Genome-wide analysis of syntenic gene deletion in the grasses

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 265-277

  Schnable, James C ^a   Freeling, Michael ^a   Lyons, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene loss; Poaceae; Polyploidy; Speciation; Synteny

Indexed keywords

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; POACEAE; TELEOSTEI;

ARTICLE; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME; POACEAE; POLYPLOIDY; SYNTENY;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, PLANT; POACEAE; POLYPLOIDY; SYNTENY;

EID: 84863210911     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexandrov NN, et al. 2009. Insights into corn genes derived from largescale cDNA sequencing. Plant Mol Biol. 69:179-194.
2. Barker MS, et al. 2008. Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years. Mol Biol Evol. 25:2445-2455.
3. Baucom RS, et al. 2009. Exceptional diversity, non-random distribution, and rapid evolution of retroelements in the B73 maize genome. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000732.
4. Bikard D, et al. 2009. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323: 623-626.
5. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16:1679-1691.
6. Buggs RJ, et al. 2010. Characterization of duplicate gene evolution in the recent natural allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus by nextgeneration sequencing and Sequenom iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping. Mol Ecol. 19:132-146.
7. Chang PL, Dilkes BP, McMahon M, Comai L, Nuzhdin SV. 2010. Homoeolog-specific retention and use in allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica depends on parent of origin and network partners. Genome Biol. 11:R125.
8. De Bodt S, Maere S, van de Peer Y. 2005. Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:591-597.
9. Dehal P, Boore JL. 2005. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3:e314.
10. Flagel LE, Wendel JF. 2010. Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation. New Phytol. 186:184-193.
11. Freeling M, et al. 2008. Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales. Genome Res. 18: 1924-1937.
12. Freeling M, Rapaka L, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Thomas BC. 2007. G-boxes, bigfoot genes, and environmental response: characterization of intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:1441-1457.
13. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16:805-814.
14. Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. 2007. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell Online 19:3403-3417.
15. Goff SA, et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296:92-100.
16. Grass Phylogeny Working Group. 2001. Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard. 88: 373-457.
17. Harris RS. 2007. Improved pairwise alignment of genomic data. [cited 2012 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.bx.psu.edu/;rsharris/rsharris-phd-thesis- 2007.pdf.
18. The International Brachypodium Initiative. 2010. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463:763-768.
19. Lai J, et al. 2010. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet. 42:1027-1030.
20. Langham RJ, et al. 2004. Genomic duplication, fractionation and the origin of regulatory novelty. Genetics 166:935-945.
21. Larkin DM, et al. 2009. Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories. Genome Res. 19:770-777.
22. Lynch M, Force AG. 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am Nat. 156:590-605.
23. Lyons E, Pedersen B, Kane J, Freeling M. 2008. The Value of nonmodel genomes and an example using SynMap within CoGe to dissect the hexaploidy that predates the rosids. Trop Plant Biol. 1:181-190.
24. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279-283.
25. Massa AN, et al. 2011. Gene space dynamics during the evolution of Aegilops tauschii, Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa, and Sorghum bicolor genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 28(9):2537-2547.
26. Mizuta Y, Harushima Y, Kurata N. 2010. Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:20417-20422.
27. Osborn TC, et al. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 19:141-147.
28. Ouyang S, et al. 2007. The TIGR rice genome annotation resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D883-D887.
29. Paterson AH, et al. 2009. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551-556.
30. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA. 2004. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 9903-9908.
31. Prasad V, Strömberg CAE, Alimohammadian H, Sahni A. 2005. Dinosaur coprolites and the early evolution of grasses and grazers. Science 310:1177-1180.
32. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 29:467-501.
33. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317:910-914.
34. Salse J, et al. 2009. Reconstruction of monocotelydoneous protochromosomes reveals faster evolution in plants than in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:14908-14913.
35. Sankoff D, Zheng C, Zhu Q. 2010. The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 11:313.
36. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440:341-345.
37. Schnable JC, Freeling M. 2011. Genes identified by visible mutant phenotypes show increased bias toward one of two subgenomes of maize. PLoS One. 6:e17855.
38. Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Subramaniam S, Freeling M. 2011. Dosesensitivity, conserved noncoding sequences and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses. Front Plant Sci. 2:2.
39. Schnable JC, Springer NM, Freeling M. 2011. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:4069-4074.
40. Schnable PS, et al. 2009. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112-1115.
41. Sémon M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Reciprocal gene loss between Tetraodon and zebrafish after whole genome duplication in their ancestor. Trends Genet. 23:108-112.
42. Seoighe C, Gehring C. 2004. Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome. Trends Genet. 20:461-464.
43. Soderlund C, Bomhoff M, Nelson WM. 2011. SyMAP v3.4: a turnkey synteny system with application to plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:e68.
44. Soltis DE, et al. 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot. 96:336-348.
45. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:561-588.
46. Springer NM, et al. 2009. Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000734.
47. Swanson-Wagner RA, et al. 2010. Pervasive gene content variation and copy number variation in maize and its undomesticated progenitor. Genome Res. 20:1689-1699.
48. SwigoňováZ, et al. 2004. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Res. 14:1916-1923.
49. Tang H, Bowers JE, Wang X, Paterson AH. 2010. Angiosperm genome comparisons reveal early polyploidy in the monocot lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:472-477.
50. Tang H, et al. 2011. Screening synteny blocks in pairwise genome comparisons through integer programming. BMC Bioinformatics 12:102.
51. Thomas BC, Pedersen B, Freeling M. 2006. Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes. Genome Res. 16:934-946.
52. Tuskan GA, et al. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596-1604.
53. van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10:725-732.
54. Wang X, Tang H, Paterson AH. 2011. Seventy million years of concerted evolution of a homoeologous chromosome pair, in parallel, in major Poaceae lineages. Plant Cell 23(1):27-37.
55. Woodhouse MR, et al. 2010. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000409.
56. Xiong Z, Gaeta RT, Pires JC. 2011. Homoeologous shuffing and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(19):7908-7913.
57. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
58. Yu J, et al. 2005. The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol. 3:e38.