Embeddedness and new idea discussion in professional networks: The mediating role of affect-based trust

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 85-104

  Chua, Roy Y J ^a   Morris, Michael W ^b   Ingram, Paul ^b  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b 718 Uris Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Embeddedness; Innovation; Networks; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956925693     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01327.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AHUJA, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425-455.
2. AMABILE, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.
3. ANDREWS, K. M., & DELAHAY, B. L (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 797-810.
4. BARON, R. M., & KENNY, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. BULTER, J. K. (1991). Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a condition of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643-663.
6. BURT, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
7. BURT, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. BURT, R. S., & KNEZ. M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7, 255-292.
9. CAMPBELL, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
10. CHUA, R. Y. J., INGRAM, P., & MORRIS, M. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 436-452.
11. CHUA, R. Y. J., MORRIS, M., & INGRAM, P. (in press). Guanxi versus networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese and American managers. Journal of International Business Studies.
12. COLEMAN, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
13. COOK, J., & WALL, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
14. COOK, K. S., & EMERSON, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.
15. DROLET, A. L, & MORRIS, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 26-50.
16. FERRIN, D. L., DIRKS, K. T., & SHAH, P. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 870-883.
17. HANSEN, M. T., & OETINGER. B. (2001). Introducing T-shaped managers: Knowledge management's next generation. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 107.
18. HARGADON, A. B., & BECHKY, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500.
19. HARRISON, D. & LABERGE, M. (2002). Innovation, identities and resistance: The social construction of an innovation network. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4): 497-521.
20. HAUSMAN, J., HALL, B. H., & GRILICHES, Z. (1984). Econometric-models for count data with an application to the patents-R and D relationship. Econometrlca, 52, 909-938.
21. HOFFMAN, D., GRIFFIN, M., & GAVIN, M. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
22. HOUSE, J. S., UMBERSON, D., & LANDIS, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
23. IBARRA, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation Involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471-501.
24. INGRAM, P., & ROBERTS P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387.
25. KADUSHN, C. (1982). Social density and mental health. In P. V. Marsden & N.Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 147-158). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. KIJKUIT, B., & van dem ENDE, J. (2007). The organizational life of an idea: integrating social network, creativity and decision making perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 863-882.
27. KOGUT, B., & ZANDER, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
28. KRAMER, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions, Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
29. KURTZBERG, T. R., & AMABILE, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294
30. LABIANCA, G., BRASS, D. J., & GRAY, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 55-67.
31. LEVIN, D. Z., & CROSS. R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
32. LEWIS, J. D., & WEIGERT. A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
33. MATHISEN, G. E., MARTINSEN, O., & EINARSEN, S. (2008). The relationship between creative personality composition, innovative team climate, and team innovativeness: An input-process-output perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 13-31.
34. MAYER, R. C, DAVIS, J. H., & SCHOORMAN, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
35. McALLISTER, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for Interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.
36. MUMFORD, M. D., & GÜSTAFSON, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
37. NEMETH, C. J., PERSONNAZ, M., PERSONNAZ, B., & GONCALO, J. A. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 365-374.
38. NG, K. Y., & CHUA, R. Y. J. (2006). Do I contribute more when I trust more?: Differential effects of cognition- and affect-based trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 43-66.
39. OBSTFELD, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100-130.
40. PENLEY, L E., & HAWKINS, B. (1985). Studying interpersonal communication in organizations: Leadership application. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 309-326.
41. PERRY-SMITH, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative. The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85-102.
42. PERRY-SMITH, J. E., & SHALLEY, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 860-875.
43. PODSAKOFF, P. M., MACKENZIE, S. B., LEE, J., & PODSAKOFF, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
44. POLISTER, P. E. (1980). Network analysis and the logic of social support. In R. H. Price & P. E. Polister (Eds.), Evaluation and action in the social environment (pp. 69-87). New York: Academic Press.
45. REAGANS, R., & McEVILY, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
46. REAGANS, R. E., & ZUCKERMAN, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity and performance: The social capital of corporate R& D units. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
47. REMPEL, J. K., HOLMES, J. G., & ZANNA, M. D. (1985). Trust In close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95-112.
48. SIMONTON, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273-1286.
49. SPARROWE, R. T., LIDEN, R. C, WAYNE, S. J., & KRALMER, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
50. STABER, Ü. (2004). Networking beyond organizational boundaries: The case of project organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 73(1).
51. TSAI, W., & GOSHAL, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
52. UZZI, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
53. UZZI, B. (1999). Social relation and networks in the making of financial capital. American Sociological Review, 64, 481-505.
54. UZZI, B., & LANCASTER, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4), 383-399.
55. WALKER, G., KOGUT, B., & SHAN, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109-125.
56. WELLMAN, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19-61). UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. WOODMAN, R. W., SAWYER, J. E., & GRIFFIN, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
58. ZUCKER, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.