9280-6.
10. Basseches, M., 1984. Dialectical thinking and adult development, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Bastick, T., 1982. Intuition: How we think and act, New York: Wiley.
12. Begley, S., 2008. Train your mind: Change your brain, New York: Ballantine Books.
13. Bells, I.R., and Koithan, M., 2006. Models for the study of whole systems. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 5: 293–307.
14. Benack, S., Basseches, M., and Swan, T., 1989. “ Dialectical thinking and adult creativity ”. In Handbook of creativity, Edited by: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., and Reynolds, C.R., 199–208. New York: Plenum Press.
15. Berliner, P.F., 1994. Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
16. Bidault, F., and Castello, A., 2009. Trust and creativity: Understanding the role of trust in creativity oriented joint developments. R&D Management, 39: 259–270.
17. Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z.V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., and Devins, G., 2004. Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 11: 230–241.
18. Black, M., 1962. Models and metaphor, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Boden, M.A., 1994. Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
20. Bowers, K.S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., and Parker, K., 1990. Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22: 72–119.
21. Brown, T., 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, New York: Harper Collins.
22. Bruner, J., 1962. “ The conditions of creativity ”. In Contemporary approaches to creative thinking, (3rd ed.), Edited by: Gruber, H.E., Terrell, G., and Wertheimer, M., 1–30. New York: Atherton Press.
23. Byers, W., 2007. How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Carnevale, P.J., and Probst, T.M., 1998. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1300–1309.
25. Chae, B., and Bloodgood, J.M., 2006. The paradoxes of knowledge management: An Eastern philosophical perspective. Information and Organization, 16: 1–26.
26. Chen, M-J., 2008. Reconceptualizing the competition–cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17: 288–304.
27. Chen, M-J., and Miller, D., 2011. The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. Academy of Management Perspective, 25 (3): 6–18.
28. Chua, R.Y.J., Morris, M.W., and Ingram, P., 2010. Embeddedness and new idea discussion in professional networks: The mediating role of affect-based trust. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44: 85–104.
29. Clegg, C., Unsworth, K.L., Epitropaki, O., and Parker, G., 2002. Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 409–422.
30. Dane, E., and Pratt, M.G., 2009. “ Conceptualizating and measuring intuition: A review of recent trends ”. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology, Edited by: Hodgkinson, G.P., and Ford, J.K., Vol. 24, 1–40. New York: Wiley.
31. Dansky, J., 1980. Make-believe: A mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Development, 51: 576–579.
32. Dansky, J., and Silverman, I., 1973. Effects of play on associative fluency in pre-school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 9: 28–43.
33. Daston, A.C., 1998. Fear and loathing of the imagination in science. Daedalus, 127: 73–95.
34. DeFillippi, R., Grabher, E., and Jones, C., 2007. Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 511–521.
35. Dijksterhuis, A., and Nordgren, L.F., 2006. A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1: 95–109.
36. Dodd, D., & Favaro, K., 2006. Managing the right tension. Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 62–74.
37. Dowd, E.T., 1989. “ The self and creativity: Several constructs in search of a theory ”. In Handbook of creativity, Edited by: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., and Reynolds, C.R., 233–242. New York: Plenum Press.
38. Duggan, W., 2007. Strategic intuition: Creative spark in human development, New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Dunbar, K., 1995. “ How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories ”. In The nature of insight, Edited by: Sternberg, R.J., and Davidson, J.E., 365–395. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Edmondson, A., 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383.
41. Elkind, D., 2007. The power of play: How spontaneous, imaginative activities lead to happier, healthier children, Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
42. Elsbach, K.D., and Hargadon, A.B., 2006. Enhancing creativity through ‘mindless’ work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17: 470–483.
43. Epstein, S., 1999. “ The interpretation of dreams from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self theory ”. In At play in the fields of consciousness, Edited by: Singer, J.A., and Salovey, P.S., 51–82. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Evans, J.St.B.T., 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 255–278.
45. Fein, G.G., 1981. Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52: 1095–1118.
46. Fein, G.G., 1987. “ Pretend play: Creativity and consciousness ”. In Curiosity, Imagination, and Play, Edited by: Gorlitz, P., and Wohlwill, J., 281–304. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Fernandez-Duque, D., and Johnson, M.L., 1999. Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23: 83–116.
48. Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., and Smith, S.M., 1992. Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Fredrickson, B.L., 2001. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56: 218–226.
50. Gao, C., 1994. The traditional Chinese mode of cognition (in Chinese), Jinan, China: Shandong University Press.
51. Gentner, D., and Bowdle, B., 2008. “ Metaphor as structure-mapping ”. In The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Edited by: Gibbs, R., 109–128. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Gong, Y., Cheung, S-Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J-C., (in press). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206310380250.
53. Gordon, W.J.J., 1961. Synectics: The development of creative capacity, New York: Collier Books.
54. Graham, A.C., 1986. Yin-Yang and the nature of correlative thinking, Singapore: The Institute of East Asian Philosophies.
55. Gregory, P.N. 1987. Sudden and gradual: Approaches to enlightenment in Chinese thought. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
56. Guenther, H.V., 1958. The levels of understanding in Buddhism. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 78: 19–28.
57. Guilford, J.P., 1968. Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications, San Diego, CA: Knapp.
58. Hadamard, J., 1945. The psychology of invention in the mathematical field, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Hall, D.L., 1978. Process and anarchy—A Taoist vision of creativity. Philosophy East and West, 28: 271–285.
60. Hall, D.L., and Ames, R.T., 1995. Anticipating China: Thinking through the narratives of Chinese and Western culture, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
61. Hayes, J.R., 1981. The complete problem-solver, Philadelphia, PA: The Franklin Institute Press.
62. Helie, S., and Sun, R., 2010. Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117: 994–1024.
63. Hennessey, B.A., and Amabile, T.M., 2010. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61: 569–598.
64. Hesse, M.B., 1966. “ Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame ”. In University of Notre Dame Press
65. Hideki, Y., 1973. Creativity and intuition: A physicist looks at East and West, New York: Kodansha.
66. Hodgkinson, G.P., Langan-Fox, J., and Sadler-Smith, E., 2008. Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioral sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99: 1–27.
67. Hulsheger, U.R., Anderson, N., and Salgado, J.F., 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1128–1145.
68. Isaacson, W., 2011. Steve Jobs, London: Little Brown.
69. Jung, C.C., 1964. Forward (An introduction to Zen Buddhism, D.T., Suzuki) (9–29). New York: Grove Press.
70. Kasof, J., 1997. Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10: 303–315.
71. Katz, A., 1997. “ Creativity and the cerebral hemispheres ”. In Creativity research handbook, Edited by: Runco, M., Vol. 1, 203–226. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
72. Kaufman, S.B., 2009. Faith in intuition: Is associated with decreased latent inhibition in a sample of high-achieving adolescents. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3: 28–34.
73. Kershaw, T.C., and Ohlsson, S., 2004. Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30: 3–13.
74. Klein, G., 1998. Sources of power: How people make decisions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Klinke, A., and Renn, O., 2002. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22: 1071–1094.
76. Koehler, W., 1947. Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology, New York: Liveright Publishing.
77. Koestler, A., 1964. The art of creation, New York: Macmillan.
78. Krasnor, I., and Pepler, D., 1980. The study of children's play: some suggested future directions. New Directions for Child Development, 9: 85–94.
79. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M., 1999. Philosophical in the flesh: Cognitive science brings to philosophy the embodied mind, the cognitive unconscious, and metaphorical thought, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
81. Langer, E.J., 1989. Mindfulness, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
82. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G., and Zytkow, J., 1987. Scientific discovery: An account of the creative processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Laughlin, C., 1997. “ The nature of intuition: A neuropsychological approach ”. In Intuition: The inside story, Edited by: Davis-Floyd, R., and Arvidson, P.S., 19–37. New York: Routledge.
84. Levinthal, D., and Rerup, C., 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17: 502–513.
85. Li, P.P., 1998. Toward a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19: 829–861.
86. Li, P.P., 2007. Toward an inter-disciplinary conceptualization of trust: A typological approach. Management and Organization Review, 3: 421–445.
87. Li, P.P., 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4: 413–439.
88. Li, P.P., 2010. Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning. Journal of International Management, 16: 43–59.
89. Li, P.P., 2011a. The rigor-relevance balance for engaged scholarship: New frame and new agenda for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 1: 1–21.
90. Li, P.P., 2011b. Toward a multi-frame integration of trust as holistic and dynamic: Ambiguity redefined as a duality of diversity-in-unity. Journal of Trust Research, 1: 133–138.
91. Li, P.P., (in press). Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (online). doi: 10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z.
92. Lieberman, J.N., 1977. Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity, New York: Academic Press.
93. Liu, D., Chen, X-P., and Xin, Y., 2011. From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 294–309.
94. Lubart, T., and Guignard, J., 2004. “ The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach ”. In Creativity: From potential to realization, Edited by: Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., and Singer, J.L., 43–56. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
95. Luhmann, N., 1979. Trust and power, Chichester: Wiley.
96. March, J.G., 1982. “ The technology of foolishness ”. In Ambiguity and choice in organizations, Edited by: March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P., 69–81. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
97. March, J.G., 1991. Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–86.
98. March, J.G., 1994. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen, New York: Free Press.
99. Marton, F., Fensham, P., and Chaiklin, S., 1994. A Nobel's eye view of scientific intuition. International Journal of Science Education, 16: 457–473.
100. Mayer, J., and Mussweiler, T., 2011. Suspicious spirits, flexible minds: When distrust enhances creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101: 1262–1277.
101. Mednick, S.A., 1962. The associative basis for the creative process. Psychological Bulletin, 69: 220–232.
102. Michalko, M., 1991. Thinkertoys: A handbook of business creativity, New York: Ten Speed Press.
103. Miller, D.L., 1989. The philosophy of creativity, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
104. Miller, A.I., 1996. Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art, New York: Springer.
105. Mintzberg, H., 1976. Planning on the left side and managing on the right. Harvard Business Review, July–August, pp. 49–58.
106. Morin, E., 2008. On complexity, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
107. Murray, E.L., 1986. Imaginative thinking and human experience, Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.
108. Nachmanovitch, S., 1990. Free play: Improvisation in life and art, New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
109. Newell, A., Shaw, J.C., and Simon, H.A., 1962. “ The process of creative thinking ”. In Contemporary approaches to creative thinking(63–119), 3rd ed, Edited by: Gruber, H.E., Terrell, G., and Wertheimer, M., New York: Atherton Press.
110. Peng, K., and Nisbett, R., 1999. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. The American Psychologist, 54: 741–754.
111. Perkins, D.N., 1981. The mind's best work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
112. Perkins, D.N., 1985. What else but genius? Six dimensions of the creative mind. In M.R., Raju J.A., Phillips F., Harlow, Creativity in science (pp. 15–27). Los Alamos, NM Los Alamos National Laboratory.
113. Perkins, D.N., 2000. The Eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking, New York: Norton.
114. Planck, M., 1950. Scientific autobiography and other papers, London: Williams & Norgate.
115. Plucker, J.A., and Renzulli, J.S., 1999. “ Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity ”. In Handbook of creativity, Edited by: Sternberg, R.J., 35–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Poincaré, H., (1913/1946). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. Lancaster, PA: Science Press (Original work published 1913).
117. Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
118. Popper, K.R., 1959. The logic of scientific discovery, New York: Basic Books.
119. Porkert, M., 1978. Theoretical foundations of Chinese medicine: Systems of correspondence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Prietula, M., and Simon, H.A., 1989. “ The experts in your midst ”. In Harvard Business Review, January–February 120–124.
121. Rokeach, M., 1960. The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief system and personality systems, New York: Basic Books.
122. Rothenberg, A., 1979. The emerging goddess, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
123. Runco, M.A., 1991. Divergent thinking, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
124. Runco, M.A., 2004. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 657–687.
125. Runco, M.A., 2007. Creativity theories and themes: Research, development, and practice, Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
126. Russ, S.W., 1993. Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
127. Russ, S.W., 2004. Play in child development and psychotherapy: Toward empirically supported practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
128. Salas, E., Rosen, M.A., and DiazGranados, D., 2010. Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36: 941–973.
129. Sawyer, K., 2011. The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23: 137–154.
130. Sawyer, R.K., 1997. Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Schmidt, G.L., DeBuse, C.J., and Seger, C.A., 2007. Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language, 10: 127–141.
132. Schooler, J.W., Fallshore, M., and Fiore, S.M., 1995. “ Epilogue: Putting insight into perspective ”. In The nature of insight, Edited by: Sternberg, R.J., and Davidson, J.E., 559–587. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
133. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., and Oldham, G.R., 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30: 933–958.
134. Shavinina, L.V., 2004. Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies, 15: 243–254.
135. Simon, H.A., 1966. “ Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving ”. In Mind and cosmos, Edited by: Colodny, R.G., 22–40. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
136. Simon, H.A., 1973. The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4: 181–201.
137. Singer, D., and Singer, J.L., 1990. The house of make-believe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
138. Singer, J.L., 2004. “ Concluding comments: Crossover creativity or domain specificity ”. In Creativity: From potential to realization, Edited by: Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., and Singer, J.L., 195–203. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
139. Sio, U.N., and Ormerod, T.C., 2009. Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135: 94–120.
140. Sivin, N., 2000. Medicine (Science and civilization in China, Vol. VI: Biology and Biological Technology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Smith, W.K., and Lewis, M.W., 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36: 381–403.
142. Stacey, R.D., 1996. Complexity and creativity in organizations, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
143. Stacey, R.D., Griffin, D., and Shaw, P., 2000. Complexity and management, London: Routledge.
144. Sternberg, R.J., 2006. “ Introduction ”. In International Handbook of creativity, Edited by: Kaufman, J.C., and Sternberg, R.J., 1–9. New York: Cambridge University Press.
145. Suddaby, R., Hardy, C., and Huy, Q.H., 2011. Where are the new theories of organization: Introduction to the Special Topic Forum. Academy of Management Review, 36: 236–246.
146. Suzuki, D.T., 1964. An introduction to Zen Buddhism, New York: Grove Press.
147. Tan, L.H., Laird, A.R., Li, K., and Fox, P.T., 2005. Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabet words: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Development, 25: 83–91.
148. Thera, N., 1996. The heart of Buddhist meditation, York Beach, MN: Samuel Weiser.
149. Thomas, N.J.T., 1999. Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive Science, 23: 207–245.
150. Vaughan, T.D., 1985. The balance of opposites in the creative process. Gifted Education International, 3: 38–42.
151. von Franz, M-L., 1992. Psyche and matter, Boston, MA: Shambhala.
152. Voss, J.F., and Means, M.L., 1989. “ Toward a model of creativity based upon problem solving in the social science ”. In Handbook of creativity, Edited by: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., and Reynolds, C.R., 399–410. New York: Plenum Press.
153. Walker, W.E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J.P., van Asselt, M.B.A., Janssen, P., and Krayer von Krauss, M.P., 2003. Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4: 5–17.
154. Wallas, G., 1926. The art of thought, New York: Franklin Watts.
155. Weick, K.E., 1995. Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
156. Weick, K.E., 1998. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9: 543–555.
157. Weick, K.E., and Sutcliffe, K.M., 2006. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17: 514–524.
158. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., and Griffin, R.W., 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293–321.
159. Yu, C., 2009. On the integration of the Chinese and Western epistemologies, Beijing, China: People's Press. (in Chinese)
160. Zhong, C-B., Dijksterhuis, A., and Galinsky, A.D., 2008. The merits of unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological Science, 19: 912–918.